Babylonian Jewish Society: The Evidence of the Incantation Bowls

Simcha Gross, Avigail Manekin-Bamberger
{"title":"Babylonian Jewish Society: The Evidence of the Incantation Bowls","authors":"Simcha Gross, Avigail Manekin-Bamberger","doi":"10.1353/jqr.2022.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Since their discovery, the Jewish Babylonian Aramaic incantation bowls have typically been understood to represent “popular” Jewish religious practice that stood in marked contrast with the scholastic rabbinic elite. As a result of this characterization, the usefulness of the bowls for understanding Babylonian Jewish society and the position of the rabbis within it has remained largely unexplored. With the continued publication and study of the bowls, however, the dichotomy between the world of the learned elites and the masses allegedly responsible for the bowls has become increasingly difficult to maintain. This article argues that the Jewish Babylonian Aramaic incantation bowls do not constitute a single corpus; rather, they were produced by different groups of scribes, some of whom consistently employed recognizable Jewish literature from a variety of genres and eschewed non-Jewish invocations. Moreover, we demonstrate how some bowl scribes invoke in an unprecedented manner not only rabbis of the distant past but also local rabbis, the rabbinic class, and even rabbinic academy heads. This evidence suggests that some bowls scribes had greater intellectual and social proximity to the rabbis, rendering a more complicated depiction of Babylonian Jewish society.","PeriodicalId":22606,"journal":{"name":"The Jewish Quarterly Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"1 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Jewish Quarterly Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jqr.2022.0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:Since their discovery, the Jewish Babylonian Aramaic incantation bowls have typically been understood to represent “popular” Jewish religious practice that stood in marked contrast with the scholastic rabbinic elite. As a result of this characterization, the usefulness of the bowls for understanding Babylonian Jewish society and the position of the rabbis within it has remained largely unexplored. With the continued publication and study of the bowls, however, the dichotomy between the world of the learned elites and the masses allegedly responsible for the bowls has become increasingly difficult to maintain. This article argues that the Jewish Babylonian Aramaic incantation bowls do not constitute a single corpus; rather, they were produced by different groups of scribes, some of whom consistently employed recognizable Jewish literature from a variety of genres and eschewed non-Jewish invocations. Moreover, we demonstrate how some bowl scribes invoke in an unprecedented manner not only rabbis of the distant past but also local rabbis, the rabbinic class, and even rabbinic academy heads. This evidence suggests that some bowls scribes had greater intellectual and social proximity to the rabbis, rendering a more complicated depiction of Babylonian Jewish society.
巴比伦犹太社会:咒语碗的证据
摘要:自发现以来,犹太人的巴比伦阿拉姆语咒语碗通常被理解为代表“流行的”犹太宗教习俗,与学术拉比精英形成鲜明对比。由于这一特征,这些碗对于了解巴比伦犹太社会和拉比在其中的地位的有用性在很大程度上仍未被探索。然而,随着对碗的继续出版和研究,学术界精英和据称对碗负责的大众之间的二分法变得越来越难以维持。本文认为,犹太人巴比伦阿拉姆语咒语碗不构成一个单一的语料库;相反,它们是由不同的文士群体创作的,其中一些人一直使用各种体裁中可识别的犹太文学,并避免使用非犹太文献。此外,我们还展示了一些碗抄写员如何以前所未有的方式不仅调用遥远过去的拉比,还调用当地的拉比,拉比阶级,甚至拉比学院的负责人。这一证据表明,一些碗文士在智力和社会上与拉比有更大的联系,从而对巴比伦犹太社会进行了更复杂的描绘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信