Acute Effects of Marathon Running on Lung Function, Lung Mechanics, and Inflammation

Q4 Health Professions
Thiago G. Gibson Alves, Ana P. R. Sierra, R. Moraes Ferreira, M. Brandao-Rangel, A. Silva-Reis, T. A. de Lima, L. V. D. de Oliveira, Maria F. C. Boaventura, R. Albertini, A. Bachi, R. Vieira
{"title":"Acute Effects of Marathon Running on Lung Function, Lung Mechanics, and Inflammation","authors":"Thiago G. Gibson Alves, Ana P. R. Sierra, R. Moraes Ferreira, M. Brandao-Rangel, A. Silva-Reis, T. A. de Lima, L. V. D. de Oliveira, Maria F. C. Boaventura, R. Albertini, A. Bachi, R. Vieira","doi":"10.24018/ejsport.2022.1.6.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the influence of the marathon on lung function, mechanics, and pulmonary inflammation. Twenty-eight male amateur marathon runners (42.1±6.2 years) were evaluated before and immediately after marathon. Pulmonary function and mechanics were assessed using spirometry and impulse oscillometry, respectively, whereas fatigue of the respiratory muscles by manovacuometry and lung inflammation by fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). Marathon induced a significant reduction in the lung function as compared to baseline values: FVC (4.81±0.72 vs 4.67±0.62, p=0.0095), VC IN (4.81±0.72 vs 4.67±0.62, p=0.009), FEV1 (3.83±0.62 vs 3.72±0.59, p=0.0232), and FEV6 (4.87±0.68 vs 4.57±0.63, p=0.0006), as well as an impairment in the lung mechanics in comparison to baseline values: reduced pulmonary impedance (Z5Hz; 2.96±1.36 vs 2.67±1.11; p=0.0305), reduced resistance of the whole respiratory system (R5Hz; 2.76±1.27 vs 2.5±1.08; p=0.0388) and pulmonary reactance (X5Hz; -1.05±0.55 vs -0.91±0.36; p=0.0101) and of resistance of proximal airways (R5Hz; 1.26±0.73 vs 1.06±0.86; p= 0.0377). In addition, maximal inspiratory (MIP; 94.14±41.88 vs 72.52±25.50; p=0.0023) and expiratory (MEP; 99.31±31.84 vs 91.29±19.94; p=0.0454) pressures, as well as FeNO levels were lower after the marathon than values pre-marathon (p=0.0359). Marathon running causes an acute disturbance in lung function and mechanics and compromises respiratory muscle strength.","PeriodicalId":36509,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejsport.2022.1.6.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of the marathon on lung function, mechanics, and pulmonary inflammation. Twenty-eight male amateur marathon runners (42.1±6.2 years) were evaluated before and immediately after marathon. Pulmonary function and mechanics were assessed using spirometry and impulse oscillometry, respectively, whereas fatigue of the respiratory muscles by manovacuometry and lung inflammation by fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). Marathon induced a significant reduction in the lung function as compared to baseline values: FVC (4.81±0.72 vs 4.67±0.62, p=0.0095), VC IN (4.81±0.72 vs 4.67±0.62, p=0.009), FEV1 (3.83±0.62 vs 3.72±0.59, p=0.0232), and FEV6 (4.87±0.68 vs 4.57±0.63, p=0.0006), as well as an impairment in the lung mechanics in comparison to baseline values: reduced pulmonary impedance (Z5Hz; 2.96±1.36 vs 2.67±1.11; p=0.0305), reduced resistance of the whole respiratory system (R5Hz; 2.76±1.27 vs 2.5±1.08; p=0.0388) and pulmonary reactance (X5Hz; -1.05±0.55 vs -0.91±0.36; p=0.0101) and of resistance of proximal airways (R5Hz; 1.26±0.73 vs 1.06±0.86; p= 0.0377). In addition, maximal inspiratory (MIP; 94.14±41.88 vs 72.52±25.50; p=0.0023) and expiratory (MEP; 99.31±31.84 vs 91.29±19.94; p=0.0454) pressures, as well as FeNO levels were lower after the marathon than values pre-marathon (p=0.0359). Marathon running causes an acute disturbance in lung function and mechanics and compromises respiratory muscle strength.
马拉松对肺功能、肺力学和炎症的急性影响
本研究探讨了马拉松对肺功能、力学和肺部炎症的影响。对28名男性业余马拉松运动员(42.1±6.2岁)进行赛前和赛后评价。分别使用肺活量测定法和脉冲振荡法评估肺功能和力学,而通过压力测量法评估呼吸肌疲劳,通过分数呼气一氧化氮(FeNO)评估肺部炎症。与基线值相比,马拉松导致肺功能显著降低:FVC(4.81±0.72 vs 4.67±0.62,p=0.0095), VC in(4.81±0.72 vs 4.67±0.62,p=0.009), FEV1(3.83±0.62 vs 3.72±0.59,p=0.0232), FEV6(4.87±0.68 vs 4.57±0.63,p=0.0006),以及肺力学损伤与基线值相比:肺阻抗降低(Z5Hz;2.96±1.36 vs 2.67±1.11;p=0.0305),全呼吸系统阻力降低(R5Hz;2.76±1.27 vs 2.5±1.08;p=0.0388)和肺电抗(X5Hz;-1.05±0.55 vs -0.91±0.36;p=0.0101)和近端气道阻力(R5Hz;1.26±0.73 vs 1.06±0.86;p = 0.0377)。此外,最大吸气量(MIP;94.14±41.88 vs 72.52±25.50;p=0.0023)和呼气(MEP;99.31±31.84 vs 91.29±19.94;p=0.0454)血压,马拉松后FeNO水平低于马拉松前(p=0.0359)。马拉松跑步会导致肺功能和力学的急性紊乱,并损害呼吸肌的力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine Business, Management and Accounting-Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信