What is the Impact of Lumbosciatic Infiltration on the Evolution of Herniated Disc and Dorsolumbar Asthrosis?

K. Ndiaye, Adamou Abbassi, Mbang Dono Djerabe, S. Traore, A. Bonté, Madjouma A. B. Doumbia, Félicien G. Toudjingar, Yannick CANTON. Kessely
{"title":"What is the Impact of Lumbosciatic Infiltration on the Evolution of Herniated Disc and Dorsolumbar Asthrosis?","authors":"K. Ndiaye, Adamou Abbassi, Mbang Dono Djerabe, S. Traore, A. Bonté, Madjouma A. B. Doumbia, Félicien G. Toudjingar, Yannick CANTON. Kessely","doi":"10.4236/WJNS.2021.112012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lumbosciatica is a frequent reason for consultation in general medicine \nand emergency medicine with an estimated incidence between 2% and 14%. There \nare several therapeutic modalities, including infiltrations, which are very \ncontroversial. Based on this observation, we conducted a prospective study in \nwhich 19 patients had undergone epidural and peri-radicular infiltration; the \nepidural was the most represented infiltration in 68.4% of the patients, the \nperi-radicular was in 21.1% of them and the combination of both was in 10.5% of \nthe cases, with only 30.6% of the infiltrations carried out under radioscopy. \nThe molecules used were Triamcinolone Acetonide-based Kenacort and \nMethylprednisolone Acetate-based Depo-Medrol. The evolution of \npost-infiltration pain decreased significantly in 94.7% of cases, with a \nstatistically significant difference (p = 0.04). No complications were observed \nin our patients and none of them had resorted to surgery during the follow-up \nperiod except for a single case of recurrence of pain relieved by periodic \nspaced infiltrations. Despite the small size of our sample, we can conclude \nthat infiltration techniques still have a place in the management of \nLumbosciatica alongside the surgery.","PeriodicalId":23878,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/WJNS.2021.112012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lumbosciatica is a frequent reason for consultation in general medicine and emergency medicine with an estimated incidence between 2% and 14%. There are several therapeutic modalities, including infiltrations, which are very controversial. Based on this observation, we conducted a prospective study in which 19 patients had undergone epidural and peri-radicular infiltration; the epidural was the most represented infiltration in 68.4% of the patients, the peri-radicular was in 21.1% of them and the combination of both was in 10.5% of the cases, with only 30.6% of the infiltrations carried out under radioscopy. The molecules used were Triamcinolone Acetonide-based Kenacort and Methylprednisolone Acetate-based Depo-Medrol. The evolution of post-infiltration pain decreased significantly in 94.7% of cases, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.04). No complications were observed in our patients and none of them had resorted to surgery during the follow-up period except for a single case of recurrence of pain relieved by periodic spaced infiltrations. Despite the small size of our sample, we can conclude that infiltration techniques still have a place in the management of Lumbosciatica alongside the surgery.
腰坐骨浸润对椎间盘突出和腰背动脉粥样硬化的发展有何影响?
腰坐骨神经痛是普通医学和急诊医学就诊的常见原因,估计发病率在2%至14%之间。有几种治疗方式,包括浸润,这是非常有争议的。基于这一观察,我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,其中19例患者接受了硬膜外和神经根周围浸润;硬膜外浸润占68.4%,神经根周围浸润占21.1%,两者合并浸润占10.5%,在x线镜下浸润仅占30.6%。使用的分子是基于曲安奈德的肯纳科特和基于醋酸甲泼尼龙的Depo-Medrol。94.7%的患者浸润后疼痛的演变程度明显降低,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.04)。随访期间,所有患者均未出现并发症,除一例疼痛复发,经周期性间隙浸润缓解外,均未采取手术治疗。尽管我们的样本很小,但我们可以得出结论,浸润技术在手术治疗腰坐骨神经痛中仍然占有一席之地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信