Comparative Analysis Of Oil Company’s Corporate Social Responsibility Operating in Different Environments (Nigeria and USA)

I. B. Wulo, Y. Mohammed, Y. Djauro, D. Mohammed, U. A. Usman, H. Sadiq, M. Kodomi, A. K. Gazali, H. I. Kamale, Y. Ibrahim
{"title":"Comparative Analysis Of Oil Company’s Corporate Social Responsibility Operating in Different Environments (Nigeria and USA)","authors":"I. B. Wulo, Y. Mohammed, Y. Djauro, D. Mohammed, U. A. Usman, H. Sadiq, M. Kodomi, A. K. Gazali, H. I. Kamale, Y. Ibrahim","doi":"10.9790/2402-1106033441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is an attempt at finding the institutional trajectories of Royal Dutch Shell operations concerning the question of Corporate Social Responsibility/Social Investment (CSR/SI) strategies in two different environments i.e. The United States and Nigeria. In the quest to ascertain these facts and variables, the question of adequacy of this responsibility and the policy framework of Royal Dutch Shell has become a subject of concern being that issues of corporate strategies towards different states and communities around the globe has raised questions of disparate arrangements, approaches and attitudes.A perusal of various literature and reports, including the Social Investment Disclosure in the sustainability report of the Royal Dutch Shell (2012), as well as economic indices and demographic data suggest how the question of CSR is a field amass with facts and figures about how differently global conglomerates approach their corporate responsibility toward host communities. The subject of CSR/SI strategies as contained in the analysis of the sustainability report of the Royal Dutch Shell (2012) states that in Nigeria. Yet, the Key Performance Indicators (KPI) reveals some level of inadequacy of the company’s Social Investment (SI) programmes in Nigeria as compared to the United State.), and the “Lack of Goodwill” Indicators designed by IPIECA (2008), bring to the fore the demographic and socio-economic indices of the two environments, which give an insight into issues that include ethical considerations and limitations. Most of the thematic issues show that the Royal Dutch Shell has in place diverse social and voluntary investments programs. Keywards: Environment, Corporate Social Responsibility, Niger-Delta and Oil & gas","PeriodicalId":14546,"journal":{"name":"IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology","volume":"29 1","pages":"34-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-1106033441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is an attempt at finding the institutional trajectories of Royal Dutch Shell operations concerning the question of Corporate Social Responsibility/Social Investment (CSR/SI) strategies in two different environments i.e. The United States and Nigeria. In the quest to ascertain these facts and variables, the question of adequacy of this responsibility and the policy framework of Royal Dutch Shell has become a subject of concern being that issues of corporate strategies towards different states and communities around the globe has raised questions of disparate arrangements, approaches and attitudes.A perusal of various literature and reports, including the Social Investment Disclosure in the sustainability report of the Royal Dutch Shell (2012), as well as economic indices and demographic data suggest how the question of CSR is a field amass with facts and figures about how differently global conglomerates approach their corporate responsibility toward host communities. The subject of CSR/SI strategies as contained in the analysis of the sustainability report of the Royal Dutch Shell (2012) states that in Nigeria. Yet, the Key Performance Indicators (KPI) reveals some level of inadequacy of the company’s Social Investment (SI) programmes in Nigeria as compared to the United State.), and the “Lack of Goodwill” Indicators designed by IPIECA (2008), bring to the fore the demographic and socio-economic indices of the two environments, which give an insight into issues that include ethical considerations and limitations. Most of the thematic issues show that the Royal Dutch Shell has in place diverse social and voluntary investments programs. Keywards: Environment, Corporate Social Responsibility, Niger-Delta and Oil & gas
不同环境下石油公司企业社会责任的比较分析(尼日利亚与美国)
本研究试图找出荷兰皇家壳牌公司在美国和尼日利亚两种不同环境下关于企业社会责任/社会投资(CSR/SI)战略问题的制度轨迹。在确定这些事实和变量的过程中,这种责任的充分性问题和荷兰皇家壳牌的政策框架已经成为人们关注的主题,因为公司对全球不同国家和社区的战略问题引发了不同安排、方法和态度的问题。仔细阅读各种文献和报告,包括荷兰皇家壳牌公司(Royal Dutch Shell)可持续发展报告中的社会投资披露(2012),以及经济指数和人口统计数据,可以看出,企业社会责任问题是一个充满事实和数据的领域,反映了全球企业集团如何以不同的方式对待其对东道国的企业责任。荷兰皇家壳牌公司(2012年)可持续发展报告分析中所载的企业社会责任/社会责任战略主题指出,在尼日利亚。然而,关键绩效指标(KPI)显示,与美国相比,该公司在尼日利亚的社会投资(SI)计划存在一定程度的不足,IPIECA(2008)设计的“缺乏善意”指标突出了这两个环境的人口和社会经济指数,从而深入了解了包括道德考虑和限制在内的问题。大多数主题问题表明,荷兰皇家壳牌公司已经制定了各种社会和自愿投资计划。关键词:环境,企业社会责任,尼日利亚三角洲,石油天然气
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信