André Delbecq: Searcher for complementarities and the good

IF 0.7 0 RELIGION
Ramon J. Aldag
{"title":"André Delbecq: Searcher for complementarities and the good","authors":"Ramon J. Aldag","doi":"10.1080/14766086.2019.1680417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I appreciate this opportunity to convey reflections on my more than four decades of personal and professional interactions with André. André was exceptional in many ways, some of them perhaps not obvious. I joined the University of Wisconsin-Madison faculty in 1973 (where I remain active after 46 years). I met André during my job interview visit in 1972. He immediately impressed me as positive, nurturing, and thoughtful. He took me for a campus tour, culminating with a steep climb up Bascom Hill to our administrative building, Bascom Hall. This was immediately after the anti-war protests and riots at Wisconsin, which led to the bombing death of a researcher at Sterling Hall; the bombing was one of the incidents featured in the still-haunting 1979 documentary, “The War at Home.” Students were charging up the hill toward National Guard members, swarming in what seemed to me like mindless rage. I said, “Those students are attacking the soldiers!” André very calmly responded, “They’re doing that all the time” and we continued to walk on. The scene was vividly real, but somehow surreal, giving me an intriguing initial glimpse into a remarkable personality. My early knowledge of André’s theory and research (especially on the Nominal Group Technique – the NGT) deeply impressed me. There was then quite an interest in the relative merits of nominal (coacting) and interacting groups. With Andy Van de Ven and Dave Gustafson – both superb scholars – André proposed a structured process alternating coacting and interacting groups as appropriate. In my view, the NGT (now used and lauded worldwide) was elegant – recognizing that different group interaction modes were not necessarily alternatives but, properly shepherded, complements. This was a recurring theme for André, the search for complementarities in the face of apparent opposition; it demonstrated to me a richly integrative mindset. André was an early mentor for me, in ways a spiritual guide. I was honored that he invited me to serve as a co-author for a 1974 Health Services Research article on evaluation of health system alternatives, a topic that has continued to intrigue me. André provided counsel ever since and felt like a constant, supportive presence. He provided valuable suggestions – and a superb role model – for many of my professional and personal decisions. It’s hard for me to believe that he left Wisconsin forty years ago. André saw himself as an introvert. Someone casually meeting him may have viewed him as rather reserved and sedate, but he reached out to touch many people in profound","PeriodicalId":46503,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Spirituality & Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Spirituality & Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2019.1680417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I appreciate this opportunity to convey reflections on my more than four decades of personal and professional interactions with André. André was exceptional in many ways, some of them perhaps not obvious. I joined the University of Wisconsin-Madison faculty in 1973 (where I remain active after 46 years). I met André during my job interview visit in 1972. He immediately impressed me as positive, nurturing, and thoughtful. He took me for a campus tour, culminating with a steep climb up Bascom Hill to our administrative building, Bascom Hall. This was immediately after the anti-war protests and riots at Wisconsin, which led to the bombing death of a researcher at Sterling Hall; the bombing was one of the incidents featured in the still-haunting 1979 documentary, “The War at Home.” Students were charging up the hill toward National Guard members, swarming in what seemed to me like mindless rage. I said, “Those students are attacking the soldiers!” André very calmly responded, “They’re doing that all the time” and we continued to walk on. The scene was vividly real, but somehow surreal, giving me an intriguing initial glimpse into a remarkable personality. My early knowledge of André’s theory and research (especially on the Nominal Group Technique – the NGT) deeply impressed me. There was then quite an interest in the relative merits of nominal (coacting) and interacting groups. With Andy Van de Ven and Dave Gustafson – both superb scholars – André proposed a structured process alternating coacting and interacting groups as appropriate. In my view, the NGT (now used and lauded worldwide) was elegant – recognizing that different group interaction modes were not necessarily alternatives but, properly shepherded, complements. This was a recurring theme for André, the search for complementarities in the face of apparent opposition; it demonstrated to me a richly integrative mindset. André was an early mentor for me, in ways a spiritual guide. I was honored that he invited me to serve as a co-author for a 1974 Health Services Research article on evaluation of health system alternatives, a topic that has continued to intrigue me. André provided counsel ever since and felt like a constant, supportive presence. He provided valuable suggestions – and a superb role model – for many of my professional and personal decisions. It’s hard for me to believe that he left Wisconsin forty years ago. André saw himself as an introvert. Someone casually meeting him may have viewed him as rather reserved and sedate, but he reached out to touch many people in profound
andre Delbecq:寻找互补性和好的东西
我很高兴有这个机会来表达我对自己与安德瑞斯40多年的个人和职业交往的感想。安德列在很多方面都是例外的,其中一些可能并不明显。我于1973年加入威斯康辛大学麦迪逊分校(University of Wisconsin-Madison)任教(46年后我仍然活跃在那里)。我是在1972年的一次求职面试中认识安德鲁的。他给我的印象是积极、有教养和体贴。他带我参观了校园,最后爬上巴斯科姆山,来到我们的行政大楼巴斯科姆大厅。这是在威斯康星州的反战抗议和骚乱之后发生的,这场抗议和骚乱导致斯特林大厅(Sterling Hall)的一名研究人员被炸弹炸死;1979年的纪录片《国内战争》(the War at Home)至今仍让人难以忘怀,而爆炸事件就是其中之一。学生们向山上的国民警卫队队员冲去,在我看来,他们的愤怒是盲目的。我说:“那些学生在攻击士兵!”安德烈非常平静地回答说:“他们一直都这么做。”我们继续往前走。这一幕生动真实,但又有些超现实,让我对这位非凡的人物有了一个有趣的初步了解。我早期对安德列的理论和研究(尤其是名义群体技术——NGT)的了解给我留下了深刻的印象。当时,人们对名义(合作)团体和互动团体的相对优点很感兴趣。andr和Andy Van de Ven和Dave Gustafson——两位都是杰出的学者——一起提出了一个结构化的过程,在适当的情况下交替合作和互动小组。在我看来,NGT(现在在世界范围内使用并受到称赞)是优雅的——它认识到不同的群体互动模式不一定是替代,而是适当引导的补充。这是安德列反复出现的主题:面对明显的反对,寻求互补性;它向我展示了一种丰富的综合心态。安德鲁是我早期的导师,某种程度上说是精神导师。我很荣幸他邀请我作为1974年《卫生服务研究》(Health Services Research)一篇关于卫生系统替代方案评估的文章的合著者,这个话题一直让我着迷。从那以后,安德列就一直给我提供建议,感觉自己就像一个一直支持我的人。他为我的许多职业和个人决策提供了宝贵的建议——也是一个极好的榜样。我很难相信他四十年前就离开了威斯康辛州。安德鲁认为自己是一个内向的人。偶然见到他的人可能会觉得他很内向、稳重,但他却深深地打动了很多人
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信