Strict Virtual Call Integrity Checking for C++ Binaries

Mohamed Elsabagh, D. Fleck, A. Stavrou
{"title":"Strict Virtual Call Integrity Checking for C++ Binaries","authors":"Mohamed Elsabagh, D. Fleck, A. Stavrou","doi":"10.1145/3052973.3052976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern operating systems are equipped with defenses that render legacy code injection attacks inoperable. However, attackers can bypass these defenses by crafting attacks that reuse existing code in a program's memory. One of the most common classes of attacks manipulates memory data used indirectly to execute code, such as function pointers. This is especially prevalent in C++ programs, since tables of function pointers (vtables) are used by all major compilers to support polymorphism. In this paper, we propose VCI, a binary rewriting system that secures C++ binaries against vtable attacks. VCI works directly on stripped binary files. It identifies and reconstructs various C++ semantics from the binary, and constructs a strict CFI policy by resolving and pairing virtual function calls (vcalls) with precise sets of target classes. The policy is enforced by instrumenting checks into the binary at vcall sites. Experimental results on SPEC CPU2006 and Firefox show that VCI is significantly more precise than state-of-the-art binary solutions. Testing against the ground truth from the source-based defense GCC VTV, VCI achieved greater than 60% precision in most cases, accounting for at least 48% to 99% additional reduction in the attack surface compared to the state-of-the-art binary defenses. VCI incurs a 7.79% average runtime overhead which is comparable to the state-of-the-art. In addition, we discuss how VCI defends against real-world attacks, and how it impacts advanced vtable reuse attacks such as COOP.","PeriodicalId":20540,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3052973.3052976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Modern operating systems are equipped with defenses that render legacy code injection attacks inoperable. However, attackers can bypass these defenses by crafting attacks that reuse existing code in a program's memory. One of the most common classes of attacks manipulates memory data used indirectly to execute code, such as function pointers. This is especially prevalent in C++ programs, since tables of function pointers (vtables) are used by all major compilers to support polymorphism. In this paper, we propose VCI, a binary rewriting system that secures C++ binaries against vtable attacks. VCI works directly on stripped binary files. It identifies and reconstructs various C++ semantics from the binary, and constructs a strict CFI policy by resolving and pairing virtual function calls (vcalls) with precise sets of target classes. The policy is enforced by instrumenting checks into the binary at vcall sites. Experimental results on SPEC CPU2006 and Firefox show that VCI is significantly more precise than state-of-the-art binary solutions. Testing against the ground truth from the source-based defense GCC VTV, VCI achieved greater than 60% precision in most cases, accounting for at least 48% to 99% additional reduction in the attack surface compared to the state-of-the-art binary defenses. VCI incurs a 7.79% average runtime overhead which is comparable to the state-of-the-art. In addition, we discuss how VCI defends against real-world attacks, and how it impacts advanced vtable reuse attacks such as COOP.
严格的虚调用完整性检查c++二进制文件
现代操作系统配备了防御措施,使遗留代码注入攻击无法操作。然而,攻击者可以通过重新使用程序内存中的现有代码来制造攻击,从而绕过这些防御。最常见的攻击类型之一是操纵间接用于执行代码的内存数据,例如函数指针。这在c++程序中尤其普遍,因为所有主要的编译器都使用函数指针表(虚表)来支持多态性。在本文中,我们提出了VCI,一个二进制重写系统,保护c++二进制文件免受虚表攻击。VCI直接作用于剥离的二进制文件。它从二进制文件中识别和重建各种c++语义,并通过解析和配对虚拟函数调用(vcalls)与精确的目标类集来构建严格的CFI策略。该策略是通过在vcall站点的二进制文件中插入检查来实施的。在SPEC CPU2006和Firefox上的实验结果表明,VCI比最先进的二进制解决方案要精确得多。根据基于源的防御GCC VTV的地面事实进行测试,VCI在大多数情况下实现了超过60%的精度,与最先进的二进制防御相比,至少减少了48%至99%的攻击面。VCI的平均运行时开销为7.79%,这与最先进的技术相当。此外,我们还讨论了VCI如何防御真实世界的攻击,以及它如何影响高级虚表重用攻击(如COOP)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信