Nothing about Us without Us: Teaching about (Dis)ability in the Early Grades

J. Bickford, Dalani A. Little
{"title":"Nothing about Us without Us: Teaching about (Dis)ability in the Early Grades","authors":"J. Bickford, Dalani A. Little","doi":"10.1080/00377996.2021.1945994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Students, especially young children, recognize differences. This guided inquiry positions elementary students to consider the (dis)abilities they see and do not see. This article couples trade books emphasizing diverse perspectives—general, American, people of color, international contexts, fiction, and disparate (dis)abilities—with evocative primary sources—telegrams, letters, photographs, bumper stickers, and buttons—highlighting advocacy for equity. The secondary and primary sources offer an array of curricular possibilities featuring famous, forgotten, and ordinary historical and modern voices. Text-based primary sources were abridged for length and adapted for language. Five graphic organizers evoke distinct types of thinking—historical thinking, close reading of text and subtext for critical thinking, unpacking text-based primary sources, examining visual primary sources, or illustrating central ideas—while providing varied levels of support. The age-appropriate texts engage students in elements of history, civics, and social and emotional learning. The tasks direct students’ thinking by integrating reading and writing in an interdisciplinary format flexible for elementary schedules. The inquiry culminates as students use distinct writing forms (expository, persuasive, or narrative) to engage various audiences (authors, librarians, administrators, teachers, counselors, or family) in informed dialogue about (dis)ability in history and today.","PeriodicalId":83074,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of social education : official journal of the Indiana Council for the Social Studies","volume":"75 1","pages":"1 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of social education : official journal of the Indiana Council for the Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2021.1945994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Students, especially young children, recognize differences. This guided inquiry positions elementary students to consider the (dis)abilities they see and do not see. This article couples trade books emphasizing diverse perspectives—general, American, people of color, international contexts, fiction, and disparate (dis)abilities—with evocative primary sources—telegrams, letters, photographs, bumper stickers, and buttons—highlighting advocacy for equity. The secondary and primary sources offer an array of curricular possibilities featuring famous, forgotten, and ordinary historical and modern voices. Text-based primary sources were abridged for length and adapted for language. Five graphic organizers evoke distinct types of thinking—historical thinking, close reading of text and subtext for critical thinking, unpacking text-based primary sources, examining visual primary sources, or illustrating central ideas—while providing varied levels of support. The age-appropriate texts engage students in elements of history, civics, and social and emotional learning. The tasks direct students’ thinking by integrating reading and writing in an interdisciplinary format flexible for elementary schedules. The inquiry culminates as students use distinct writing forms (expository, persuasive, or narrative) to engage various audiences (authors, librarians, administrators, teachers, counselors, or family) in informed dialogue about (dis)ability in history and today.
《没有我们,就没有我们:关于低年级(残疾)能力的教学
学生,尤其是幼儿,能够识别差异。这种指导性的探究使小学生思考他们看到的和没有看到的(残疾)能力。这篇文章结合了强调不同观点的商业书籍——普通的、美国的、有色人种的、国际背景的、小说的和不同的(残疾)能力的——与唤起人们共鸣的主要来源——电报、信件、照片、保险杠贴纸和按钮——强调平等的倡导。二手和一手资源提供了一系列的课程可能性,包括著名的,被遗忘的,和普通的历史和现代的声音。基于文本的原始资料因长度而被删节,并根据语言进行了改编。五个图形组织者唤起不同类型的思维-历史思维,文本细读和潜台词的批判性思维,拆解基于文本的主要来源,检查视觉主要来源,或说明中心思想-同时提供不同程度的支持。与学生年龄相适应的教材让学生参与历史、公民、社会和情感学习的要素。这些任务通过将阅读和写作结合起来,以一种跨学科的形式指导学生的思维。当学生使用不同的写作形式(说明性、说服性或叙事性)与不同的受众(作者、图书管理员、管理人员、教师、辅导员或家庭)就历史和今天的(残疾)能力进行明智的对话时,探究达到了高潮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信