{"title":"Korean imperatives at two different speech levels","authors":"M. Kim","doi":"10.1075/prag.20060.kim","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Korean imperatives are differentiated by speech levels or levels of honorification. Accordingly, most research on\n Korean imperatives examines them from the perspective of politeness and interpersonal relations. This study takes a different\n approach, focusing on two types of non-honorific imperative turn design: one with the intimate speech level imperative\n e/a and the other with the plain speech level imperative ela/ala. Close examination of the\n forms in naturally occurring conversation provides a clearer picture of when and how the use of these imperatives is warranted by\n specific interactional configurations and contexts in everyday Korean talk-in-interaction. This study shows that alternate\n imperatives do not simply index politeness or social status, but are important resources for implementing separate action formats\n that pursue divergent interactional trajectories.","PeriodicalId":46975,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20060.kim","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Korean imperatives are differentiated by speech levels or levels of honorification. Accordingly, most research on
Korean imperatives examines them from the perspective of politeness and interpersonal relations. This study takes a different
approach, focusing on two types of non-honorific imperative turn design: one with the intimate speech level imperative
e/a and the other with the plain speech level imperative ela/ala. Close examination of the
forms in naturally occurring conversation provides a clearer picture of when and how the use of these imperatives is warranted by
specific interactional configurations and contexts in everyday Korean talk-in-interaction. This study shows that alternate
imperatives do not simply index politeness or social status, but are important resources for implementing separate action formats
that pursue divergent interactional trajectories.