Leaning “well beyond the plumb” of His Native Language: Heaney’s Tone and the International Style

4区 文学
Nick Norwood
{"title":"Leaning “well beyond the plumb” of His Native Language: Heaney’s Tone and the International Style","authors":"Nick Norwood","doi":"10.24162/EI2015-6567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last decades of his life Seamus Heaney occupied the position of \"world poet\" and outsold--or so it was widely held--all other poets writing in English. Such popularity, accessibility--such transferability--would suggest, among other things, that his work manifests at least some semblance of an \"international style\". Admittedly, it is a pretty slippery term. But it is worth asking, by what other means than manifesting a \"style\" with an \"international\" appeal could Heaney have attracted such a large international audience? What would make readers as far-flung as West Texas and Eastern Siberia find his work so compelling? Roy Foster, professor of poetry at Oxford and a Heaney scholar, calls him flatly \"an international poet\" (2013), and as much as one may want to associate Heaney with a small farm in Co. Derry, Northern Ireland, it is hard to argue that Foster is not in some sense correct. But Foster also acknowledges that as much as anything else Heaney's tone--\"the worlds below\" (2013), as he glosses his use of the term--may be the most important characteristic of his work. One might reasonably argue that many aspects of Heaney's poetry are worthy of consideration and contribute to its overall success: its linguistic richness, for instance; its pleasing balance of strict and loose formalism; its social, ethical, and moral consciousness; its striking vividness and immediacy, to name but a few of the many. My argument is that, seeking to identify the keystone element, the one that separates Heaney from the field--including the impressive field of talented poets from Northern Ireland, who were his contemporaries, his rivals and friends--we should name tone as that single most important characteristic. In interviews and in his own prose Heaney demonstrated how important to him were a wide range of \"international poets\": the contemporary Eastern Europeans Joseph Brodsky, Czeslaw Milosz, Zbigniew Herbert, Osip Mandelstam and others; American poets like Robert Lowell, Robert Frost, T.S. Eliot, and Elizabeth Bishop; the classical Greek dramatists; Dante. Further, a stylistic evolution taking place is manifest in Heaney's work, from the early Mossbawn-centered world of the first four books, to the more topically wide-ranging middle and late periods. At some point, maybe around the late 1970s, Heaney became more \"cosmopolitan\", and the shift seems to have coincided with his growing interest in the Eastern Europeans. Examining the full body of work by that group suggests what seems a reasonable description of the international style, largely by highlighting what it is not: local, obviously, but also historical. It is poetry not set in a specific place and time--at least not on its surface and whose language does not tend to dialect, its images to any particular cultural milieu. Cosmopolitan, universal, and parabolic are other terms sometimes used as roughly synonymous with international, terms signifying a kind of poetry that seems to hover in air, tethered to the globe by invisible cables, shadowy anchorages. The local worlds from which the poets originate are hinted at but not filled out, not given full-blooded life. Of course, in the case of Milosz some poems do make reference to specific places, but they seem the exception rather than the rule. To choose as an example of the rule in Milosz, at least regarding style, I would offer the following, a poem called \"What Once Was Great\" (1988: 127) which he wrote in Polish in 1959, while in exile near Paris, and later translated into English: What once was great, now appeared small. Kingdoms were fading like snow-covered bronze. What once could smite, now smites no more. Celestial earths roll on and shine. Stretched on the grass by the bank of a river, As long, long ago, I launch my boats of bark. Notice that, whatever cultural baggage the reader brings to Milosz--and certainly his contemporary Polish readers, including fellow exiles in France, would have associated these \"Kingdoms\" with their beloved homeland--this could be happening anywhere. …","PeriodicalId":29863,"journal":{"name":"EIGSE-A JOURNAL OF IRISH STUDIES","volume":"104 1","pages":"190-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIGSE-A JOURNAL OF IRISH STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24162/EI2015-6567","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last decades of his life Seamus Heaney occupied the position of "world poet" and outsold--or so it was widely held--all other poets writing in English. Such popularity, accessibility--such transferability--would suggest, among other things, that his work manifests at least some semblance of an "international style". Admittedly, it is a pretty slippery term. But it is worth asking, by what other means than manifesting a "style" with an "international" appeal