[Distal radius fractures--retrospective quality control after conservative and operative therapy].

Ch. Sommer, L. Brendebach, R. Meier, A. Leutenegger
{"title":"[Distal radius fractures--retrospective quality control after conservative and operative therapy].","authors":"Ch. Sommer, L. Brendebach, R. Meier, A. Leutenegger","doi":"10.1024/1023-9332.7.2.68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe distal radius fracture is the most frequent fracture in the adult patient. The wide spectrum of different types of fracture and the coexisting factors make the choice for the optimal treatment difficult. As an interne quality control we retrospectively evaluated all patients with distal radius fractures treated in 1995 at our institution.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe study included 69 adult patients with 71 distal radius fractures. After on average 26 months 58 patients with 59 fractures were clinically and radiologically evaluated. The patients were asked to give supplementary information about their follow-up treatment as well as any remaining physical difficulties and limitations in the daily life. All x-rays of the broken radius were carefully analysed and compared with the opposite side. The final results were evaluated according to the \"Demerit Point System\".\n\n\nRESULTS\nPatients were treated with five different therapeutical methods. 76.3% of the patients showed a very good/good final result. In 56.7% of the cases secondary fracture dislocation occurred; the dislocation-rate of fractures treated with percutaneous k-wires was 93.3%! A clear correlation between secondary displacement and final results was found.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nA main factor for an optimal outcome is the anatomic restoration of length and axis of the distal radius as well as of joint congruency, also moderate angular deformities are well tolerated. Our collective showed an unexpected high rate of secondary displacement, especially in the k-wire group. The reasons for this unsatisfactory event are manifold: too optimistic indication, insufficient follow-up examination in the first four to six weeks, inconsequent change to a more stable fixation method in case of a secondary dislocation. The results of this retrospective evaluation had a major impact on our concept of treatment. The dorso-radial double-plate technique combined with bone graft will be more used in the future especially in younger patients. The new standardised concept is the base of a present prospective study.","PeriodicalId":79425,"journal":{"name":"Swiss surgery = Schweizer Chirurgie = Chirurgie suisse = Chirurgia svizzera","volume":"17 1","pages":"68-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss surgery = Schweizer Chirurgie = Chirurgie suisse = Chirurgia svizzera","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1023-9332.7.2.68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

BACKGROUND The distal radius fracture is the most frequent fracture in the adult patient. The wide spectrum of different types of fracture and the coexisting factors make the choice for the optimal treatment difficult. As an interne quality control we retrospectively evaluated all patients with distal radius fractures treated in 1995 at our institution. METHODS The study included 69 adult patients with 71 distal radius fractures. After on average 26 months 58 patients with 59 fractures were clinically and radiologically evaluated. The patients were asked to give supplementary information about their follow-up treatment as well as any remaining physical difficulties and limitations in the daily life. All x-rays of the broken radius were carefully analysed and compared with the opposite side. The final results were evaluated according to the "Demerit Point System". RESULTS Patients were treated with five different therapeutical methods. 76.3% of the patients showed a very good/good final result. In 56.7% of the cases secondary fracture dislocation occurred; the dislocation-rate of fractures treated with percutaneous k-wires was 93.3%! A clear correlation between secondary displacement and final results was found. CONCLUSION A main factor for an optimal outcome is the anatomic restoration of length and axis of the distal radius as well as of joint congruency, also moderate angular deformities are well tolerated. Our collective showed an unexpected high rate of secondary displacement, especially in the k-wire group. The reasons for this unsatisfactory event are manifold: too optimistic indication, insufficient follow-up examination in the first four to six weeks, inconsequent change to a more stable fixation method in case of a secondary dislocation. The results of this retrospective evaluation had a major impact on our concept of treatment. The dorso-radial double-plate technique combined with bone graft will be more used in the future especially in younger patients. The new standardised concept is the base of a present prospective study.
[桡骨远端骨折——保守和手术治疗后的回顾性质量控制]。
背景:桡骨远端骨折是成人患者中最常见的骨折。不同类型骨折的广谱性和共存的因素使得选择最佳治疗方法变得困难。作为内部质量控制,我们回顾性评估了1995年在我院治疗的所有桡骨远端骨折患者。方法对69例71例桡骨远端骨折的成人患者进行研究。平均26个月后,58例59例骨折患者进行了临床和影像学评估。患者被要求提供关于后续治疗的补充信息,以及日常生活中任何剩余的身体困难和限制。所有骨折桡骨的x光片都被仔细分析,并与另一侧进行了比较。最终成绩根据“扣分制度”进行评定。结果患者采用5种不同的治疗方法。76.3%的患者表现出很好的最终效果。继发性骨折脱位占56.7%;经皮k针治疗骨折脱位率为93.3%!二次位移与最终结果之间存在明显的相关性。结论桡骨远端长度、轴向和关节一致性的解剖恢复是获得最佳治疗效果的主要因素,中度角度畸形也能得到良好的耐受。我们的集体显示出意想不到的高二次位移率,特别是在k线组。造成这种不满意的事件的原因是多方面的:过于乐观的迹象,在最初的4到6周内随访检查不足,在继发性脱位的情况下没有及时更换更稳定的固定方法。这项回顾性评估的结果对我们的治疗理念产生了重大影响。背桡侧双钢板技术结合骨移植将在未来得到更多的应用,特别是在年轻患者中。新的标准化概念是当前前瞻性研究的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信