Comparison of the effects of ivermectin, permethrin, and gamma benzene hexachloride alone and with that of combination therapy for the management of scabies.

S. Dey, S. Agarwal, S. Sagar
{"title":"Comparison of the effects of ivermectin, permethrin, and gamma benzene hexachloride alone and with that of combination therapy for the management of scabies.","authors":"S. Dey, S. Agarwal, S. Sagar","doi":"10.47750/jptcp.2022.845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RESULTS\nThe present study compared three scabicidal agents alone or with combination, the currently considered medicine of choice permethrin, oral ivermectin, and gamma benzene hexachloride in the local population of India. A total of 120 patients were studied. They were randomly divided into four groups -Group A, Group B, Group C, and Group D. Group A received topical 5% permethrin and oral placebo. Group B was given topical placebo cream and oral ivermectin in two dose regimen. Group C received topical 1% gamma benzene hexachloride with oral placebo, and Group D was given topical 5% permethrin and oral ivermectin. The improvement of lesions and pruritus were assessed in the next three follow-ups, i.e., on the 7th day, 14th day, and 28th day along with any adverse drug reactions (ADRs). It was found that Group A had 83%, 90%, 97%, and Group B had 70%, 81%, and 91% improvement of lesions in the three follow-ups respectively. Group C showed 57%, 70%, 86%, and Group D had 82%, 90%, 97% efficiency to decrease lesion count (p>0.05) respectively. Again, Group A observed 77%, 88%, and 94% improvement in pruritus in subsequent follow-ups, while for Group B it was 63%, 76%, and 86%. Group C had 55%, 71%, 85% efficiency, and Group D had recorded 77%, 88%, and 94% improvement to decrease pruritus (p>0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was found to be less in Group B, Group C, and Group D when compared to Group A.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nGroup D or a combination therapy was a better choice for scabies in comparison to other monotherapy due to its better efficacy and safety profile.","PeriodicalId":73904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology = Journal de la therapeutique des populations et de la pharmacologie clinique","volume":"249 1","pages":"e87-e96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology = Journal de la therapeutique des populations et de la pharmacologie clinique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47750/jptcp.2022.845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

RESULTS The present study compared three scabicidal agents alone or with combination, the currently considered medicine of choice permethrin, oral ivermectin, and gamma benzene hexachloride in the local population of India. A total of 120 patients were studied. They were randomly divided into four groups -Group A, Group B, Group C, and Group D. Group A received topical 5% permethrin and oral placebo. Group B was given topical placebo cream and oral ivermectin in two dose regimen. Group C received topical 1% gamma benzene hexachloride with oral placebo, and Group D was given topical 5% permethrin and oral ivermectin. The improvement of lesions and pruritus were assessed in the next three follow-ups, i.e., on the 7th day, 14th day, and 28th day along with any adverse drug reactions (ADRs). It was found that Group A had 83%, 90%, 97%, and Group B had 70%, 81%, and 91% improvement of lesions in the three follow-ups respectively. Group C showed 57%, 70%, 86%, and Group D had 82%, 90%, 97% efficiency to decrease lesion count (p>0.05) respectively. Again, Group A observed 77%, 88%, and 94% improvement in pruritus in subsequent follow-ups, while for Group B it was 63%, 76%, and 86%. Group C had 55%, 71%, 85% efficiency, and Group D had recorded 77%, 88%, and 94% improvement to decrease pruritus (p>0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was found to be less in Group B, Group C, and Group D when compared to Group A. CONCLUSION Group D or a combination therapy was a better choice for scabies in comparison to other monotherapy due to its better efficacy and safety profile.
伊维菌素、氯菊酯和六氯化伽马苯单用与联合治疗疥疮的疗效比较。
结果本研究比较了三种杀疥剂单独或联合使用,目前考虑的药物选择氯菊酯、口服伊维菌素和伽马六氯化苯在印度当地人群中。共研究了120例患者。随机分为A组、B组、C组和d组。A组给予5%氯菊酯外用和口服安慰剂。B组患者给予外用安慰剂乳膏和口服伊维菌素两种给药方案。C组外用1%六氯化苯加口服安慰剂,D组外用5%氯菊酯加口服伊维菌素。在接下来的3次随访中,即第7天、第14天和第28天,评估病变和瘙痒的改善情况以及有无药物不良反应(adr)。三次随访发现,A组病变改善率分别为83%、90%、97%,B组病变改善率分别为70%、81%、91%。C组病变计数减少率为57%、70%、86%,D组病变计数减少率为82%、90%、97% (p>0.05)。同样,A组在随后的随访中观察到77%、88%和94%的瘙痒改善,而B组的瘙痒改善率分别为63%、76%和86%。C组瘙痒症状改善率分别为55%、71%、85%,D组瘙痒症状改善率分别为77%、88%、94% (p < 0.05)。与a组相比,B组、C组和D组的不良反应发生率较低。结论与其他单药治疗相比,D组或联合治疗具有更好的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信