could Heaney have attracted such a large international audience? What would make readers as far-flung as West Texas and Eastern Siberia find his work so compelling? Roy Foster, professor of poetry at Oxford and a Heaney scholar, calls him flatly "an international poet" (2013), and as much as one may want to associate Heaney with a small farm in Co. Derry, Northern Ireland, it is hard to argue that Foster is not in some sense correct. But Foster also acknowledges that as much as anything else Heaney's tone--"the worlds below" (2013), as he glosses his use of the term--may be the most important characteristic of his work. One might reasonably argue that many aspects of Heaney's poetry are worthy of consideration and contribute to its overall success: its linguistic richness, for instance; its pleasing balance of strict and loose formalism; its social, ethical, and moral consciousness; its striking vividness and immediacy, to name but a few of the many. My argument is that, seeking to identify the keystone element, the one that separates Heaney from the field--including the impressive field of talented poets from Northern Ireland, who were his contemporaries, his rivals and friends--we should name tone as that single most important characteristic. In interviews and in his own prose Heaney demonstrated how important to him were a wide range of "international poets": the contemporary Eastern Europeans Joseph Brodsky, Czeslaw Milosz, Zbigniew Herbert, Osip Mandelstam and others; American poets like Robert Lowell, Robert Frost, T.S. Eliot, and Elizabeth Bishop; the classical Greek dramatists; Dante. Further, a stylistic evolution taking place is manifest in Heaney's work, from the early Mossbawn-centered world of the first four books, to the more topically wide-ranging middle and late periods. At some point, maybe around the late 1970s, Heaney became more "cosmopolitan", and the shift seems to have coincided with his growing interest in the Eastern Europeans. Examining the full body of work by that group suggests what seems a reasonable description of the international style, largely by highlighting what it is not: local, obviously, but also historical. It is poetry not set in a specific place and time--at least not on its surface and whose language does not tend to dialect, its images to any particular cultural milieu. Cosmopolitan, universal, and parabolic are other terms sometimes used as roughly synonymous with international, terms signifying a kind of poetry that seems to hover in air, tethered to the globe by invisible cables, shadowy anchorages. The local worlds from which the poets originate are hinted at but not filled out, not given full-blooded life. Of course, in the case of Milosz some poems do make reference to specific places, but they seem the exception rather than the rule. To choose as an example of the rule in Milosz, at least regarding style, I would offer the following, a poem called "What Once Was Great" (1988: 127) which he wrote in Polish in 1959, while in exile near Paris, and later translated into English: What once was great, now appeared small. Kingdoms were fading like snow-covered bronze. What once could smite, now smites no more. Celestial earths roll on and shine. Stretched on the grass by the bank of a river, As long, long ago, I launch my boats of bark. Notice that, whatever cultural baggage the reader brings to Milosz--and certainly his contemporary Polish readers, including fellow exiles in France, would have associated these "Kingdoms" with their beloved homeland--this could be happening anywhere. …
学习“远远超出”他的母语:希尼的语气和国际风格
在谢默斯·希尼生命的最后几十年里,他占据了“世界诗人”的地位,其作品的销量超过了所有其他用英语写作的诗人——或者说人们普遍这么认为。如此受欢迎、平易近人、如此可转移性,在其他方面表明,他的作品至少表现出某种“国际风格”。不可否认,这是一个相当狡猾的术语。但值得一问的是,除了展示一种具有“国际”吸引力的“风格”之外,希尼还能通过什么方式吸引如此多的国际观众?是什么让远在西德克萨斯和东西伯利亚的读者都觉得他的作品如此引人入胜?牛津大学诗歌教授、希尼学者罗伊·福斯特(Roy Foster)直截了当地称他为“一位国际诗人”(2013年)。尽管人们可能会把希尼与北爱尔兰德里郡的一个小农场联系在一起,但很难说福斯特在某种意义上是不对的。但福斯特也承认,希尼的语气——《下面的世界》(the worlds below, 2013)——可能是他作品中最重要的特征,这是他对这个词的解释。人们可能会合理地认为,希尼诗歌的许多方面值得考虑,并有助于其整体成功:例如,它的语言丰富性;形式主义的严格与宽松的令人愉悦的平衡;它的社会、伦理和道德意识;它惊人的生动和直接,仅举几例。我的观点是,在寻找将希尼与这个领域——包括与他同时代、竞争对手和朋友、来自北爱尔兰的才华横溢的诗人——区分开来的关键因素时,我们应该把音调列为最重要的一个特征。在采访和他自己的散文中,希尼展示了各种“国际诗人”对他的重要性:当代东欧人约瑟夫·布罗茨基、切斯瓦夫·米沃什、兹比格涅夫·赫伯特、奥西普·曼德尔施塔姆等人;罗伯特·洛厄尔、罗伯特·弗罗斯特、T.S.艾略特和伊丽莎白·毕晓普等美国诗人;古典希腊剧作家;但丁。此外,在希尼的作品中,从前四本书早期以摩斯班为中心的世界,到主题更广泛的中后期,风格的演变也很明显。在某种程度上,也许是在20世纪70年代末,希尼变得更加“国际化”,而这种转变似乎与他对东欧人日益增长的兴趣相吻合。仔细研究该团体的全部作品,我们会发现,对国际风格的描述似乎是合理的,主要是通过强调它不是什么:显然是地方性的,但也是历史性的。它是一种不以特定地点和时间为背景的诗歌——至少在表面上不是这样,它的语言不倾向于方言,它的形象不倾向于任何特定的文化环境。世界主义(Cosmopolitan)、普遍的(universal)和抛物线式的(抛物线式的)是其他一些有时被用作国际(international)大致同义词的术语,这些术语意味着一种似乎悬浮在空中的诗歌,通过看不见的缆绳、阴影般的锚点与地球相连。诗人所来自的地方世界被暗示了,但没有被填满,没有被赋予充满活力的生命。当然,在米沃什的例子中,有些诗确实提到了特定的地方,但它们似乎是例外,而不是规则。为了选择一个例子来说明米沃什的规则,至少在风格方面,我将提供以下的例子,一首名为“曾经是伟大的”(1988:127)的诗,这首诗是他1959年在巴黎附近流亡时用波兰语写的,后来被翻译成英语:曾经是伟大的,现在显得渺小了。王国像覆雪的青铜一样衰落。曾经能笑的,现在不再笑了。天上的地球滚动着,闪耀着。躺在河边的草地上,就像很久很久以前,我用树皮做的小船。请注意,无论读者给米沃什带来什么文化包袱——当然,他同时代的波兰读者,包括流亡法国的同胞,都会把这些“王国”与他们心爱的祖国联系在一起——这可能发生在任何地方。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EIGSE-A JOURNAL OF IRISH STUDIES
EIGSE-A JOURNAL OF IRISH STUDIES LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书