Evaluation of Customized Peripheral Sealing Device Acceptance for Surgical/Medical Masks Among Dental Professionals during Early COVID-19 Pandemic

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
G. Roque-Torres, Jessica Kim, E. Costa, U. Oyoyo
{"title":"Evaluation of Customized Peripheral Sealing Device Acceptance for Surgical/Medical Masks Among Dental Professionals during Early COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"G. Roque-Torres, Jessica Kim, E. Costa, U. Oyoyo","doi":"10.15517/ijds.2022.50444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A 3-dimensional (3D) printed custom-frame can improve the peripheral seal of readily available surgical/medical masks. This study aimed to assess the acceptance of a 3D-printed custom-frame with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) surgical/medical masks and the use of a face shield. A total of 206 subjects from a dental school participated, who answered a multiple-choice questionnaire. Participants received an invitation through the institutional email of the school via Qualtrics platform. 3D printed custom-frames were fabricated for each participant. According to their response, participants were divided into 4 groups: mask only (M), mask and frame (MF), mask and face shield (MFS), and all 3 personal protective equipment (MFFS). Data was analyzed in absolute and relative frequency. The acceptance of a 3D-printed custom-frame in the group MFFS varied between “poor”/’’very poor” (44.7%). It allowed “good” performance of routine procedures (40.3%), but “poor” visual quality (48.1%). Musculoskeletal tolerance and ease to perform movements were adequate. There was no interference in olfactory sensitivity (44.7%) or in the ability to breathe (34.5%). Finally, it showed \"moderate pain\" (48.1%) on the ear and \"no pain\" (38.9%) on the head. The 3D-printed custom-frame adapted to ASTM surgical/medical face masks showed reasonable tolerance.  Side effects of ear pain ranging in degrees were noted. Further research is indicated to evaluate safety, comfort, compliance, side effects, and occupational hazards of long-term use of enhanced PPE recommendations.Avoiding the recurrent outbreaks of COVID-19, the use of PPE by the public is necessary. Improper PPE use is a major source of concern for human and environmental health. Preventing such activities can be done by following steps involved in PPE disposals or by getting a new way to re-use such as improving peripherical sealing. Our work highlights that a custom-frame can improve protection, without adverse effects.","PeriodicalId":19450,"journal":{"name":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2022.50444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A 3-dimensional (3D) printed custom-frame can improve the peripheral seal of readily available surgical/medical masks. This study aimed to assess the acceptance of a 3D-printed custom-frame with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) surgical/medical masks and the use of a face shield. A total of 206 subjects from a dental school participated, who answered a multiple-choice questionnaire. Participants received an invitation through the institutional email of the school via Qualtrics platform. 3D printed custom-frames were fabricated for each participant. According to their response, participants were divided into 4 groups: mask only (M), mask and frame (MF), mask and face shield (MFS), and all 3 personal protective equipment (MFFS). Data was analyzed in absolute and relative frequency. The acceptance of a 3D-printed custom-frame in the group MFFS varied between “poor”/’’very poor” (44.7%). It allowed “good” performance of routine procedures (40.3%), but “poor” visual quality (48.1%). Musculoskeletal tolerance and ease to perform movements were adequate. There was no interference in olfactory sensitivity (44.7%) or in the ability to breathe (34.5%). Finally, it showed "moderate pain" (48.1%) on the ear and "no pain" (38.9%) on the head. The 3D-printed custom-frame adapted to ASTM surgical/medical face masks showed reasonable tolerance.  Side effects of ear pain ranging in degrees were noted. Further research is indicated to evaluate safety, comfort, compliance, side effects, and occupational hazards of long-term use of enhanced PPE recommendations.Avoiding the recurrent outbreaks of COVID-19, the use of PPE by the public is necessary. Improper PPE use is a major source of concern for human and environmental health. Preventing such activities can be done by following steps involved in PPE disposals or by getting a new way to re-use such as improving peripherical sealing. Our work highlights that a custom-frame can improve protection, without adverse effects.
COVID-19大流行早期牙科专业人员对外科/医用口罩定制外围密封装置接受度的评估
三维(3D)打印定制框架可以改善现成的外科/医用口罩的外围密封。本研究旨在评估美国材料测试协会(ASTM)对3d打印定制框架的接受程度,以及手术/医用口罩和面罩的使用。来自一所牙科学校的206名受试者参与了这项研究,他们回答了一份选择题问卷。参与者通过Qualtrics平台通过学校的机构邮件收到邀请。为每位参与者制作了3D打印定制框架。根据参与者的反应,将他们分为4组:只戴口罩(M)、口罩加框架(MF)、口罩加面罩(MFS)和全部3种个人防护装备(MFFS)。数据以绝对频率和相对频率进行分析。在MFFS组中,3d打印定制框架的接受度在“差”和“非常差”(44.7%)之间变化。它允许“良好”的常规程序性能(40.3%),但“差”的视觉质量(48.1%)。肌肉骨骼的耐受性和易于进行运动是足够的。嗅觉灵敏度(44.7%)和呼吸能力(34.5%)均未受干扰。最后,耳朵“中度疼痛”(48.1%),头部“无痛”(38.9%)。适应ASTM外科/医用口罩的3d打印定制框架显示出合理的公差。注意到不同程度耳痛的副作用。建议进一步研究以评估长期使用增强型PPE建议的安全性、舒适性、依从性、副作用和职业危害。为避免COVID-19再次暴发,公众有必要使用个人防护装备。个人防护装备使用不当是人类和环境健康的一个主要关切来源。预防此类活动可通过以下步骤进行:个人防护用品处置或采用新的重复使用方法,如改善外围密封。我们的工作强调,定制框架可以提高保护,没有不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信