Comparison of the Theory of Mind and False Beliefs in Patients with Major Depression Disorder, Bipolar Disorder I, II and Healthy Individuals

Q4 Social Sciences
L. Pirayeh, S. Behzadipour, M. Naghshvarian, H. R. Mahmoudiyan
{"title":"Comparison of the Theory of Mind and False Beliefs in Patients with Major Depression Disorder, Bipolar Disorder I, II and Healthy Individuals","authors":"L. Pirayeh, S. Behzadipour, M. Naghshvarian, H. R. Mahmoudiyan","doi":"10.29252/HEHP.6.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionThe aim of this study is to compare the theory of mind and false beliefs in patient with major depression disorder, bipolar disorder I, bipolar disorder II and healthy individuals.MethodsThe sample is 90 patients that has been bedridden in Ostad Moharari Hospital and it includes 30 patients with major depression disorder, 30 patient with bipolar disorder I, 30 patients with bipolar disorder II, and 30 healthy individuals have been selected as a control group matching with the experimental group of the same sex, marital status, age, level of education and social status. In this study, \"Reading the Mind in the Eyes\" has been used and the data have been analyzed using MANOVA.ResultsThe results of analysis of variance show that there are significant differences in theory of mind and false beliefs between the groups studied and also there is a significant difference between the patient groups and the control group, but no significant difference has been found between the patient groups.ConclusionThe defect of theory of mind and false beliefs can be considered as a social cognition deviation. Therefore, theory of mind and false beliefs training can be used as a treatment for this group.","PeriodicalId":36058,"journal":{"name":"Health Education and Health Promotion","volume":"129 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/HEHP.6.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionThe aim of this study is to compare the theory of mind and false beliefs in patient with major depression disorder, bipolar disorder I, bipolar disorder II and healthy individuals.MethodsThe sample is 90 patients that has been bedridden in Ostad Moharari Hospital and it includes 30 patients with major depression disorder, 30 patient with bipolar disorder I, 30 patients with bipolar disorder II, and 30 healthy individuals have been selected as a control group matching with the experimental group of the same sex, marital status, age, level of education and social status. In this study, "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" has been used and the data have been analyzed using MANOVA.ResultsThe results of analysis of variance show that there are significant differences in theory of mind and false beliefs between the groups studied and also there is a significant difference between the patient groups and the control group, but no significant difference has been found between the patient groups.ConclusionThe defect of theory of mind and false beliefs can be considered as a social cognition deviation. Therefore, theory of mind and false beliefs training can be used as a treatment for this group.
重度抑郁症患者、双相情感障碍I型、II型与健康个体心理理论与错误信念的比较
本研究的目的是比较重度抑郁症患者、双相情感障碍I型、双相情感障碍II型和健康个体的心理理论和错误信念。方法以Ostad Moharari医院住院的90例患者为样本,其中重度抑郁症患者30例,双相情感障碍I型患者30例,双相情感障碍II型患者30例,健康个体30例,与性别、婚姻状况、年龄、文化程度、社会地位相同的实验组相匹配作为对照组。在本研究中,我们使用了“Reading the Mind In the Eyes”,并使用方差分析(MANOVA)对数据进行分析。结果方差分析结果显示,两组患者在心理理论和错误信念方面存在显著差异,两组患者与对照组之间存在显著差异,但两组患者之间无显著差异。结论心理理论缺陷和错误信念可视为一种社会认知偏差。因此,心理理论和错误信念训练可以作为治疗这一群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Education and Health Promotion
Health Education and Health Promotion Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信