K. Ndiaye, Adamou Abbassi, Mbang Dono Djerabe, S. Traore, A. Bonté, Madjouma A. B. Doumbia, Félicien G. Toudjingar, Yannick CANTON. Kessely
{"title":"What is the Impact of Lumbosciatic Infiltration on the Evolution of Herniated Disc and Dorsolumbar Asthrosis?","authors":"K. Ndiaye, Adamou Abbassi, Mbang Dono Djerabe, S. Traore, A. Bonté, Madjouma A. B. Doumbia, Félicien G. Toudjingar, Yannick CANTON. Kessely","doi":"10.4236/WJNS.2021.112012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lumbosciatica is a frequent reason for consultation in general medicine \nand emergency medicine with an estimated incidence between 2% and 14%. There \nare several therapeutic modalities, including infiltrations, which are very \ncontroversial. Based on this observation, we conducted a prospective study in \nwhich 19 patients had undergone epidural and peri-radicular infiltration; the \nepidural was the most represented infiltration in 68.4% of the patients, the \nperi-radicular was in 21.1% of them and the combination of both was in 10.5% of \nthe cases, with only 30.6% of the infiltrations carried out under radioscopy. \nThe molecules used were Triamcinolone Acetonide-based Kenacort and \nMethylprednisolone Acetate-based Depo-Medrol. The evolution of \npost-infiltration pain decreased significantly in 94.7% of cases, with a \nstatistically significant difference (p = 0.04). No complications were observed \nin our patients and none of them had resorted to surgery during the follow-up \nperiod except for a single case of recurrence of pain relieved by periodic \nspaced infiltrations. Despite the small size of our sample, we can conclude \nthat infiltration techniques still have a place in the management of \nLumbosciatica alongside the surgery.","PeriodicalId":23878,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/WJNS.2021.112012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lumbosciatica is a frequent reason for consultation in general medicine
and emergency medicine with an estimated incidence between 2% and 14%. There
are several therapeutic modalities, including infiltrations, which are very
controversial. Based on this observation, we conducted a prospective study in
which 19 patients had undergone epidural and peri-radicular infiltration; the
epidural was the most represented infiltration in 68.4% of the patients, the
peri-radicular was in 21.1% of them and the combination of both was in 10.5% of
the cases, with only 30.6% of the infiltrations carried out under radioscopy.
The molecules used were Triamcinolone Acetonide-based Kenacort and
Methylprednisolone Acetate-based Depo-Medrol. The evolution of
post-infiltration pain decreased significantly in 94.7% of cases, with a
statistically significant difference (p = 0.04). No complications were observed
in our patients and none of them had resorted to surgery during the follow-up
period except for a single case of recurrence of pain relieved by periodic
spaced infiltrations. Despite the small size of our sample, we can conclude
that infiltration techniques still have a place in the management of
Lumbosciatica alongside the surgery.