A Theory for Cultural Resistance: The Cases of L. M. Silko’s Ceremony and L. Erdrich’s Tracks

IF 0.1 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
Sajjad Gheytasi, Mohsen Hanif
{"title":"A Theory for Cultural Resistance: The Cases of L. M. Silko’s Ceremony and L. Erdrich’s Tracks","authors":"Sajjad Gheytasi, Mohsen Hanif","doi":"10.5325/intelitestud.25.3.0378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:One critical issue facing subaltern cultures is how they react to the process of cultural assimilation. This article aims to analyze the characters in Leslie Marmon Silko’s Ceremony and Louise Erdrich’s Tracks, to see how they interpret and react to the “social norms.” The novels offer counter discourses that try to resist, negate, and put in suspense the nodal points of the dominant culture. When exposed to the hegemonic discourse, the subalterns also construct and re-territorialize the significance of the nodal points. The two novelists use elements from their own cultures in the form of memories, storytelling, songs, etc., to impose their own definitions on the floating signifiers. Contradictions caused by the process create fault lines that will destabilize the dominant discourse’s nodal points and reformulate the hegemonic discourse’s rules. The resisting characters in both novels remember the residual elements in which the dominant discourse is questioned and negated. Strategies of resistance in both novels relatively follow the same path: the residual elements create fault lines deconstructing the nodal points of ideological discourse. This process will make us aware of other possibilities of signification in the field of discursivity, opening up space and time for articulating new elements.","PeriodicalId":40903,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","volume":"36 1","pages":"378 - 402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.25.3.0378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:One critical issue facing subaltern cultures is how they react to the process of cultural assimilation. This article aims to analyze the characters in Leslie Marmon Silko’s Ceremony and Louise Erdrich’s Tracks, to see how they interpret and react to the “social norms.” The novels offer counter discourses that try to resist, negate, and put in suspense the nodal points of the dominant culture. When exposed to the hegemonic discourse, the subalterns also construct and re-territorialize the significance of the nodal points. The two novelists use elements from their own cultures in the form of memories, storytelling, songs, etc., to impose their own definitions on the floating signifiers. Contradictions caused by the process create fault lines that will destabilize the dominant discourse’s nodal points and reformulate the hegemonic discourse’s rules. The resisting characters in both novels remember the residual elements in which the dominant discourse is questioned and negated. Strategies of resistance in both novels relatively follow the same path: the residual elements create fault lines deconstructing the nodal points of ideological discourse. This process will make us aware of other possibilities of signification in the field of discursivity, opening up space and time for articulating new elements.
一种文化抵抗理论:西尔科的《仪式》与厄德里奇的《轨迹
下层文化面临的一个关键问题是他们如何对文化同化过程作出反应。本文旨在分析莱斯利·马蒙·西尔科的《仪式》和路易丝·厄德里奇的《足迹》中的人物,看他们是如何解读和回应“社会规范”的。这些小说提供了反话语,试图抵制、否定和悬疑主导文化的节点。当面对霸权话语时,庶民也在建构和重新属地化节点的意义。两位小说家利用各自文化中的元素,以记忆、故事、歌曲等形式,将自己的定义强加于漂浮的能指之上。由这一过程引起的矛盾产生了断层线,这将破坏主导话语的节点,并重新制定霸权话语的规则。两部小说中的反抗人物都记得主导话语被质疑和否定的残余因素。两部小说的反抗策略大致相同:残余元素制造断层线,解构意识形态话语的节点。这一过程将使我们意识到话语领域的其他意义可能性,为表达新元素开辟空间和时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Interdisciplinary Literary Studies seeks to explore the interconnections between literary study and other disciplines, ideologies, and cultural methods of critique. All national literatures, periods, and genres are welcomed topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信