A visão do ortopedista brasileiro sobre a descarga parcial de peso em ortostase nas fraturas expostas da diáfise da tíbia após osteossíntese

Valéria R. G. Sella, P. Machado, Hélio Jorge Alvachian Fernandes, William R. Limonge, F. B. D. Reis, F. Faloppa
{"title":"A visão do ortopedista brasileiro sobre a descarga parcial de peso em ortostase nas fraturas expostas da diáfise da tíbia após osteossíntese","authors":"Valéria R. G. Sella, P. Machado, Hélio Jorge Alvachian Fernandes, William R. Limonge, F. B. D. Reis, F. Faloppa","doi":"10.1590/S1413-35552009000600008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Tibial shaft fractures are the most frequent among long bone fractures. They are described in the literature according to the device and method of treatment, with recommendations that range from full weight bearing to non-weight bearing restrictions. There are studies comparing osteosynthesis devices and surgical aspects, but no references were found on how or when to allow weight bearing on the affected limb in the standing position. OBJECTIVES: The present study learned from Brazilian orthopedists which methods of osteosynthesis they use to treat open tibial fractures, whether they refer patients to physical therapy, when and why they allow partial weight bearing for both physical activity and therapy. METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-five orthopedists answered a questionnaire during the 14th Brazilian Conference of Orthopedic Trauma. Results: The results showed that, in Brazil, the most widely used osteosynthesis device is the external fixator, but earlier weight bearing while standing occurs when intramedullary nails are used. Most orthopedists refer patients to physical therapy and allow partial weight bearing in the standing position according to the material used for synthesis. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that there is a preference for external fixation, that most orthopedists refer patients to physical therapy and that the synthesis material influences restrictions on partial weight bearing.","PeriodicalId":21195,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","volume":"12 1","pages":"514-520"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552009000600008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tibial shaft fractures are the most frequent among long bone fractures. They are described in the literature according to the device and method of treatment, with recommendations that range from full weight bearing to non-weight bearing restrictions. There are studies comparing osteosynthesis devices and surgical aspects, but no references were found on how or when to allow weight bearing on the affected limb in the standing position. OBJECTIVES: The present study learned from Brazilian orthopedists which methods of osteosynthesis they use to treat open tibial fractures, whether they refer patients to physical therapy, when and why they allow partial weight bearing for both physical activity and therapy. METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-five orthopedists answered a questionnaire during the 14th Brazilian Conference of Orthopedic Trauma. Results: The results showed that, in Brazil, the most widely used osteosynthesis device is the external fixator, but earlier weight bearing while standing occurs when intramedullary nails are used. Most orthopedists refer patients to physical therapy and allow partial weight bearing in the standing position according to the material used for synthesis. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that there is a preference for external fixation, that most orthopedists refer patients to physical therapy and that the synthesis material influences restrictions on partial weight bearing.
巴西骨科医生对骨合后胫骨骨干暴露骨折站立时部分负重的看法
背景:胫骨干骨折是长骨骨折中最常见的。它们在文献中根据治疗设备和方法进行了描述,推荐范围从完全负重到非负重限制。有研究比较了骨固定装置和手术方面,但没有发现关于如何或何时在站立位置允许受影响肢体负重的参考文献。目的:本研究从巴西骨科医生那里了解到,他们使用哪种方法来治疗开放性胫骨骨折,他们是否建议患者进行物理治疗,何时以及为什么允许部分负重进行身体活动和治疗。方法:在第14届巴西骨科创伤会议期间,235名骨科医生回答了一份问卷。结果:结果显示,在巴西,最广泛使用的骨固定装置是外固定架,但较早的站立负重发生在使用髓内钉时。大多数骨科医生建议患者进行物理治疗,并根据合成所用的材料允许站立位置部分负重。结论:患者倾向于外固定,大多数骨科医生建议患者进行物理治疗,并且合成材料对部分负重的限制有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信