Differences in Modulation of Brain Responses to Emotional Stimuli in Men and Women with Bipolar Depression

E. Mnatsakanian, V. Kryukov, A.S. Zharkova, V. Krasnov
{"title":"Differences in Modulation of Brain Responses to Emotional Stimuli in Men and Women with Bipolar Depression","authors":"E. Mnatsakanian, V. Kryukov, A.S. Zharkova, V. Krasnov","doi":"10.31550/1727-2378-2022-21-8-72-77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study Objective: To investigate the prognostic and therapeutically significant characteristics in neurophysiological reactivity of male and female patients with bipolar depression. Study Design: comparative controlled non-randomized clinical experimental study. Materials and Methods. 53 patients (26 men and 27 women) with bipolar depression were examined before the start of their psychopharmacotherapy. They were aged from 21 to 59 years. There were no significant differences between men and women on the Hamilton Depression and Anxiety Scale. The groups of healthy volunteers included 23 men and 29 women of the corresponding age. The participants sorted the photos, 80 of which were images of angry/aggressive people or animals, and 80 had neutral expressions. Simple figures (keys) were displayed 2 seconds before the pictures, their connection with the photographs was not explained. A 128-channel electroencephalogram was recorded and the brain responses elicited by the keys were analyzed. Differences (p < 0.05) between neutral and emotional conditions were defined as emotional modulation (EM). Study Results. EM differences in male and female patients were more pronounced than in the control groups. In women with bipolar depression, EM was consistently located in the posterior areas of the cortex from 100 ms to the end of the analysis period. The EM for the P100 component was missing, and the EM topography for P200 was closer to normal than in men. The EM of components N170 and P380 in patients differed depending on their sex and differed from EM of healthy controls of the same sex. Conclusions. The EM of the brain activity in patients with bipolar depression differs from the EM of healthy people. The differences depend on the gender of the patient and affect several components of the evoked brain activity. This suggests that it is important to take into account the gender of the subjects when studying affective disorders in patients. Keywords: emotional modulation, high-density EEG, bipolar depression, implicit learning, facial expression, anger.","PeriodicalId":11479,"journal":{"name":"Doctor.Ru","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Doctor.Ru","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2022-21-8-72-77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study Objective: To investigate the prognostic and therapeutically significant characteristics in neurophysiological reactivity of male and female patients with bipolar depression. Study Design: comparative controlled non-randomized clinical experimental study. Materials and Methods. 53 patients (26 men and 27 women) with bipolar depression were examined before the start of their psychopharmacotherapy. They were aged from 21 to 59 years. There were no significant differences between men and women on the Hamilton Depression and Anxiety Scale. The groups of healthy volunteers included 23 men and 29 women of the corresponding age. The participants sorted the photos, 80 of which were images of angry/aggressive people or animals, and 80 had neutral expressions. Simple figures (keys) were displayed 2 seconds before the pictures, their connection with the photographs was not explained. A 128-channel electroencephalogram was recorded and the brain responses elicited by the keys were analyzed. Differences (p < 0.05) between neutral and emotional conditions were defined as emotional modulation (EM). Study Results. EM differences in male and female patients were more pronounced than in the control groups. In women with bipolar depression, EM was consistently located in the posterior areas of the cortex from 100 ms to the end of the analysis period. The EM for the P100 component was missing, and the EM topography for P200 was closer to normal than in men. The EM of components N170 and P380 in patients differed depending on their sex and differed from EM of healthy controls of the same sex. Conclusions. The EM of the brain activity in patients with bipolar depression differs from the EM of healthy people. The differences depend on the gender of the patient and affect several components of the evoked brain activity. This suggests that it is important to take into account the gender of the subjects when studying affective disorders in patients. Keywords: emotional modulation, high-density EEG, bipolar depression, implicit learning, facial expression, anger.
双相抑郁症男性和女性对情绪刺激的脑反应调节差异
研究目的:探讨男女双相抑郁症患者神经生理反应性的预后和治疗意义。研究设计:比较对照非随机临床实验研究。材料与方法:对53例双相抑郁症患者(男26例,女27例)进行精神药物治疗前检查。他们的年龄从21岁到59岁不等。在汉密尔顿抑郁和焦虑量表上,男女之间没有显著差异。健康志愿者组包括23名男性和29名相应年龄的女性。参与者对照片进行分类,其中80张是愤怒/好斗的人或动物的照片,80张是中性的表情。简单的数字(键)在图片前2秒显示,它们与照片的联系没有解释。记录了128通道脑电图,并分析了按键引起的大脑反应。中性状态和情绪状态之间的差异(p < 0.05)被定义为情绪调节(EM)。研究的结果。男性和女性患者的EM差异比对照组更明显。在女性双相抑郁症患者中,从100毫秒到分析期结束,EM始终位于皮质后部区域。P100分量的EM缺失,P200分量的EM形貌比男性更接近正常。N170和P380成分的EM在不同性别的患者中存在差异,且与同性健康对照的EM存在差异。结论。双相抑郁症患者脑活动的电图与健康人的电图不同。这种差异取决于患者的性别,并影响诱发的大脑活动的几个组成部分。这表明,在研究患者的情感性障碍时,考虑受试者的性别是很重要的。关键词:情绪调节,高密度脑电图,双相抑郁症,内隐学习,面部表情,愤怒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信