An Economic Case for Transparency in Private Equity: Data Science, Interest Alignment and Organic Finance

Mutual Funds Pub Date : 2021-09-27 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3931906
Ashby H. B. Monk, Sheridan Porter, Rajiv Sharma
{"title":"An Economic Case for Transparency in Private Equity: Data Science, Interest Alignment and Organic Finance","authors":"Ashby H. B. Monk, Sheridan Porter, Rajiv Sharma","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3931906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The private equity asset class has grown rapidly since 2008, attracting institutional investors in need of higher returns than those expected from public markets. But while most investors would say they have been rewarded with good performance, this success is hard to objectively demonstrate due to intransitive metrics and unmeasured risks. It is our belief that there is a pressing need to substantiate the economic case for private equity. In this article, we describe a new transparency framework, which we situate in our research agenda on ‘organic finance’. The framework uses data science technology to operationalize private equity data and institute a scientific approach to performance measurement. We elucidate what scientific measurement should look like in private equity, incorporating examples of technologies in use today. We also reveal how bringing new levels of transparency into the asset class can, on its own, create significant value. Finally, we look at the effect of organic finance on the industry, connecting greater transparency to a structural shift that enables efficiencies, expansion, and innovation. The magnitude and sustainability of this shift reinforces the economic case for private equity, albeit with far more transparency than is practiced today.","PeriodicalId":18891,"journal":{"name":"Mutual Funds","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutual Funds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3931906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The private equity asset class has grown rapidly since 2008, attracting institutional investors in need of higher returns than those expected from public markets. But while most investors would say they have been rewarded with good performance, this success is hard to objectively demonstrate due to intransitive metrics and unmeasured risks. It is our belief that there is a pressing need to substantiate the economic case for private equity. In this article, we describe a new transparency framework, which we situate in our research agenda on ‘organic finance’. The framework uses data science technology to operationalize private equity data and institute a scientific approach to performance measurement. We elucidate what scientific measurement should look like in private equity, incorporating examples of technologies in use today. We also reveal how bringing new levels of transparency into the asset class can, on its own, create significant value. Finally, we look at the effect of organic finance on the industry, connecting greater transparency to a structural shift that enables efficiencies, expansion, and innovation. The magnitude and sustainability of this shift reinforces the economic case for private equity, albeit with far more transparency than is practiced today.
私募股权透明度的经济案例:数据科学、利益一致性和有机金融
自2008年以来,私人股本资产类别迅速增长,吸引了那些希望获得高于公开市场预期回报的机构投资者。但是,尽管大多数投资者会说他们获得了良好的业绩回报,但由于缺乏传递性的指标和无法衡量的风险,这种成功很难客观地证明。我们认为,迫切需要证实私人股本的经济理由。在本文中,我们描述了一个新的透明度框架,我们将其置于我们关于“有机金融”的研究议程中。该框架使用数据科学技术对私募股权数据进行操作,并建立了一种科学的绩效衡量方法。我们将结合目前使用的技术实例,阐明私募股权中的科学测量应该是什么样子。我们还揭示了将新的透明度引入资产类别本身如何创造重大价值。最后,我们着眼于有机金融对行业的影响,将更大的透明度与实现效率、扩张和创新的结构转变联系起来。这种转变的规模和可持续性强化了私人股本投资的经济理由,尽管其透明度远高于目前的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信