Changes in Private Pensions and Income Inequality in Retirement: A Decomposition Analysis by Income Source in Nine European Countries (1986–2018)

IF 2.7 2区 经济学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Laure Doctrinal
{"title":"Changes in Private Pensions and Income Inequality in Retirement: A Decomposition Analysis by Income Source in Nine European Countries (1986–2018)","authors":"Laure Doctrinal","doi":"10.1093/workar/waad017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Private pensions have expanded in recent decades in many European countries, albeit to different extent. As private pensions historically have been more unequally distributed than public pensions, it is reasonable to expect that pension privatization has increased the dispersion of incomes among the retired. However, few studies have empirically tested this claim. The purpose of this study is to assess how the expansion of private pensions affects developments of income inequality among the retired. Using microdata from the Luxembourg Income Study, decomposition analyses of income inequality by income source are conducted around 1986 and 2018 in nine European countries. To account for cross-country variations in the public–private pension mix, the study distinguishes between mature multi-pillar systems, emergent multi-pillar systems, and dominant public systems. The results highlight an interesting paradox. Higher shares of private pensions in retirement incomes have a substantial inequality-increasing effect; yet, overall income inequality among the retired has not necessarily increased, for 2 reasons. First, more equally distributed public pensions in emergent multi-pillar systems and declining shares of capital income in mature multi-pillar systems either fully or partially compensated for increased inequality due to larger shares of private pensions. Second, private pensions became more equally distributed among the retired in most countries.","PeriodicalId":46486,"journal":{"name":"Work Aging and Retirement","volume":"161 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work Aging and Retirement","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waad017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Private pensions have expanded in recent decades in many European countries, albeit to different extent. As private pensions historically have been more unequally distributed than public pensions, it is reasonable to expect that pension privatization has increased the dispersion of incomes among the retired. However, few studies have empirically tested this claim. The purpose of this study is to assess how the expansion of private pensions affects developments of income inequality among the retired. Using microdata from the Luxembourg Income Study, decomposition analyses of income inequality by income source are conducted around 1986 and 2018 in nine European countries. To account for cross-country variations in the public–private pension mix, the study distinguishes between mature multi-pillar systems, emergent multi-pillar systems, and dominant public systems. The results highlight an interesting paradox. Higher shares of private pensions in retirement incomes have a substantial inequality-increasing effect; yet, overall income inequality among the retired has not necessarily increased, for 2 reasons. First, more equally distributed public pensions in emergent multi-pillar systems and declining shares of capital income in mature multi-pillar systems either fully or partially compensated for increased inequality due to larger shares of private pensions. Second, private pensions became more equally distributed among the retired in most countries.
私人养老金变化与退休收入不平等:1986-2018年欧洲九国收入来源的分解分析
近几十年来,私人养老金在许多欧洲国家都有所扩大,尽管程度不同。由于私人养老金历来比公共养老金分配更不平等,因此有理由预期养老金私有化增加了退休人员之间的收入分散。然而,很少有研究对这种说法进行实证检验。本研究的目的是评估私人养老金的扩张如何影响退休人员收入不平等的发展。利用卢森堡收入研究的微观数据,在1986年至2018年前后,对9个欧洲国家按收入来源对收入不平等进行了分解分析。为了考虑公私养老金结构的跨国差异,该研究区分了成熟的多支柱体系、新兴的多支柱体系和主导的公共体系。研究结果凸显了一个有趣的悖论。私人养老金在退休收入中所占比例的提高,会显著加剧不平等;然而,由于两个原因,退休人员之间的总体收入不平等并不一定会增加。首先,在新兴的多支柱体系中,公共养老金的分配更加均匀,而在成熟的多支柱体系中,资本收入份额的下降,完全或部分地弥补了私人养老金份额增加导致的不平等加剧。第二,在大多数国家,私人养恤金在退休人员之间的分配更加平均。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
21.60%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信