Item Recommendation by Combining Relative and Absolute Feedback Data

Saikishore Kalloori, Tianyu Li, F. Ricci
{"title":"Item Recommendation by Combining Relative and Absolute Feedback Data","authors":"Saikishore Kalloori, Tianyu Li, F. Ricci","doi":"10.1145/3331184.3331295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"User preferences in the form of absolute feedback, s.a., ratings, are widely exploited in Recommender Systems (RSs). Recent research has explored the usage of preferences expressed with pairwise comparisons, which signal relative feedback. It has been shown that pairwise comparisons can be effectively combined with ratings, but, it is important to fine tune the technique that leverages both types of feedback. Previous approaches train a single model by converting ratings into pairwise comparisons, and then use only that type of data. However, we claim that these two types of preferences reveal different information about users interests and should be exploited differently. Hence, in this work, we develop a ranking technique that separately exploits absolute and relative preferences in a hybrid model. In particular, we propose a joint loss function which is computed on both absolute and relative preferences of users. Our proposed ranking model uses pairwise comparisons data to predict the user's preference order between pairs of items and uses ratings to push high rated (relevant) items to the top of the ranking. Experimental results on three different data sets demonstrate that the proposed technique outperforms competitive baseline algorithms on popular ranking-oriented evaluation metrics.","PeriodicalId":20700,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3331184.3331295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

User preferences in the form of absolute feedback, s.a., ratings, are widely exploited in Recommender Systems (RSs). Recent research has explored the usage of preferences expressed with pairwise comparisons, which signal relative feedback. It has been shown that pairwise comparisons can be effectively combined with ratings, but, it is important to fine tune the technique that leverages both types of feedback. Previous approaches train a single model by converting ratings into pairwise comparisons, and then use only that type of data. However, we claim that these two types of preferences reveal different information about users interests and should be exploited differently. Hence, in this work, we develop a ranking technique that separately exploits absolute and relative preferences in a hybrid model. In particular, we propose a joint loss function which is computed on both absolute and relative preferences of users. Our proposed ranking model uses pairwise comparisons data to predict the user's preference order between pairs of items and uses ratings to push high rated (relevant) items to the top of the ranking. Experimental results on three different data sets demonstrate that the proposed technique outperforms competitive baseline algorithms on popular ranking-oriented evaluation metrics.
结合相对和绝对反馈数据进行项目推荐
绝对反馈形式的用户偏好,如评分,在推荐系统(RSs)中被广泛利用。最近的研究探索了用两两比较来表达偏好的用法,两两比较表示相对反馈。研究表明,两两比较可以有效地与评级相结合,但重要的是要微调利用这两种反馈的技术。以前的方法通过将评级转换为两两比较来训练单个模型,然后只使用该类型的数据。然而,我们认为这两种类型的偏好揭示了用户兴趣的不同信息,应该以不同的方式加以利用。因此,在这项工作中,我们开发了一种排序技术,在混合模型中分别利用绝对偏好和相对偏好。特别地,我们提出了一个联合损失函数,它是根据用户的绝对偏好和相对偏好计算的。我们提出的排名模型使用两两比较数据来预测用户在成对物品之间的偏好顺序,并使用评级将高评级(相关)物品推到排名的顶部。在三个不同数据集上的实验结果表明,该方法在基于排名的评价指标上优于竞争对手的基线算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信