Sequent-type rejection systems for finite-valued non-deterministic logics

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Martin Gius, H. Tompits
{"title":"Sequent-type rejection systems for finite-valued non-deterministic logics","authors":"Martin Gius, H. Tompits","doi":"10.1080/11663081.2023.2244367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A rejection system, also referred to as a complementary calculus, is a proof system axiomatising the invalid formulas of a logic, in contrast to traditional calculi which axiomatise the valid ones. Rejection systems therefore introduce a purely syntactic way of determining non-validity without having to consider countermodels, which can be useful in procedures for automated deduction and proof search. Rejection calculi have first been formally introduced by Łukasiewicz in the context of Aristotelian syllogistic and subsequently rejection systems for many well-known logics have been proposed. In this paper, we deal with rejection systems for so-called non-deterministic finite-valued logics, a special case of non-deterministic many-valued logics which were introduced by Avron and Lev as a generalisation of traditional many-valued logics. More specifically, we introduce a systematic method for constructing sequent-style rejection systems for any given non-deterministic finite-valued logic. Furthermore, as special instances of our method, we provide concrete calculi for specific paraconsistent logics which can be characterised in terms of non-deterministic two- and three-valued semantics, respectively.","PeriodicalId":38573,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics","volume":"4 1","pages":"606 - 640"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2023.2244367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A rejection system, also referred to as a complementary calculus, is a proof system axiomatising the invalid formulas of a logic, in contrast to traditional calculi which axiomatise the valid ones. Rejection systems therefore introduce a purely syntactic way of determining non-validity without having to consider countermodels, which can be useful in procedures for automated deduction and proof search. Rejection calculi have first been formally introduced by Łukasiewicz in the context of Aristotelian syllogistic and subsequently rejection systems for many well-known logics have been proposed. In this paper, we deal with rejection systems for so-called non-deterministic finite-valued logics, a special case of non-deterministic many-valued logics which were introduced by Avron and Lev as a generalisation of traditional many-valued logics. More specifically, we introduce a systematic method for constructing sequent-style rejection systems for any given non-deterministic finite-valued logic. Furthermore, as special instances of our method, we provide concrete calculi for specific paraconsistent logics which can be characterised in terms of non-deterministic two- and three-valued semantics, respectively.
有限值非确定性逻辑的序列型拒绝系统
拒绝系统,也被称为互补演算,是一个证明系统,它将逻辑的无效公式公理化,而传统演算则将有效公式公理化。因此,拒绝系统引入了一种纯粹的语法方式来确定非有效性,而不必考虑反模型,这在自动演绎和证明搜索过程中很有用。在亚里士多德三段论的背景下,拒绝演绎法首先由Łukasiewicz正式引入,随后许多著名逻辑的拒绝系统被提出。在本文中,我们处理所谓的非确定性有限值逻辑的拒绝系统,这是由Avron和Lev作为传统多值逻辑的推广引入的非确定性多值逻辑的一种特殊情况。更具体地说,我们引入了一种系统的方法来构造任何给定的非确定性有限值逻辑的顺序式拒绝系统。此外,作为我们方法的特殊实例,我们提供了具体的可分别用非确定性二值和三值语义表征的特定副一致逻辑的演算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics
Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信