Glycemic Control Reduces Infections in Post–Liver Transplant Patients: Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study

A. Wallia, K. Schmidt, Diana Johnson Oakes, Teresa Pollack, N. Welsh, S. Kling-Colson, Suruchi Gupta, Candice Fulkerson, G. Aleppo, N. Parikh, J. Levitsky, JP Norvell, A. Rademaker, M. Molitch
{"title":"Glycemic Control Reduces Infections in Post–Liver Transplant Patients: Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study","authors":"A. Wallia, K. Schmidt, Diana Johnson Oakes, Teresa Pollack, N. Welsh, S. Kling-Colson, Suruchi Gupta, Candice Fulkerson, G. Aleppo, N. Parikh, J. Levitsky, JP Norvell, A. Rademaker, M. Molitch","doi":"10.1210/jc.2016-3279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Previous studies have shown a relationship between glycemic control and posttransplant morbidity. Objective: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial in postliver transplant patients to evaluate intensive inpatient glycemic control and effects on outcomes to 1 year. Research Design and Intervention: A total of 164 patients [blood glucose (BG) >180 mg/dL] were randomized into 2 target groups: 82 with a BG of 140 mg/dL and 82 with a BG of 180 mg/dL. Continuous insulin infusions were initiated and then converted to subcutaneous basal bolus insulin therapy by our glucose management service. Results: The inpatient mean BG level was significantly different (140 group, 151.4 ± 19.5 mg/dL vs 180 group, 172.6 ± 27.9 mg/dL; P < 0.001). Any infection within 1 year occurred in 35 of the 82 patients (42.7%) in the 140 group and 54 of 82 (65.9%) in the 180 group (P = 0.0046). In a time-to-first infection analysis, being in the 140 group resulted in a hazard ratio of 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 0.83; P = 0.004); the difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant at 1 month (P = 0.008). The number with adjudicated transplant rejection was similar between the 2 groups [17 of 82 (20.7%) and 20 of 82 (24.3%) in the 140 and 180 groups, respectively; P = not significant]. Severe hypoglycemia (BG ⩽40 mg/dL) occurred in 3 patients (2 in the 140 group and 1 in the 180 group). However, more patients had moderate hypoglycemia (BG, 41 to 70 mg/dL) in the 140 group [27 of 82 (32.9%) vs 10 of 82 (12.2%) in the 180 group; P = 0.003]. Insulin-related hypoglycemia was not associated with the incidence of severe adverse outcomes. Conclusions: Glycemic control of 140 mg/dL safely resulted in a reduced incidence of infection after transplantation compared with 180 mg/dL, but with an increase in moderate hypoglycemia.","PeriodicalId":22632,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":"39 1","pages":"451–459"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-3279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Context: Previous studies have shown a relationship between glycemic control and posttransplant morbidity. Objective: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial in postliver transplant patients to evaluate intensive inpatient glycemic control and effects on outcomes to 1 year. Research Design and Intervention: A total of 164 patients [blood glucose (BG) >180 mg/dL] were randomized into 2 target groups: 82 with a BG of 140 mg/dL and 82 with a BG of 180 mg/dL. Continuous insulin infusions were initiated and then converted to subcutaneous basal bolus insulin therapy by our glucose management service. Results: The inpatient mean BG level was significantly different (140 group, 151.4 ± 19.5 mg/dL vs 180 group, 172.6 ± 27.9 mg/dL; P < 0.001). Any infection within 1 year occurred in 35 of the 82 patients (42.7%) in the 140 group and 54 of 82 (65.9%) in the 180 group (P = 0.0046). In a time-to-first infection analysis, being in the 140 group resulted in a hazard ratio of 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 0.83; P = 0.004); the difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant at 1 month (P = 0.008). The number with adjudicated transplant rejection was similar between the 2 groups [17 of 82 (20.7%) and 20 of 82 (24.3%) in the 140 and 180 groups, respectively; P = not significant]. Severe hypoglycemia (BG ⩽40 mg/dL) occurred in 3 patients (2 in the 140 group and 1 in the 180 group). However, more patients had moderate hypoglycemia (BG, 41 to 70 mg/dL) in the 140 group [27 of 82 (32.9%) vs 10 of 82 (12.2%) in the 180 group; P = 0.003]. Insulin-related hypoglycemia was not associated with the incidence of severe adverse outcomes. Conclusions: Glycemic control of 140 mg/dL safely resulted in a reduced incidence of infection after transplantation compared with 180 mg/dL, but with an increase in moderate hypoglycemia.
血糖控制可减少肝移植后患者感染:一项前瞻性随机研究的结果
背景:先前的研究已经显示血糖控制与移植后发病率之间的关系。目的:我们对肝移植后患者进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,以评估强化住院血糖控制及其对1年预后的影响。研究设计与干预:164例[血糖>180 mg/dL]患者随机分为2个目标组:血糖为140 mg/dL的患者82例和血糖为180 mg/dL的患者82例。我们的血糖管理服务开始持续胰岛素输注,然后转化为皮下基础胰岛素治疗。结果:住院患者平均BG水平差异有统计学意义(140组,151.4±19.5 mg/dL vs 180组,172.6±27.9 mg/dL;P < 0.001)。140组82例患者中有35例(42.7%)出现1年内感染,180组82例患者中有54例(65.9%)出现1年内感染(P = 0.0046)。在首次感染时间分析中,140组的风险比为0.54(95%可信区间为0.35 ~ 0.83;P = 0.004);1个月时两组比较差异有统计学意义(P = 0.008)。两组发生排斥反应的人数相似,140组为17 / 82(20.7%),180组为20 / 82 (24.3%);P =不显著]。3例患者出现严重低血糖(BG≥40 mg/dL)(140组2例,180组1例)。然而,140组中有更多的患者出现中度低血糖(BG, 41 - 70 mg/dL)[82人中有27人(32.9%)vs 180组中有10人(12.2%);P = 0.003]。胰岛素相关性低血糖与严重不良结局的发生率无关。结论:与180 mg/dL相比,140 mg/dL的安全血糖控制可降低移植后感染的发生率,但会增加中度低血糖的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信