INGUINAL HERNIA – LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN – A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

D. Ion, Oana Ciocirlan, V. Vornicu, D. Păduraru, A. Bolocan, O. Andronic
{"title":"INGUINAL HERNIA – LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN – A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE","authors":"D. Ion, Oana Ciocirlan, V. Vornicu, D. Păduraru, A. Bolocan, O. Andronic","doi":"10.33695/jss.v6i3.293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inguinal hernia is one of the most common surgical pathologies, which appears mainly due to the weakening of the abdominal muscles. Currently, the gold standard in the repair of inguinal hernias by open approach is the Lichtenstein procedure, while the gold standard of laparo-endoscopic procedures are the pre-peritoneal transabdominal technique (TAPP) and the total extraperitoneal technique (TEP). The purpose of this study is to evaluate, for a period of 4 years, the cases of inguinal hernias operated both by laparoscopic and open procedures to analyze their characteristics, under the conditions in which none was imposed as absolute gold standard for groin hernias. The present study was retrospective and descriptive, including a number of 214 cases hospitalized with the diagnosis of inguinal hernia. In the surgery of the groin hernia, both laparoscopic and open procedures have demonstrated their feasibility. Our study shows the preference for open surgery in elderly patients and those with comorbidities, as well as a faster evolution, with earlier discharge in the case of laparoscopic interventions.","PeriodicalId":33248,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Sciences","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33695/jss.v6i3.293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inguinal hernia is one of the most common surgical pathologies, which appears mainly due to the weakening of the abdominal muscles. Currently, the gold standard in the repair of inguinal hernias by open approach is the Lichtenstein procedure, while the gold standard of laparo-endoscopic procedures are the pre-peritoneal transabdominal technique (TAPP) and the total extraperitoneal technique (TEP). The purpose of this study is to evaluate, for a period of 4 years, the cases of inguinal hernias operated both by laparoscopic and open procedures to analyze their characteristics, under the conditions in which none was imposed as absolute gold standard for groin hernias. The present study was retrospective and descriptive, including a number of 214 cases hospitalized with the diagnosis of inguinal hernia. In the surgery of the groin hernia, both laparoscopic and open procedures have demonstrated their feasibility. Our study shows the preference for open surgery in elderly patients and those with comorbidities, as well as a faster evolution, with earlier discharge in the case of laparoscopic interventions.
腹股沟疝-腹腔镜与开放-单中心经验
腹股沟疝是最常见的外科病理之一,其出现主要是由于腹肌的衰弱。目前,开放入路修复腹股沟疝的金标准是Lichtenstein手术,而腹腔镜内镜手术的金标准是腹膜前经腹技术(TAPP)和全腹膜外技术(TEP)。本研究的目的是在4年的时间里,在没有将腹腔镜和开放式手术作为腹股沟疝的绝对金标准的情况下,对腹股沟疝的病例进行评估,分析其特点。本研究是回顾性和描述性的,包括214例住院诊断为腹股沟疝。在腹股沟疝的手术中,腹腔镜和开放手术都证明了它们的可行性。我们的研究表明,老年患者和那些有合并症的患者更倾向于开放手术,并且在腹腔镜干预的情况下,进展更快,出院更早。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信