Experimental and Statistical Study on Black Cotton Soil Modified with Cement–Iron Ore Tailings

P. Yohanna, I. Kanyi, R. K. Etim, Oshioname A Ebere, K. Osinubi
{"title":"Experimental and Statistical Study on Black Cotton Soil Modified with Cement–Iron Ore Tailings","authors":"P. Yohanna, I. Kanyi, R. K. Etim, Oshioname A Ebere, K. Osinubi","doi":"10.46792/FUOYEJET.V6I1.572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The investigation focused on the response of black cotton soil (BCS) treated with mixtures of iron ore tailings (IOT) and cement to varying compaction effort (CE). Preliminary tests showed that the un-treated soil is A-7-6 (22) on the basis of AASHTO protocols of classification while the USCS (Unified Soil Classification System) guidelines placed the soil in CH group. Laboratory tests carried out included cation exchange capacity, CEC, Specific gravity (Gs) and compaction test. Three compaction energy levels (i.e., British Standard heavy (BSH), West African Standard (WAS) and British Standard light (BSL)) were adopted for the compaction test. Test results showed that CEC decreased; Gs and MDD increased while OMC also decreased for all cement contents considered when admixed with the different IOT contents up to 10 % IOT by the soil dry weight. MDD values of 1.58, 1.59, 1.62, 1.64, 1.64 and 1.66 Mg/m 3 were noted for 1% cement and 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10% IOT content compacted with BSL energy. Also, OMC values of 21.2, 20.8, 20.5, 20, 20.3 and 20.2% were noted for 1% cement and 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10% IOT content compacted with BSL energy. Same trend was noted for higher cement concentrations and compactive efforts. Regression models for MDD and OMC, considered as dependent variables while C (cement content), CE, IOT, Gs and PF (percentage of fine) as independent variables were developed using software (Mini-tab R15). The result of regression analysis shows that the independent variables considered greatly influence the dependent variables. ANOVA (Analysis of variance) was use to establish the levels of contributions of cement and IOT to the improvements recorded. Therefore, black cotton soil optimally treated with 4% cement 10% IOT blend and compacted with BSH energy is recommended for soil remediation or geotechnical engineering applications. Keywords — Compaction effort, iron ore tailings, black cotton soil (BCS), Analysis of Variance, regression analysis.","PeriodicalId":15735,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering and Technology","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46792/FUOYEJET.V6I1.572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The investigation focused on the response of black cotton soil (BCS) treated with mixtures of iron ore tailings (IOT) and cement to varying compaction effort (CE). Preliminary tests showed that the un-treated soil is A-7-6 (22) on the basis of AASHTO protocols of classification while the USCS (Unified Soil Classification System) guidelines placed the soil in CH group. Laboratory tests carried out included cation exchange capacity, CEC, Specific gravity (Gs) and compaction test. Three compaction energy levels (i.e., British Standard heavy (BSH), West African Standard (WAS) and British Standard light (BSL)) were adopted for the compaction test. Test results showed that CEC decreased; Gs and MDD increased while OMC also decreased for all cement contents considered when admixed with the different IOT contents up to 10 % IOT by the soil dry weight. MDD values of 1.58, 1.59, 1.62, 1.64, 1.64 and 1.66 Mg/m 3 were noted for 1% cement and 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10% IOT content compacted with BSL energy. Also, OMC values of 21.2, 20.8, 20.5, 20, 20.3 and 20.2% were noted for 1% cement and 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10% IOT content compacted with BSL energy. Same trend was noted for higher cement concentrations and compactive efforts. Regression models for MDD and OMC, considered as dependent variables while C (cement content), CE, IOT, Gs and PF (percentage of fine) as independent variables were developed using software (Mini-tab R15). The result of regression analysis shows that the independent variables considered greatly influence the dependent variables. ANOVA (Analysis of variance) was use to establish the levels of contributions of cement and IOT to the improvements recorded. Therefore, black cotton soil optimally treated with 4% cement 10% IOT blend and compacted with BSH energy is recommended for soil remediation or geotechnical engineering applications. Keywords — Compaction effort, iron ore tailings, black cotton soil (BCS), Analysis of Variance, regression analysis.
水泥-铁矿尾矿改性黑棉土的试验与统计研究
研究了铁尾矿与水泥混合处理的黑棉土(BCS)对不同压实力(CE)的响应。初步试验表明,根据AASHTO分类方案,未处理土壤为A-7-6(22),而USCS(统一土壤分类系统)指南将土壤置于CH组。实验室测试包括阳离子交换容量、CEC、比重(Gs)和压实试验。压实试验采用英国标准重型(BSH)、西非标准(WAS)和英国标准轻型(BSL)三个压实能级。试验结果表明,CEC减小;当与不同物联网含量的水泥混合到土壤干重的10%物联网时,所有水泥含量的Gs和MDD都增加了,而OMC也减少了。1%水泥和0、2、4、6、8和10%物联网与BSL能量压实时,MDD值分别为1.58、1.59、1.62、1.64、1.64和1.66 Mg/m 3。此外,1%水泥和0、2、4、6、8和10%物联网与BSL能量压实时的OMC值分别为21.2、20.8、20.5、20、20.3和20.2%。同样的趋势也出现在水泥浓度和压实强度较高的地方。MDD和OMC作为因变量,C(水泥含量)、CE、IOT、Gs和PF(细粒百分比)作为自变量,使用软件(Mini-tab R15)开发回归模型。回归分析结果表明,考虑的自变量对因变量的影响较大。方差分析(ANOVA)用于确定水泥和物联网对所记录的改进的贡献水平。因此,推荐使用4%水泥、10%物联网混合料和BSH能源压实的黑棉土进行土壤修复或岩土工程应用。关键词:压实力,铁矿尾矿,黑棉土,方差分析,回归分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信