A Comparative Study of Surgical Outcomes between the Adjustable Suture Technique and Conventional Technique in Strabismus Surgery

Q4 Medicine
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Surgical Outcomes between the Adjustable Suture Technique and Conventional Technique in Strabismus Surgery","authors":"","doi":"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.04.13838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the success rate between adjustable suture technique and conventional technique in rectus muscle surgery.\n\nMaterials and Methods: The present study was a retrospective review of patients aged 10 and above underwent rectus muscle surgery between 2010 and 2018. Patients were classified into two groups according to the surgical techniques, the adjustable group and the conventional group. Preoperative and postoperative orthoptic evaluation including angle of deviation, sensory outcomes, and reoperation rate were collected. The primary outcome was surgical success rate at two years postoperatively, with success defined as ocular alignment within 10 prism diopters (PD) for horizontal rectus muscle surgery or within 5 PD for vertical rectus muscle surgery. The secondary outcome was reoperation rate and binocular functions improvement two years post-operation.\n\nResults: One hundred fifteen cases in the adjustable group and 90 in the conventional group were identified. Patients in the adjustable group had a higher success rate achieving the target angle after six months, one year, and two years post-operation compared to the conventional group at 77.4% versus 70% (p=0.23), 73.9% versus 65.6% (p=0.19), and 72.2% versus 60% (p=0.066), respectively, but there was no statistically significant difference. Sensory improvement was seen in 43.4% of patients in the conventional group and 42.6% in the adjustable group (p=0.54). Median stereopsis improvement was seen in both groups at 80 to 45 seconds of arc in the adjustable group and 100 to 60 seconds of arc in the conventional group (p=0.67). The reoperation rate was 18.9% in the conventional group and 19.1% in the adjustable group (p=0.97).\n\nConclusion: The adjustable suture technique presented a superior success rate compared to conventional technique though there was no statistically significant difference. A longer follow-up period and larger sample size might be needed to demonstrate statistically significant difference between the two techniques. No significant difference in binocular functions, sensory improvement, or reoperation rate was seen in the present study.\n\nKeywords: Strabismus surgery; Adjustable suture; Conventional suture; Surgical outcome","PeriodicalId":17486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.04.13838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the success rate between adjustable suture technique and conventional technique in rectus muscle surgery. Materials and Methods: The present study was a retrospective review of patients aged 10 and above underwent rectus muscle surgery between 2010 and 2018. Patients were classified into two groups according to the surgical techniques, the adjustable group and the conventional group. Preoperative and postoperative orthoptic evaluation including angle of deviation, sensory outcomes, and reoperation rate were collected. The primary outcome was surgical success rate at two years postoperatively, with success defined as ocular alignment within 10 prism diopters (PD) for horizontal rectus muscle surgery or within 5 PD for vertical rectus muscle surgery. The secondary outcome was reoperation rate and binocular functions improvement two years post-operation. Results: One hundred fifteen cases in the adjustable group and 90 in the conventional group were identified. Patients in the adjustable group had a higher success rate achieving the target angle after six months, one year, and two years post-operation compared to the conventional group at 77.4% versus 70% (p=0.23), 73.9% versus 65.6% (p=0.19), and 72.2% versus 60% (p=0.066), respectively, but there was no statistically significant difference. Sensory improvement was seen in 43.4% of patients in the conventional group and 42.6% in the adjustable group (p=0.54). Median stereopsis improvement was seen in both groups at 80 to 45 seconds of arc in the adjustable group and 100 to 60 seconds of arc in the conventional group (p=0.67). The reoperation rate was 18.9% in the conventional group and 19.1% in the adjustable group (p=0.97). Conclusion: The adjustable suture technique presented a superior success rate compared to conventional technique though there was no statistically significant difference. A longer follow-up period and larger sample size might be needed to demonstrate statistically significant difference between the two techniques. No significant difference in binocular functions, sensory improvement, or reoperation rate was seen in the present study. Keywords: Strabismus surgery; Adjustable suture; Conventional suture; Surgical outcome
斜视手术中可调节缝合技术与常规缝合技术的疗效比较研究
目的:比较可调节缝合技术与常规缝合技术在直肌手术中的成功率。材料与方法:本研究对2010年至2018年10岁及以上接受直肌手术的患者进行回顾性分析。根据手术手法将患者分为可调节组和常规组。收集术前和术后的正视评估,包括偏斜角、感觉结果和再手术率。主要终点是术后2年的手术成功率,成功定义为水平直肌手术的双眼屈光度在10棱镜内(PD)或垂直直肌手术的双眼屈光度在5棱镜内(PD)。术后2年复发率和双眼功能改善情况为次要观察指标。结果:可调节组115例,常规组90例。可调节组患者术后6个月、1年、2年达到目标角度的成功率分别为77.4%比70% (p=0.23)、73.9%比65.6% (p=0.19)、72.2%比60% (p=0.066),均高于常规组,但差异无统计学意义。常规组43.4%的患者感觉改善,调节组42.6% (p=0.54)。两组在80 ~ 45秒弧线可调组和100 ~ 60秒弧线常规组中位立体视改善(p=0.67)。常规组再手术率为18.9%,调节组为19.1% (p=0.97)。结论:可调节缝合技术与常规缝合技术相比成功率更高,但差异无统计学意义。可能需要更长的随访期和更大的样本量来证明两种技术在统计学上的显著差异。在本研究中,双眼功能、感觉改善或再手术率无显著差异。关键词:斜视手术;可调缝线;常规缝合;手术结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信