Alternative forms of deposit insurance and the quest for European harmonized deposit guarantee scheme-centred special administrative regimes to handle troubled banks
{"title":"Alternative forms of deposit insurance and the quest for European harmonized deposit guarantee scheme-centred special administrative regimes to handle troubled banks","authors":"Marco Bodellini","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unaa012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Since normal corporate insolvency proceedings run by law courts and purely aimed at liquidating troubled entities are generally considered inappropriate for peculiar institutions like banks, having a special administrative regime, which provides the authorities with resolution-like tools, is of paramount importance to maintaining the stability of the system and reducing the destruction of value. Still, in order for these special administrative regimes to properly work and, thereby, for the winding up to be orderly, as provided by the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, an active and leading role should be played by deposit guarantee schemes. Accordingly, this article advocates the adoption of special administrative regimes dedicated to troubled banks, harmonized at the European Union level and based on the interventionist role of deposit guarantee schemes, which I define as harmonized deposit guarantee scheme-centred special administrative regimes. But, from this perspective, a review of the European Union legislation, with regard to State aid provision and depositor preference, is needed to enable such schemes to properly perform their function through the so-called optional measures. And, in this regard, the article advances some reform proposals.","PeriodicalId":42756,"journal":{"name":"Uniform Law Review","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uniform Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unaa012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Since normal corporate insolvency proceedings run by law courts and purely aimed at liquidating troubled entities are generally considered inappropriate for peculiar institutions like banks, having a special administrative regime, which provides the authorities with resolution-like tools, is of paramount importance to maintaining the stability of the system and reducing the destruction of value. Still, in order for these special administrative regimes to properly work and, thereby, for the winding up to be orderly, as provided by the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, an active and leading role should be played by deposit guarantee schemes. Accordingly, this article advocates the adoption of special administrative regimes dedicated to troubled banks, harmonized at the European Union level and based on the interventionist role of deposit guarantee schemes, which I define as harmonized deposit guarantee scheme-centred special administrative regimes. But, from this perspective, a review of the European Union legislation, with regard to State aid provision and depositor preference, is needed to enable such schemes to properly perform their function through the so-called optional measures. And, in this regard, the article advances some reform proposals.
由于一般认为,由法院进行的纯粹以清算陷入困境的实体为目的的正常公司破产程序不适用于银行等特殊机构,因此,建立一个特别的行政制度,为当局提供类似于决议的工具,对于维持系统的稳定和减少价值的破坏至关重要。不过,为了使这些特别行政制度正常运作,从而使清算井然有序,就像《银行复苏与处置指令》(Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive)所规定的那样,存款担保计划应该发挥积极和主导作用。因此,本文主张采用专门针对陷入困境的银行的特别行政制度,在欧盟层面进行协调,并基于存款担保计划的干预作用,我将其定义为以存款担保计划为中心的协调特别行政制度。但是,从这个角度来看,需要审查欧洲联盟关于国家援助提供和存款人优先的立法,以使这些计划能够通过所谓的任择措施适当履行其职能。并在此基础上提出了改革建议。