Cross-Ethnic Invariance of BSI-18 in Individuals With Serious Mental Illness: New Perspectives on Measurement Invariance Testing

IF 1.6 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
Rohini Pahwa, J. Brekke, J. Jaccard
{"title":"Cross-Ethnic Invariance of BSI-18 in Individuals With Serious Mental Illness: New Perspectives on Measurement Invariance Testing","authors":"Rohini Pahwa, J. Brekke, J. Jaccard","doi":"10.1086/717517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study examines the psychometric properties of the Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI-18), a measure of psychological distress, across European Americans, African Americans, and Latinos (N = 1,166) with serious mental illnesses. It also critiques traditional practices for evaluating measurement invariance and suggests new strategies (e.g., use of equivalence testing, incorporation of effect size information) for evaluating invariance. Method: To evaluate unidimensionality across different ethnic groups, we used confirmatory factor analysis followed by invariance testing with forward and backward approaches. Results: We explored ethnic differences in the correlational structure of the four BSI-18 subscales (depression, somatization, anxiety, and panic) and ethnic differences in mean levels of the subscales. We found no strong evidence for differences in psychometric properties of the BSI-18 across ethnic groups. Conclusions: The BSI-18 showed reasonable evidence of invariance across ethnic groups. Expanded methods for invariance testing should be considered in place of the more traditional methods.","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"22 1","pages":"755 - 787"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717517","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examines the psychometric properties of the Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI-18), a measure of psychological distress, across European Americans, African Americans, and Latinos (N = 1,166) with serious mental illnesses. It also critiques traditional practices for evaluating measurement invariance and suggests new strategies (e.g., use of equivalence testing, incorporation of effect size information) for evaluating invariance. Method: To evaluate unidimensionality across different ethnic groups, we used confirmatory factor analysis followed by invariance testing with forward and backward approaches. Results: We explored ethnic differences in the correlational structure of the four BSI-18 subscales (depression, somatization, anxiety, and panic) and ethnic differences in mean levels of the subscales. We found no strong evidence for differences in psychometric properties of the BSI-18 across ethnic groups. Conclusions: The BSI-18 showed reasonable evidence of invariance across ethnic groups. Expanded methods for invariance testing should be considered in place of the more traditional methods.
重度精神疾病个体BSI-18的跨种族不变性:测量不变性检验的新视角
目的:本研究考察了欧洲裔美国人、非洲裔美国人和拉丁裔美国人(N = 1166)严重精神疾病患者的心理测量特征——简要症状量表18 (BSI-18),这是一种心理困扰的测量方法。它还批评了评估测量不变性的传统做法,并提出了评估不变性的新策略(例如,使用等效检验,结合效应大小信息)。方法:采用验证性因子分析和前向和后向的不变性检验,对不同民族的单一性进行评价。结果:我们探讨了抑郁、躯体化、焦虑和恐慌4个BSI-18分量表相关结构的民族差异和各分量表平均水平的民族差异。我们没有发现强有力的证据表明BSI-18的心理测量特性在不同种族之间存在差异。结论:BSI-18在不同种族间具有一定的不变性。应该考虑使用扩展的不变性测试方法来代替更传统的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to presenting innovative, rigorous original research on social problems, intervention programs, and policies. By creating a venue for the timely dissemination of empirical findings and advances in research methods, JSSWR seeks to strengthen the rigor of social work research and advance the knowledge in social work and allied professions and disciplines. Special emphasis is placed on publishing findings on the effectiveness of social and health services, including public policies and practices. JSSWR publishes an array of perspectives, research approaches, and types of analyses that advance knowledge useful for designing social programs, developing innovative public policies, and improving social work practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信