Scene-Adaptive Fusion of Visual and Motion Tracking for Vision-Guided Micromanipulation in Plant Cells

Ishara Paranawithana, U-Xuan Tan, Liangjing Yang, Zhong Chen, K. Youcef-Toumi
{"title":"Scene-Adaptive Fusion of Visual and Motion Tracking for Vision-Guided Micromanipulation in Plant Cells","authors":"Ishara Paranawithana, U-Xuan Tan, Liangjing Yang, Zhong Chen, K. Youcef-Toumi","doi":"10.1109/COASE.2018.8560699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work proposes a fusion mechanism that overcomes the traditional limitations in vision-guided micromanipulation in plant cells. Despite the recent advancement in vision-guided micromanipulation, only a handful of research addressed the intrinsic issues related to micromanipulation in plant cells. Unlike single cell manipulation, the structural complexity of plant cells makes visual tracking extremely challenging. There is therefore a need to complement the visual tracking approach with trajectory data from the manipulator. Fusion of the two sources of data is done by combining the projected trajectory data to the image domain and template tracking data using a score-based weighted averaging approach. Similarity score reflecting the confidence of a particular localization result is used as the basis of the weighted average. As the projected trajectory data of the manipulator is not at all affected by the visual disturbances such as regional occlusion, fusing estimations from two sources leads to improved tracking performance. Experimental results suggest that fusion-based tracking mechanism maintains a mean error of 2.15 pixels whereas template tracking and projected trajectory data has a mean error of 2.49 and 2.61 pixels, respectively. Path B of the square trajectory demonstrated a significant improvement with a mean error of 1.11 pixels with 50% of the tracking ROI occluded by plant specimen. Under these conditions, both template tracking and projected trajectory data show similar performances with a mean error of 2.59 and 2.58 pixels, respectively. By addressing the limitations and unmet needs in the application of plant cell bio-manipulation, we hope to bridge the gap in the development of automatic vision-guided micromanipulation in plant cells.","PeriodicalId":6518,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE)","volume":"51 1","pages":"1434-1440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COASE.2018.8560699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This work proposes a fusion mechanism that overcomes the traditional limitations in vision-guided micromanipulation in plant cells. Despite the recent advancement in vision-guided micromanipulation, only a handful of research addressed the intrinsic issues related to micromanipulation in plant cells. Unlike single cell manipulation, the structural complexity of plant cells makes visual tracking extremely challenging. There is therefore a need to complement the visual tracking approach with trajectory data from the manipulator. Fusion of the two sources of data is done by combining the projected trajectory data to the image domain and template tracking data using a score-based weighted averaging approach. Similarity score reflecting the confidence of a particular localization result is used as the basis of the weighted average. As the projected trajectory data of the manipulator is not at all affected by the visual disturbances such as regional occlusion, fusing estimations from two sources leads to improved tracking performance. Experimental results suggest that fusion-based tracking mechanism maintains a mean error of 2.15 pixels whereas template tracking and projected trajectory data has a mean error of 2.49 and 2.61 pixels, respectively. Path B of the square trajectory demonstrated a significant improvement with a mean error of 1.11 pixels with 50% of the tracking ROI occluded by plant specimen. Under these conditions, both template tracking and projected trajectory data show similar performances with a mean error of 2.59 and 2.58 pixels, respectively. By addressing the limitations and unmet needs in the application of plant cell bio-manipulation, we hope to bridge the gap in the development of automatic vision-guided micromanipulation in plant cells.
植物细胞视觉引导微操作中视觉与运动跟踪的场景自适应融合
这项工作提出了一种融合机制,克服了视觉引导植物细胞微操作的传统局限性。尽管最近在视觉引导的微操作方面取得了进展,但只有少数研究解决了与植物细胞微操作相关的内在问题。与单细胞操作不同,植物细胞结构的复杂性使得视觉跟踪极具挑战性。因此,需要用机械手的轨迹数据来补充视觉跟踪方法。两个数据源的融合是通过使用基于分数的加权平均方法将投影轨迹数据与图像域和模板跟踪数据相结合来完成的。用反映特定定位结果置信度的相似度得分作为加权平均的基础。由于机械臂的投影轨迹数据完全不受区域遮挡等视觉干扰的影响,因此融合两源估计可以提高跟踪性能。实验结果表明,基于融合的跟踪机制的平均误差为2.15像素,而模板跟踪和投影轨迹数据的平均误差分别为2.49和2.61像素。正方形轨迹路径B的平均误差为1.11像素,其中50%的跟踪ROI被植物标本遮挡。在此条件下,模板跟踪和投影轨迹数据均表现出相似的性能,平均误差分别为2.59和2.58像素。通过解决植物细胞生物操作应用中的局限性和未满足的需求,我们希望弥合植物细胞自动视觉引导微操作的发展差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信