Delivering Personalised Home Care for People with Dementia: An Investigation of Care Providers’ Roles and Responsibilities

Q2 Health Professions
C. Sutcliffe, K. Davies, Saima Ahmed, J. Hughes, D. Challis
{"title":"Delivering Personalised Home Care for People with Dementia: An Investigation of Care Providers’ Roles and Responsibilities","authors":"C. Sutcliffe, K. Davies, Saima Ahmed, J. Hughes, D. Challis","doi":"10.31389/JLTC.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Home care agencies are a critical part of the social care system in England, however little is known of how they perceive their role in delivering personalised care or their approach to supporting people with dementia. \nObjectives: To investigate the perception of home care managers of their capacity and capability to provide care for people living with dementia with a focus on specialist care, and the challenges of delivering personalised support. \nMethods: A qualitative study employing semi-structured interviews (May-October 2018) of ten independent home care managers in England. \nFindings: Three themes were identified. First, managers aimed to provide responsive care, assessing individual needs and family circumstances including addressing social and emotional needs in keeping with a model of personalised care. Second, in responding to commissioning processes, managers found prescriptive specifications constrained delivery of responsive home care. Sharing assessment and care planning with commissioning teams helped managers personalise client care but created tensions. Third, workforce preparedness was a priority, with life skills and experience valued above qualifications. Agencies used different service models, with only a few referring to specialist dementia roles or services. However, all were aiming to increase understanding of dementia across their teams as part of their approach to personalisation. \nLimitations: It was not possible to interview home care workers who may have given alternative viewpoints.","PeriodicalId":73807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of long-term care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of long-term care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31389/JLTC.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Context: Home care agencies are a critical part of the social care system in England, however little is known of how they perceive their role in delivering personalised care or their approach to supporting people with dementia. Objectives: To investigate the perception of home care managers of their capacity and capability to provide care for people living with dementia with a focus on specialist care, and the challenges of delivering personalised support. Methods: A qualitative study employing semi-structured interviews (May-October 2018) of ten independent home care managers in England. Findings: Three themes were identified. First, managers aimed to provide responsive care, assessing individual needs and family circumstances including addressing social and emotional needs in keeping with a model of personalised care. Second, in responding to commissioning processes, managers found prescriptive specifications constrained delivery of responsive home care. Sharing assessment and care planning with commissioning teams helped managers personalise client care but created tensions. Third, workforce preparedness was a priority, with life skills and experience valued above qualifications. Agencies used different service models, with only a few referring to specialist dementia roles or services. However, all were aiming to increase understanding of dementia across their teams as part of their approach to personalisation. Limitations: It was not possible to interview home care workers who may have given alternative viewpoints.
为痴呆症患者提供个性化的家庭护理:护理提供者角色和责任的调查
背景:家庭护理机构是英国社会护理系统的重要组成部分,然而,人们对他们如何看待自己在提供个性化护理方面的作用或他们支持痴呆症患者的方法知之甚少。目的:调查家庭护理管理者对他们为痴呆症患者提供以专科护理为重点的护理的能力和能力的看法,以及提供个性化支持的挑战。方法:采用半结构化访谈(2018年5月- 10月)对英国10名独立家庭护理经理进行定性研究。研究结果:确定了三个主题。首先,管理者的目标是提供响应式护理,评估个人需求和家庭情况,包括解决社会和情感需求,以保持个性化护理模式。其次,在对委托流程的回应中,管理人员发现规范性规范限制了响应式家庭护理的提供。与委托团队共享评估和护理计划有助于管理人员个性化客户护理,但也造成了紧张关系。第三,为劳动力做好准备是一个优先事项,生活技能和经验比资格更重要。各机构使用了不同的服务模式,只有少数机构提到了痴呆症专家的角色或服务。然而,所有人的目标都是在他们的团队中增加对痴呆症的理解,作为他们个性化方法的一部分。局限性:不可能采访可能提供不同观点的家庭护理人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
33 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信