Industrial risks by the coast: how people-place bonds impact acceptance of a red mud recycling project (Riesgos industriales en la costa: cómo afectan los lazos persona-lugar a la aceptación de un proyecto de reciclaje de lodo rojo)

IF 0.7 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Raquel Bertoldo, Thomas Berrhoun, Patricia Merdy
{"title":"Industrial risks by the coast: how people-place bonds impact acceptance of a red mud recycling project (Riesgos industriales en la costa: cómo afectan los lazos persona-lugar a la aceptación de un proyecto de reciclaje de lodo rojo)","authors":"Raquel Bertoldo, Thomas Berrhoun, Patricia Merdy","doi":"10.1080/21711976.2022.2043609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Industries sometimes leaves invisible yet dangerous chemical memories of their activities. Because these compounds are invisible, people rely on heuristics informed in part by people-place relations to make a risk judgment. The Marseille region of France provides an interesting case to analyse how local risks are judged in relation to people-place variables. The perceived risks of a depollution project where ‘red mud’ (an industrial residue) is used to neutralize lead-contaminated soil are analysed in relation to (1) place attachment and (2) trust in several types of organization. Results show that participants with stronger local attachment perceive their local environment as less polluted and consider the project as a greater threat. Furthermore, risks vs. benefits associated with the project are significantly explained by age (associated with perceived risk) and trust in societal organizations (associated with perceived benefits). Discussion considers how the diversity of local publics could lead to widely different reactions to the depollution project across the city’s social tissue.","PeriodicalId":55641,"journal":{"name":"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental","volume":"87 1","pages":"201 - 231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2022.2043609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Industries sometimes leaves invisible yet dangerous chemical memories of their activities. Because these compounds are invisible, people rely on heuristics informed in part by people-place relations to make a risk judgment. The Marseille region of France provides an interesting case to analyse how local risks are judged in relation to people-place variables. The perceived risks of a depollution project where ‘red mud’ (an industrial residue) is used to neutralize lead-contaminated soil are analysed in relation to (1) place attachment and (2) trust in several types of organization. Results show that participants with stronger local attachment perceive their local environment as less polluted and consider the project as a greater threat. Furthermore, risks vs. benefits associated with the project are significantly explained by age (associated with perceived risk) and trust in societal organizations (associated with perceived benefits). Discussion considers how the diversity of local publics could lead to widely different reactions to the depollution project across the city’s social tissue.
沿海地区的工业风险:人与地方之间的联系如何影响红泥回收项目的接受程度
工业活动有时会留下看不见却危险的化学记忆。因为这些化合物是看不见的,人们依赖于启发式的判断,部分是由人与地的关系决定的。法国马赛地区提供了一个有趣的案例来分析如何根据人与地的变量来判断当地的风险。利用“红泥”(工业残留物)来中和铅污染土壤的去污染项目的感知风险分析与(1)地方依恋和(2)对几种类型组织的信任有关。结果表明,具有较强地方依恋的参与者认为他们的当地环境污染较少,并认为项目是更大的威胁。此外,与项目相关的风险与收益显著地被年龄(与感知风险相关)和对社会组织的信任(与感知利益相关)所解释。讨论考虑了当地公众的多样性如何导致城市社会组织对治理污染项目的不同反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信