Aboriginal service in the First World War: Identity, recognition and the problem of mateship

IF 0.4 Q1 HISTORY
Philippa Scarlett
{"title":"Aboriginal service in the First World War: Identity, recognition and the problem of mateship","authors":"Philippa Scarlett","doi":"10.22459/AH.39.2015.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The popular construction of unconditional mateship, said to make the Australian Imperial Force (AIF) the band of brothers it never was, today overshadows the existence of racism in the AIF, and the fact that the negative treatment Aboriginal servicemen received post-war was often at the hands of those now said to have been their mates. This mateship myth also obscures the failure of white Australia to recognise the service of Aboriginal men. Before examining these intersecting phenomena, I first consider the diversity of the men who comprised the Aboriginal soldiers of the First World War to counter the oversimplification of this group. This masks individual stories and denies identities, including cultural identity, and in doing so reinforces generalisations about Aboriginal mateship. I then examine the contradictions in the observance of the 'Defence Act 1903' (amended 1909) and draw attention to the pragmatism and racism that underpinned the enlistment of Aboriginal men and their relationships within the AIF. Following this, an examination of the post-war treatment and recognition of Aboriginal servicemen exposes the transient reality of the wartime 'mateship' now prominent in discussion of Aboriginal war service.","PeriodicalId":42397,"journal":{"name":"Aboriginal History","volume":"72 1","pages":"163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aboriginal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AH.39.2015.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The popular construction of unconditional mateship, said to make the Australian Imperial Force (AIF) the band of brothers it never was, today overshadows the existence of racism in the AIF, and the fact that the negative treatment Aboriginal servicemen received post-war was often at the hands of those now said to have been their mates. This mateship myth also obscures the failure of white Australia to recognise the service of Aboriginal men. Before examining these intersecting phenomena, I first consider the diversity of the men who comprised the Aboriginal soldiers of the First World War to counter the oversimplification of this group. This masks individual stories and denies identities, including cultural identity, and in doing so reinforces generalisations about Aboriginal mateship. I then examine the contradictions in the observance of the 'Defence Act 1903' (amended 1909) and draw attention to the pragmatism and racism that underpinned the enlistment of Aboriginal men and their relationships within the AIF. Following this, an examination of the post-war treatment and recognition of Aboriginal servicemen exposes the transient reality of the wartime 'mateship' now prominent in discussion of Aboriginal war service.
第一次世界大战中的土著服务:身份,认可和伙伴关系问题
无条件战友关系的普遍构建,据说使澳大利亚帝国军队(AIF)从未像兄弟一样,今天掩盖了AIF中存在的种族主义,事实上,战后土著军人受到的负面待遇往往是在那些现在据说是他们的伴侣的人手中。这种伴侣关系的神话也掩盖了澳大利亚白人未能认识到土著男性的贡献。在研究这些相互交叉的现象之前,我首先考虑一下组成第一次世界大战土著士兵的男性的多样性,以反对对这一群体的过度简化。这掩盖了个人的故事,否认了身份,包括文化身份,这样做强化了对土著伴侣关系的概括。然后,我检查了遵守“1903年国防法案”(1909年修订)的矛盾,并提请注意支持土著人入伍的实用主义和种族主义以及他们在AIF内的关系。在此之后,对战后对土著军人的待遇和认可的研究揭示了战时“伙伴关系”的短暂现实,现在在土著战争服务的讨论中很突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信