End-expiratory Occlusion Test and Mini-fluid Challenge Test for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Acute Circulatory Failure.

IF 1.2 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-10 DOI:10.4103/jets.jets_44_23
Velmurugan Selvam, Dilip Shende, Rahul Kumar Anand, Lokesh Kashyap, Bikash Ranjan Ray
{"title":"End-expiratory Occlusion Test and Mini-fluid Challenge Test for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Acute Circulatory Failure.","authors":"Velmurugan Selvam, Dilip Shende, Rahul Kumar Anand, Lokesh Kashyap, Bikash Ranjan Ray","doi":"10.4103/jets.jets_44_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Predicting which patients with acute circulatory failure will respond to the fluid by an increase in cardiac output is a daily challenge. End-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) and mini-fluid challenge (MFC) can be used for assessing fluid responsiveness in patients with spontaneous breathing activity, cardiac arrhythmias, low-tidal volume and/or low lung compliance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The objective of the study is to evaluate the value of EEOT and MFC-induced rise in left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) velocity time integral (VTI) in predicting fluid responsiveness in acute circulatory failure in comparison to the passive leg-raising (PLR) test. Hundred critically ill ventilated and sedated patients with acute circulatory failure were studied. LVOT VTI was measured by transthoracic echocardiography before and after EEOT (interrupting the ventilator at end-expiration over 15 s), and before and after MFC (100 ml of Ringer lactate was infused over 1 min). The variation of LVOT VTI after EEOT and the MFC was calculated from the baseline. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of LVOT VTI after EEOT and MFC to predict fluid responsiveness were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PLR, stroke volume (SV) increased by ≥12% in 49 patients, who were defined as responders and 34 patients in whom the increase in SV <12% were defined as nonresponders. A cutoff of 9.1% Change in VTI after MFC (ΔVTI<sub>MFC</sub>) predicted fluid responsiveness with an AUROC of 0.96 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) with sensitivity and specificity of 91.5% and 88.9%, respectively. Change in VTI after EEOT (ΔVTI<sub>EEOT</sub>) >4.3% predicted fluid responsiveness with sensitivity and specificity 89.4% and 88.9%, respectively, with an AUROC of 0.97 (<i>P</i> < 0.001), but in 17 patients, EEOT was not possible because triggering of the ventilator by the patient's inspiratory effort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, in mechanically ventilated patients with acute circulatory failure Δ VTI<sub>MFC</sub> and Δ VTI <sub>EEOT</sub> accurately predicts fluid responsiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":15692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_44_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Predicting which patients with acute circulatory failure will respond to the fluid by an increase in cardiac output is a daily challenge. End-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) and mini-fluid challenge (MFC) can be used for assessing fluid responsiveness in patients with spontaneous breathing activity, cardiac arrhythmias, low-tidal volume and/or low lung compliance.

Methods: The objective of the study is to evaluate the value of EEOT and MFC-induced rise in left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) velocity time integral (VTI) in predicting fluid responsiveness in acute circulatory failure in comparison to the passive leg-raising (PLR) test. Hundred critically ill ventilated and sedated patients with acute circulatory failure were studied. LVOT VTI was measured by transthoracic echocardiography before and after EEOT (interrupting the ventilator at end-expiration over 15 s), and before and after MFC (100 ml of Ringer lactate was infused over 1 min). The variation of LVOT VTI after EEOT and the MFC was calculated from the baseline. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of LVOT VTI after EEOT and MFC to predict fluid responsiveness were determined.

Results: After PLR, stroke volume (SV) increased by ≥12% in 49 patients, who were defined as responders and 34 patients in whom the increase in SV <12% were defined as nonresponders. A cutoff of 9.1% Change in VTI after MFC (ΔVTIMFC) predicted fluid responsiveness with an AUROC of 0.96 (P < 0.001) with sensitivity and specificity of 91.5% and 88.9%, respectively. Change in VTI after EEOT (ΔVTIEEOT) >4.3% predicted fluid responsiveness with sensitivity and specificity 89.4% and 88.9%, respectively, with an AUROC of 0.97 (P < 0.001), but in 17 patients, EEOT was not possible because triggering of the ventilator by the patient's inspiratory effort.

Conclusion: In conclusion, in mechanically ventilated patients with acute circulatory failure Δ VTIMFC and Δ VTI EEOT accurately predicts fluid responsiveness.

呼气末闭塞试验和微量液体刺激试验预测急性循环衰竭患者的液体反应性。
导读:预测哪些急性循环衰竭患者会因心输出量增加而对液体产生反应是一项日常挑战。呼气末闭塞试验(EEOT)和微量液体刺激(MFC)可用于评估自发性呼吸活动、心律失常、低潮气量和/或低肺顺应性患者的液体反应性。方法:本研究的目的是评价EEOT和mfc诱导的左心室流出道(LVOT)速度时间积分(VTI)升高与被动抬腿(PLR)试验在预测急性循环衰竭时液体反应性方面的价值。对100例重症急性循环衰竭患者进行了通气和镇静治疗。通过经胸超声心动图测量LVOT VTI在EEOT前后(呼气末中断呼吸机超过15 s)和MFC前后(在1分钟内输注100 ml乳酸林格液)。从基线计算EEOT和MFC后LVOT VTI的变化。测定EEOT和MFC后LVOT VTI预测流体反应的敏感性、特异性和接受者工作特征(AUROC)曲线下面积。结果:PLR后,49例患者的脑卒中容量(SV)增加≥12%,被定义为反应者,其中34例患者SV MFC增加预测液体反应,AUROC为0.96 (P < 0.001),敏感性和特异性分别为91.5%和88.9%。EEOT后VTI的变化(ΔVTIEEOT) >4.3%,预测液体反应的敏感性和特异性分别为89.4%和88.9%,AUROC为0.97 (P < 0.001),但在17例患者中,由于患者的吸气力触发呼吸机而不可能进行EEOT。结论:结论:机械通气急性循环衰竭患者Δ VTIMFC和Δ VTI EEOT能准确预测液体反应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信