{"title":"Movements in the Hollow Coffin: On “The Fall of the House of Usher”","authors":"M. Steven","doi":"10.1111/J.1754-6095.2011.00033.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An irrational belief that the dead may return to haunt the living is part of “the uncanny,” a psychical phenomenon whose theory Sigmund Freud adapts (from Ernst Jentsch) to describe “the perceptible reanimation of something familiar that has been repressed.” “The writer,” Freud argues, brings us “in relation to spirits, demons, and ghosts” by “not letting us know whether he is taking us into the real world or into a purely fantastic one of his own creation.”1 If psychoanalytic theory holds that literature is manifestly a haunted medium, then perhaps a productive intersection could be staged between Freud’s uncanny and Jacques Derrida’s “hauntology”— between psychical phenomena and a critical program that “supplants its nearhomonym ontology, replacing the priority of being and presence with the figure of the ghost as that which is neither present nor absent, neither dead nor alive.”2 The literary figure of this conjunction would best be described as “undead”—and, by reading an exemplarily haunted work of literature with these two theories in mind, I want to propose some ideas for what I am going to call “the undeath of the author.” To begin with a concession: Edgar Allan Poe is done to death. While the flesh-and-blood Poe met his physical end over 160 years ago—done in by either alcohol, brain congestion, cholera, drugs, heart disease, rabies, suicide, or tuberculosis—similarly myriad scholars have dissected his literary corpus with all the critical tools provided them, and by doing so they have turned out a variety of different Poes. Scott Peeples describes a handful in the preface to his indispensible Afterlife of Edgar Allan Poe (2004): “the romantic Southern outcast, the patron saint of the French symbolists, the hack, the test case for Freudian psychoanlysis, the proto-deconstructionist, the racist, the antiracist, and so on.”3 Achieving metaphorical quintessence, then, a profusion of that scholarship has been deeply indebted to Roland Barthes’s seminal essay “Death of the Author” (1967). Within this context, the most famous work to be influenced by Barthes—Joseph Riddel’s 1979 essay “The ‘Crypt’ of Edgar Poe”—argues that, in Poe’s tales, “images of nature are already metonymic substitutions for words—or substitutions for substitutions,” and that Poe’s “realm of dreams” is in fact the “realm of language.”4 It is thus that Poe has","PeriodicalId":40386,"journal":{"name":"Poe Studies-History Theory Interpretation","volume":"5 1","pages":"15 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poe Studies-History Theory Interpretation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1754-6095.2011.00033.X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
An irrational belief that the dead may return to haunt the living is part of “the uncanny,” a psychical phenomenon whose theory Sigmund Freud adapts (from Ernst Jentsch) to describe “the perceptible reanimation of something familiar that has been repressed.” “The writer,” Freud argues, brings us “in relation to spirits, demons, and ghosts” by “not letting us know whether he is taking us into the real world or into a purely fantastic one of his own creation.”1 If psychoanalytic theory holds that literature is manifestly a haunted medium, then perhaps a productive intersection could be staged between Freud’s uncanny and Jacques Derrida’s “hauntology”— between psychical phenomena and a critical program that “supplants its nearhomonym ontology, replacing the priority of being and presence with the figure of the ghost as that which is neither present nor absent, neither dead nor alive.”2 The literary figure of this conjunction would best be described as “undead”—and, by reading an exemplarily haunted work of literature with these two theories in mind, I want to propose some ideas for what I am going to call “the undeath of the author.” To begin with a concession: Edgar Allan Poe is done to death. While the flesh-and-blood Poe met his physical end over 160 years ago—done in by either alcohol, brain congestion, cholera, drugs, heart disease, rabies, suicide, or tuberculosis—similarly myriad scholars have dissected his literary corpus with all the critical tools provided them, and by doing so they have turned out a variety of different Poes. Scott Peeples describes a handful in the preface to his indispensible Afterlife of Edgar Allan Poe (2004): “the romantic Southern outcast, the patron saint of the French symbolists, the hack, the test case for Freudian psychoanlysis, the proto-deconstructionist, the racist, the antiracist, and so on.”3 Achieving metaphorical quintessence, then, a profusion of that scholarship has been deeply indebted to Roland Barthes’s seminal essay “Death of the Author” (1967). Within this context, the most famous work to be influenced by Barthes—Joseph Riddel’s 1979 essay “The ‘Crypt’ of Edgar Poe”—argues that, in Poe’s tales, “images of nature are already metonymic substitutions for words—or substitutions for substitutions,” and that Poe’s “realm of dreams” is in fact the “realm of language.”4 It is thus that Poe has
一种非理性的信念,认为死者可能会回到活着的人身边,这是“不可思议”的一部分,这是一种心理现象,西格蒙德·弗洛伊德的理论(来自恩斯特·扬施)用来描述“被压抑的熟悉事物的可感知的复活”。弗洛伊德认为,“作家”通过“不让我们知道他是把我们带入现实世界,还是带入他自己创造的纯粹幻想的世界”,把我们“与精神、恶魔和鬼魂联系起来”。如果精神分析理论认为文学显然是一种闹鬼的媒介,那么也许可以在弗洛伊德的神秘和雅克·德里达的“闹鬼学”之间上演一场富有成效的交集——在心理现象和一种“取代其近乎同义的本体论”的批判程序之间,用鬼魂的形象取代存在和在场的优先权,因为鬼魂既不在场也不缺席,既不死也不活。这种结合的文学形象最好被描述为“不死”——通过阅读一部典型的闹鬼文学作品,并牢记这两种理论,我想提出一些关于我所谓的“作者不死”的想法。我们先做个让步:埃德加·爱伦·坡被搞死了。160多年前,有血有肉的爱伦·坡因酒精、脑充血、霍乱、毒品、心脏病、狂犬病、自杀或肺结核等原因而与世长辞。同样,无数的学者用他们所提供的所有重要工具解剖了他的文学作品,并由此得出了各种不同的爱伦·坡。斯科特·皮尔普斯在他必不可少的《埃德加·爱伦·坡的来世》(2004)的序言中描述了一些:“浪漫的南方流浪者,法国象征主义者的守护神,黑鬼,弗洛伊德精神分析的测试案例,原始解构主义者,种族主义者,反种族主义者,等等。”获得隐喻的精髓,那么,大量的学术研究要深深感谢罗兰·巴特的开创性论文“作者之死”(1967)。在这种背景下,约瑟夫·里德尔(joseph Riddel)在1979年发表的论文《埃德加·坡的“墓穴”》(the‘the Crypt of Edgar Poe)是受巴思影响最著名的作品。他认为,在坡的故事中,“自然的意象已经是词语的转喻替代物——或者替代物的替代物”,而坡的“梦的领域”实际上就是“语言的领域”。坡就是这样做的