Beggars, metaphors, and stigma: a missing link in the social history of leprosy.

L. Navon
{"title":"Beggars, metaphors, and stigma: a missing link in the social history of leprosy.","authors":"L. Navon","doi":"10.1093/SHM/11.1.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students of leprosy stigma are at odds over its sources, intensity, and current presistence. On the basis of a study of leprosy in Thailand that combined an archival survey with anthropological field-work, the present article offers a different thesis on these issues from those that have been proposed thus far. The thesis suggests that prior to the discovery of a cure for the disease, its sufferers encountered ambivalent rather than severly stigmatizing reactions. Yet the public's selective exposure-mainly to beggars with the disease-paved the way to the perception of leprosy as the epitome of stigmatization and to its transformation into a metaphor for degradation. Progress in the medical treatment of the disease significantly improved patients' social acceptance but also allowed them to keep their illness a secret. Their consequent disappearance from the public eye turned the figurative use of leprosy in the spoken language into the main source of shaping its image. This development contributed to the irrefutability and perpetuation of the negative image, and even to its intensification to the extent of utter divorce from concrete reality. After expounding this thesis, the paper discusses its potential contribution to resolving the disputes over the roots, severity, and persistence of leprosy stigma on the international level.","PeriodicalId":68213,"journal":{"name":"医疗社会史研究","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"医疗社会史研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/SHM/11.1.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Students of leprosy stigma are at odds over its sources, intensity, and current presistence. On the basis of a study of leprosy in Thailand that combined an archival survey with anthropological field-work, the present article offers a different thesis on these issues from those that have been proposed thus far. The thesis suggests that prior to the discovery of a cure for the disease, its sufferers encountered ambivalent rather than severly stigmatizing reactions. Yet the public's selective exposure-mainly to beggars with the disease-paved the way to the perception of leprosy as the epitome of stigmatization and to its transformation into a metaphor for degradation. Progress in the medical treatment of the disease significantly improved patients' social acceptance but also allowed them to keep their illness a secret. Their consequent disappearance from the public eye turned the figurative use of leprosy in the spoken language into the main source of shaping its image. This development contributed to the irrefutability and perpetuation of the negative image, and even to its intensification to the extent of utter divorce from concrete reality. After expounding this thesis, the paper discusses its potential contribution to resolving the disputes over the roots, severity, and persistence of leprosy stigma on the international level.
乞丐、隐喻和耻辱:麻风病社会史上缺失的一环。
麻风病污名的学生对其来源、强度和目前存在的情况存在分歧。在对泰国麻风病研究的基础上,结合了档案调查和人类学实地调查,本文提供了一个与迄今为止提出的问题不同的论点。这篇论文表明,在发现治疗艾滋病的方法之前,艾滋病患者遇到的不是严重的污名化反应,而是矛盾的反应。然而,公众对麻风病的选择性曝光——主要是对患有这种疾病的乞丐的曝光——为麻风病被视为耻辱的象征铺平了道路,并将其转变为堕落的隐喻。这种疾病的医学治疗的进步大大提高了患者的社会接受度,但也使他们能够对自己的病情保密。它们随之从公众视野中消失,使得口头语言中对麻风病的比喻用法成为塑造其形象的主要来源。这种发展助长了负面形象的不可辩驳性和永久化,甚至使其加剧到与具体现实完全脱节的程度。在阐述了这篇论文之后,本文讨论了它对解决国际层面上关于麻风病耻感的根源、严重性和持久性的争议的潜在贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
140
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信