Local policies on biosimilars: are they designed to optimize use of liberated resources?

IF 0.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
A. Bertolani, C. Jommi
{"title":"Local policies on biosimilars: are they designed to optimize use of liberated resources?","authors":"A. Bertolani, C. Jommi","doi":"10.5639/GABIJ.2020.0904.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study Objectives: Different policies have been implemented to enhance uptake of biosimilars. Regarding policies focussing on the demand-side, the literature has mainly concentrated on interchangeability and substitutability recommendations, issued by national or regional policymakers. Information on actions taken by healthcare organisations (HCOs) regarding prescribing behaviour is limited. Furthermore, there is no evidence on whether local authorities implemented a policy framework aimed to appropriately reallocate resources gained through patent expiration. This paper aims to fill these gaps, investigating policies on biosimilars implemented at the local level in the Italian National Health Service. Materials and Methods: Data were retrieved through a structured, validated questionnaire, administered online to all 199 public HCOs. Results: Seventy-six organizations in 16 of 21 Italian regions completed the survey, 89% of HCOs implemented information/educational initiatives on biosimilars. Prescription targets on biosimilars versus originators and off-patent versus in-patent molecules were introduced in 62% and 75% of HCOs, respectively. Prescribers reaching targets are mostly rewarded through monetary incentives. 75% of HCOs performed systematic impact evaluation of biosimilars. However, only 21% of HCOs detect patient under-treatment due to budget constraints and how availability of cheaper drugs could help. Furthermore, according to 25% of respondents, their HCO is involved in studies on biosimilars, but respondents did not provide any evidence of these studies. Discussion and conclusions: The study shows a high level of proactivity by Italian HCOs regarding actions on prescribing behaviour for off-patent biologicals. However, it seems that structured actions aimed at appropriately reallocating resources gained through patent expiration are still lacking.","PeriodicalId":43994,"journal":{"name":"GaBI Journal-Generics and Biosimilars Initiative Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GaBI Journal-Generics and Biosimilars Initiative Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5639/GABIJ.2020.0904.027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Study Objectives: Different policies have been implemented to enhance uptake of biosimilars. Regarding policies focussing on the demand-side, the literature has mainly concentrated on interchangeability and substitutability recommendations, issued by national or regional policymakers. Information on actions taken by healthcare organisations (HCOs) regarding prescribing behaviour is limited. Furthermore, there is no evidence on whether local authorities implemented a policy framework aimed to appropriately reallocate resources gained through patent expiration. This paper aims to fill these gaps, investigating policies on biosimilars implemented at the local level in the Italian National Health Service. Materials and Methods: Data were retrieved through a structured, validated questionnaire, administered online to all 199 public HCOs. Results: Seventy-six organizations in 16 of 21 Italian regions completed the survey, 89% of HCOs implemented information/educational initiatives on biosimilars. Prescription targets on biosimilars versus originators and off-patent versus in-patent molecules were introduced in 62% and 75% of HCOs, respectively. Prescribers reaching targets are mostly rewarded through monetary incentives. 75% of HCOs performed systematic impact evaluation of biosimilars. However, only 21% of HCOs detect patient under-treatment due to budget constraints and how availability of cheaper drugs could help. Furthermore, according to 25% of respondents, their HCO is involved in studies on biosimilars, but respondents did not provide any evidence of these studies. Discussion and conclusions: The study shows a high level of proactivity by Italian HCOs regarding actions on prescribing behaviour for off-patent biologicals. However, it seems that structured actions aimed at appropriately reallocating resources gained through patent expiration are still lacking.
生物仿制药的地方政策:是否旨在优化释放资源的利用?
研究目的:已经实施了不同的政策来提高生物仿制药的吸收。关于侧重于需求侧的政策,文献主要集中于国家或地区政策制定者发布的互换性和可替代性建议。关于医疗保健组织(HCOs)针对处方行为采取的行动的信息有限。此外,没有证据表明地方当局是否实施了旨在适当重新分配通过专利到期获得的资源的政策框架。本文旨在填补这些空白,调查在意大利国家卫生服务的地方一级实施的生物仿制药政策。材料和方法:通过结构化的、有效的问卷收集数据,对所有199家公立hco进行在线管理。结果:意大利21个地区中的16个地区的76个组织完成了调查,89%的hco实施了生物仿制药的信息/教育举措。分别在62%和75%的hco中引入了生物仿制药与原研药、非专利分子与专利内分子的处方靶点。达到目标的处方者大多通过金钱激励来奖励。75%的hco对生物仿制药进行了系统的影响评估。然而,由于预算限制和如何获得更便宜的药物可以提供帮助,只有21%的hco发现患者治疗不足。此外,根据25%的受访者,他们的HCO参与了生物仿制药的研究,但受访者没有提供这些研究的任何证据。讨论和结论:该研究表明意大利hco对非专利生物制剂处方行为的行动具有高度的主动性。然而,似乎仍然缺乏旨在适当重新分配通过专利到期获得的资源的结构化行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The scope of GaBI Journal is broad and of interest and relevance to professionals active in clinical practice, pharmaceutical science and policy. Materials published in GaBI Journal include high quality research reports, literature reviews and case studies, all of which are peer reviewed. Manuscripts on all aspects of generic and biosimilar medicines, covering areas in clinical, fundamental, technical, manufacturing, bi-processing, economic and social aspects of pharmaceuticals and therapeutics are welcome. In addition, high quality work submitted in other formats, for example, scientific and evidence-based commentaries, may also be considered. In all cases, the emphasis is on quality, originality and knowledge contribution to those involved in health care. All manuscripts submitted to GaBI Journal are subject to a rigorous peer review process. GaBI Journal plans to be indexed in PubMed within two years, and that indexing will be retrospective. GaBI Journal is published quarterly from 2012. All articles are published in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信