Quantification of the Priming Effect of Canola (Brassica napus cv. Zafar) Response to Temperature Using Nonlinear Regression Models

S. Nikoumaram, N. Bayatian, O. Ansari
{"title":"Quantification of the Priming Effect of Canola (Brassica napus cv. Zafar) Response to Temperature Using Nonlinear Regression Models","authors":"S. Nikoumaram, N. Bayatian, O. Ansari","doi":"10.29252/YUJS.6.2.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Temperature is one of the primary environmental regulators of seed germination. Seed priming technique has been known as a challenge to improving germination and seedling emergence under different environmental stresses. Quantification of germination response to temperature and priming is possible, using non-liner regression models. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of temperature and priming on germination and determination of cardinal temperatures (base, optimum and maximum) of Brassica napus L. Material and Methods: Treatments included priming levels (non-priming, priming with water, gibberellin 50 and 100 mg/l) and temperature (5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 35 and 40 °C). Germination percentage and time to 50% maximum seed germination of Brassica napus L. were calculated for different temperatures and priming by fitting 3-parameter logistic functions to cumulative germination data. For the purpose of quantifying the response of germination rate to temperature, use was made of 3 nonlinear regression models (segmented, dent-like and beta). The root mean square of errors (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R 2 ), CV and SE for the relationship between the observed and the predicted germination percentage were used to compare the models and select the superior model from among the methods employed. Results: The results indicated that temperature and priming were effective in both germination percentage and germination rate. In addition, the results showed that germination percentage and rate increase with increasing temperature to the optimum level and using priming. As for the comparison of the 3 models, according to the root mean square of errors (RMSE) of germination time, the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), CV and SE, the best model for the determination of cardinal temperatures of Brassica napus L. for non-primed seeds was the segmented model. For hydro-priming and hormone-priming with 50 mg/l GA, the best models were segmented and dent-like models and for hormone-priming with 100 mg/l GA, the dent-like model was the best. The results showed that for non-priming, hydropriming with water, gibberellin 50 and 100 mg/l treatments, the segmented model estimated base temperature as 3.54, 2.57, 2.34 and 2.34 °C and dent-model estimated base temperature as 3.34, 2.45, 2.21 and 2.83 °C, respectively. The segmented model estimated optimum temperature as 24.62, 23.23, 23.69 and 24.38 °C. The dent-model estimated lower limit of optimum temperature and upper limit of optimum temperature as 20.01, 19.62, 16.25, 19.87 and 28.81, 27.38, 29.58 and 27.31 °C. Conclusion: Utilizing non-liner models (segmented, dent-like and beta) for quantification of germination of Brassica napus L. response to different temperatures and priming produced desirable results. Therefore, utilizing the output of these models at different temperatures can be useful in the prediction of germination rate in different treatments.","PeriodicalId":14578,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Seed Research","volume":"110 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Seed Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/YUJS.6.2.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Temperature is one of the primary environmental regulators of seed germination. Seed priming technique has been known as a challenge to improving germination and seedling emergence under different environmental stresses. Quantification of germination response to temperature and priming is possible, using non-liner regression models. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of temperature and priming on germination and determination of cardinal temperatures (base, optimum and maximum) of Brassica napus L. Material and Methods: Treatments included priming levels (non-priming, priming with water, gibberellin 50 and 100 mg/l) and temperature (5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 35 and 40 °C). Germination percentage and time to 50% maximum seed germination of Brassica napus L. were calculated for different temperatures and priming by fitting 3-parameter logistic functions to cumulative germination data. For the purpose of quantifying the response of germination rate to temperature, use was made of 3 nonlinear regression models (segmented, dent-like and beta). The root mean square of errors (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R 2 ), CV and SE for the relationship between the observed and the predicted germination percentage were used to compare the models and select the superior model from among the methods employed. Results: The results indicated that temperature and priming were effective in both germination percentage and germination rate. In addition, the results showed that germination percentage and rate increase with increasing temperature to the optimum level and using priming. As for the comparison of the 3 models, according to the root mean square of errors (RMSE) of germination time, the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), CV and SE, the best model for the determination of cardinal temperatures of Brassica napus L. for non-primed seeds was the segmented model. For hydro-priming and hormone-priming with 50 mg/l GA, the best models were segmented and dent-like models and for hormone-priming with 100 mg/l GA, the dent-like model was the best. The results showed that for non-priming, hydropriming with water, gibberellin 50 and 100 mg/l treatments, the segmented model estimated base temperature as 3.54, 2.57, 2.34 and 2.34 °C and dent-model estimated base temperature as 3.34, 2.45, 2.21 and 2.83 °C, respectively. The segmented model estimated optimum temperature as 24.62, 23.23, 23.69 and 24.38 °C. The dent-model estimated lower limit of optimum temperature and upper limit of optimum temperature as 20.01, 19.62, 16.25, 19.87 and 28.81, 27.38, 29.58 and 27.31 °C. Conclusion: Utilizing non-liner models (segmented, dent-like and beta) for quantification of germination of Brassica napus L. response to different temperatures and priming produced desirable results. Therefore, utilizing the output of these models at different temperatures can be useful in the prediction of germination rate in different treatments.
甘蓝型油菜启动效应的定量分析。基于非线性回归模型的温度响应
温度是影响种子萌发的主要环境因子之一。引种技术是在不同环境胁迫下提高种子萌发和出苗能力的一项挑战。使用非线性回归模型,可以量化发芽对温度和启动的响应。因此,本研究的目的是评估温度和启动对甘蓝型油菜萌发的影响,并确定基本温度(基础、最佳和最高温度)。材料和方法:处理包括启动水平(非启动、水启动、赤霉素50和100 mg/l)和温度(5、10、15、20、30、35和40°C)。通过对累积发芽数据拟合3参数logistic函数,计算了不同温度和启动条件下甘蓝型油菜种子的发芽率和达到50%最大发芽率所需时间。为了量化发芽率对温度的响应,我们使用了3种非线性回归模型(分段、凹痕和beta)。利用实测发芽率与预测发芽率关系的误差均方根(RMSE)、决定系数(r2)、CV和SE对模型进行比较,并从所采用的方法中选择最优模型。结果:温度和启动对发芽率和发芽率均有影响。结果表明,随着温度的升高和发芽率的提高,发芽率和发芽率均达到最佳水平。在3种模型的比较中,从萌发时间、决定系数r2、CV和SE的误差均方根(RMSE)来看,分段模型是确定甘蓝型油菜种子基本温度的最佳模型。对于50 mg/l GA的水激发和激素激发,最好的模型是分段和凹痕状模型,而对于100 mg/l GA的激素激发,最好的模型是凹痕状模型。结果表明,在不灌水、加水灌水、赤霉素50和100 mg/l处理下,分段模型估计的碱基温度分别为3.54、2.57、2.34和2.34℃,凹痕模型估计的碱基温度分别为3.34、2.45、2.21和2.83℃。分段模型估计最适温度分别为24.62、23.23、23.69和24.38℃。凹痕模型估计的最适温度下限和上限分别为20.01、19.62、16.25、19.87和28.81、27.38、29.58和27.31℃。结论:利用非线性模型(分段模型、凹痕模型和beta模型)定量分析甘蓝型油菜萌发对不同温度和不同基质的响应,效果较好。因此,利用这些模型在不同温度下的输出可用于预测不同处理下的发芽率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信