Receiving Water Quality Monitoring for Assessment of Storm Water Runoff Impacts, A Case Study

Scott M. Taylor
{"title":"Receiving Water Quality Monitoring for Assessment of Storm Water Runoff Impacts, A Case Study","authors":"Scott M. Taylor","doi":"10.1061/40430(1999)140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A receiving water quality monitoring program was developed to measure beneficial use impacts resulting from toxicity in storm water runoff. Significant toxicity has been identified through field sampling in San Diego Creek, the primary tributary to Upper Newport Bay in Orange County California and in Upper Newport Bay. The goals of the water quality monitoring program are to determine the persistence, fate and significance of the aquatic toxicity in the receiving water. The program is being completed in two phases reflecting the funding from two EPA grants. A 205(j) planning grant is providing resources for characterizing the toxicity in the receiving waters using standard EPA tests. A 319(h) implementation grant is providing resources for determining the source of the toxicity in the watershed, and ultimately, to develop source control BMPs for the constituents identified as a part of the planning portion of the program. The initial receiving water testing began in the fall of 1997. To date, there is toxicity to Ceriodaphnia (freshwater zooplankton), Mysidopsis bahia (marine zooplankton), and, in an isolated case, Pimphales promelas (fathead minnow larvae). About one-half of the toxicity has been identified through directed Toxicity Investigation Evaluations (TIEs) as resulting from organophosphorous pesticides. The remaining toxicity was not identified through a conventional TIE. Additional investigation is currently underway to identify the compounds responsible for the unidentified portion of the toxicity and the significance of the toxicity in the Bay to aquatic life. Background In most cases, conventional water quality monitoring is carried out by measuring a suite of chemical constituents at various locations at a fixed, sampling frequency. The data may be compared to U.S. EPA water quality criteria and/or state standards based on the EPA criteria. Exceedance of the criterion values represents an “impaired” water body that requires action to eliminate the exceedance.","PeriodicalId":12601,"journal":{"name":"GeologyRN: Water Resources Engineering (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeologyRN: Water Resources Engineering (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/40430(1999)140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A receiving water quality monitoring program was developed to measure beneficial use impacts resulting from toxicity in storm water runoff. Significant toxicity has been identified through field sampling in San Diego Creek, the primary tributary to Upper Newport Bay in Orange County California and in Upper Newport Bay. The goals of the water quality monitoring program are to determine the persistence, fate and significance of the aquatic toxicity in the receiving water. The program is being completed in two phases reflecting the funding from two EPA grants. A 205(j) planning grant is providing resources for characterizing the toxicity in the receiving waters using standard EPA tests. A 319(h) implementation grant is providing resources for determining the source of the toxicity in the watershed, and ultimately, to develop source control BMPs for the constituents identified as a part of the planning portion of the program. The initial receiving water testing began in the fall of 1997. To date, there is toxicity to Ceriodaphnia (freshwater zooplankton), Mysidopsis bahia (marine zooplankton), and, in an isolated case, Pimphales promelas (fathead minnow larvae). About one-half of the toxicity has been identified through directed Toxicity Investigation Evaluations (TIEs) as resulting from organophosphorous pesticides. The remaining toxicity was not identified through a conventional TIE. Additional investigation is currently underway to identify the compounds responsible for the unidentified portion of the toxicity and the significance of the toxicity in the Bay to aquatic life. Background In most cases, conventional water quality monitoring is carried out by measuring a suite of chemical constituents at various locations at a fixed, sampling frequency. The data may be compared to U.S. EPA water quality criteria and/or state standards based on the EPA criteria. Exceedance of the criterion values represents an “impaired” water body that requires action to eliminate the exceedance.
接收水质监测评估暴雨径流影响的案例研究
制定了一项接收水质监测计划,以测量暴雨径流中毒性造成的有益使用影响。在加州奥兰治县上纽波特湾的主要支流圣地亚哥溪和上纽波特湾,通过实地抽样发现了显著的毒性。水质监测计划的目标是确定接收水中水生毒性的持久性、命运和重要性。该项目分两个阶段完成,反映了EPA的两笔拨款。205(j)规划拨款正在提供资源,以便使用标准的环境保护局测试来表征接收水中的毒性。319(h)实施拨款为确定流域毒性来源提供资源,并最终为确定为该计划规划部分的组成部分的成分制定源控制bmp。最初的接收水测试于1997年秋季开始。迄今为止,对Ceriodaphnia(淡水浮游动物),Mysidopsis bahia(海洋浮游动物)以及在个别情况下对Pimphales promelas(黑头鲦鱼幼虫)有毒性。通过直接毒性调查评估(TIEs)已确定约一半的毒性是由有机磷农药引起的。剩余的毒性未通过传统的TIE确定。目前正在进行进一步的调查,以确定造成未确定毒性部分的化合物以及海湾毒性对水生生物的重要性。在大多数情况下,传统的水质监测是通过在不同地点以固定的采样频率测量一套化学成分来进行的。这些数据可以与美国环保署水质标准和/或基于EPA标准的州标准进行比较。超过标准值表示水体“受损”,需要采取措施消除超过标准值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信