The Missing Pieces of Derrida’s Voice and Phenomenon

Q3 Arts and Humanities
G. Harman
{"title":"The Missing Pieces of Derrida’s Voice and Phenomenon","authors":"G. Harman","doi":"10.14394/eidos.jpc.2022.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Jacques Derrida’s critique of Edmund Husserl in Voice and Phenomenon targets several ways in which Husserl’s theory of signs is said to remain dependent on a model of presence, and therefore to be a form of onto-theology. In a sense this simply extends Martin Heidegger’s own critique of Husserl as failing to account for what remains obscure behind any presentation to the mind. Yet Derrida’s critique is ultimately more radical than Heidegger’s, though the radicality is in this case unjustified. Namely, Derrida goes beyond Heidegger’s critique of presence to mount an additional critique of “self-presence,” which is more often known as “identity.” Derrida’s insufficiently motivated critique of identity leads to additional problems for his philosophy.","PeriodicalId":52397,"journal":{"name":"Eidos: A Journal for Philosophy of Culture","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eidos: A Journal for Philosophy of Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2022.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Jacques Derrida’s critique of Edmund Husserl in Voice and Phenomenon targets several ways in which Husserl’s theory of signs is said to remain dependent on a model of presence, and therefore to be a form of onto-theology. In a sense this simply extends Martin Heidegger’s own critique of Husserl as failing to account for what remains obscure behind any presentation to the mind. Yet Derrida’s critique is ultimately more radical than Heidegger’s, though the radicality is in this case unjustified. Namely, Derrida goes beyond Heidegger’s critique of presence to mount an additional critique of “self-presence,” which is more often known as “identity.” Derrida’s insufficiently motivated critique of identity leads to additional problems for his philosophy.
德里达的声音和现象缺失的片段
雅克·德里达在《声音与现象》一书中对埃德蒙·胡塞尔的批评针对的是胡塞尔的符号理论依赖于存在模式的几个方面,因此是本体神学的一种形式。从某种意义上说,这只是扩展了马丁·海德格尔对胡塞尔的批评,因为胡塞尔未能解释任何对心灵的呈现背后仍然模糊的东西。然而德里达的批判最终比海德格尔的更激进,尽管这种激进在这种情况下是不合理的。也就是说,德里达超越了海德格尔对在场的批判,对“自我在场”进行了额外的批判,这通常被称为“身份”。德里达对同一性的缺乏动机的批判给他的哲学带来了额外的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eidos: A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
Eidos: A Journal for Philosophy of Culture Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信