Legal regulation of counteraction to domestic violence in Russia and Germany: comparative analysis

IF 0.3 Q4 LAW
T. Prikhodko
{"title":"Legal regulation of counteraction to domestic violence in Russia and Germany: comparative analysis","authors":"T. Prikhodko","doi":"10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(4).149-161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject. The article considers a study of regulation of countering domestic violence in Russia and Germany. The author investigates the draft of Russian federal law \"On the prevention of domestic crimes\" No. 1183390-6 and the law of Germany \"On civil protection from acts of violence and persecution\" as well as federal and lands’ legislation in this sphere. Purpose of the study. The comparative study aims to identify the reasons for the draft’s unviability in Russian Federation, in particular, and to search for legislative opportunities to solve the domestic crime’s problems in Russia, in general.Methodology. The article is based on the comparative legal method. Due to this method, the article describes the legal protections against domestic violence in Russia and Germany (at the level of the federation and states), the advantages and disadvantages of each system.The main results. The legal measures in Germany as well as the draft federal law in the Russian Federation contain protective measures that can be applied by police and court. The main feature of German measures from Russian ones is the possibility of temporary violator’s ejection from the occupied housing by issuing a judicial or police order. The simplicity of the procedure allows а victim to receive effective help at any time, even at night and on non-working days. The article analyses the allowability of these measures to the offender from the point of view of basic rights’ interference; notes the position of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany about the police order on temporary eviction: the residence ejection is allowable only when the measure aims at preventing criminal acts. The article draws attention to the technique’ defects of the Russian draft federal law \"On the prevention of domestic crimes\" No. 1183390-6, which require correction in order to improve the domestic violence’ counteraction in Russia.Сonclusions. It is concluded that in the Russian Federation it is necessary to differentiate heterogeneous phenomena in the law, such as victim’s protection from domestic violence and preventive family relationships’ measures, unreasonably mixed together in the draft federal law \"On the prevention of domestic crimes\" No. 1183390-6. Besides the law about victim’s protection from acts of violence and persecution should include significant consequences exactly for the violator. In this regard, the German multi-level protection system consisting of police protective measures, preliminary judicial measures as well as judicial measures can be applied. German practice makes it possible to react quickly to an act of domestic violence and provide the necessary victim’s support. The experience of applying the police order on the temporary eviction in Germany as well as violator rights’ interference may be appropriate for use in Russia.","PeriodicalId":40342,"journal":{"name":"Pravoprimenenie-Law Enforcement Review","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravoprimenenie-Law Enforcement Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(4).149-161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject. The article considers a study of regulation of countering domestic violence in Russia and Germany. The author investigates the draft of Russian federal law "On the prevention of domestic crimes" No. 1183390-6 and the law of Germany "On civil protection from acts of violence and persecution" as well as federal and lands’ legislation in this sphere. Purpose of the study. The comparative study aims to identify the reasons for the draft’s unviability in Russian Federation, in particular, and to search for legislative opportunities to solve the domestic crime’s problems in Russia, in general.Methodology. The article is based on the comparative legal method. Due to this method, the article describes the legal protections against domestic violence in Russia and Germany (at the level of the federation and states), the advantages and disadvantages of each system.The main results. The legal measures in Germany as well as the draft federal law in the Russian Federation contain protective measures that can be applied by police and court. The main feature of German measures from Russian ones is the possibility of temporary violator’s ejection from the occupied housing by issuing a judicial or police order. The simplicity of the procedure allows а victim to receive effective help at any time, even at night and on non-working days. The article analyses the allowability of these measures to the offender from the point of view of basic rights’ interference; notes the position of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany about the police order on temporary eviction: the residence ejection is allowable only when the measure aims at preventing criminal acts. The article draws attention to the technique’ defects of the Russian draft federal law "On the prevention of domestic crimes" No. 1183390-6, which require correction in order to improve the domestic violence’ counteraction in Russia.Сonclusions. It is concluded that in the Russian Federation it is necessary to differentiate heterogeneous phenomena in the law, such as victim’s protection from domestic violence and preventive family relationships’ measures, unreasonably mixed together in the draft federal law "On the prevention of domestic crimes" No. 1183390-6. Besides the law about victim’s protection from acts of violence and persecution should include significant consequences exactly for the violator. In this regard, the German multi-level protection system consisting of police protective measures, preliminary judicial measures as well as judicial measures can be applied. German practice makes it possible to react quickly to an act of domestic violence and provide the necessary victim’s support. The experience of applying the police order on the temporary eviction in Germany as well as violator rights’ interference may be appropriate for use in Russia.
俄罗斯与德国反家庭暴力的法律规制:比较分析
这个话题。本文对俄罗斯和德国的反家庭暴力法规进行了研究。作者研究了俄罗斯第1183390-6号联邦法“关于预防国内犯罪”草案和德国“关于保护公民免受暴力和迫害行为”的法律以及联邦和各州在这一领域的立法。研究目的:比较研究的目的是找出俄罗斯联邦国内刑法不适用的原因,并从总体上寻找解决俄罗斯国内刑法问题的立法契机。本文以比较法为研究基础。由于这种方法,本文描述了俄罗斯和德国(在联邦和州的层面上)对家庭暴力的法律保护,以及每种制度的优缺点。主要结果。德国的法律措施以及俄罗斯联邦的联邦法律草案载有可由警察和法院适用的保护措施。德国措施与俄罗斯措施的主要特点是,可以通过发布司法或警察命令将违规者暂时赶出所占用的住房。程序的简单性使受害者在任何时候,甚至在夜间和非工作日都能得到有效的帮助。本文从基本权利干涉的角度分析了这些措施对行为人的容忍度;注意到德国联邦宪法法院对警察关于临时驱逐的命令的立场:只有在措施旨在防止犯罪行为的情况下,才允许驱逐住所。文章指出,俄罗斯联邦法律草案《关于预防家庭犯罪》第1183390-6号存在技术缺陷,需要对其进行修正,以完善Russia.Сonclusions中对家庭暴力的反制。结论是,在俄罗斯联邦,有必要区分法律中的异质现象,例如保护受害者免受家庭暴力和预防性家庭关系措施,在第1183390-6号联邦法草案“关于预防家庭犯罪”中不合理地混合在一起。此外,关于保护受害者免受暴力和迫害行为的法律应包括对违法者的重大后果。在这方面,可以采用德国的多级保护制度,包括警察保护措施、初步司法措施和司法措施。德国的做法使得对家庭暴力行为作出迅速反应并向受害者提供必要的支持成为可能。德国对临时驱逐适用警察令以及违法者权利干涉的经验在俄罗斯可能是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信