{"title":"Protest, Memory and Selfhood","authors":"H. Glew","doi":"10.1080/09574042.2022.2129565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a well-crafted, important and much-needed addition to the scholarship on women, work and protest in the second half of the twentieth century. Focused around several case studies—the Ford machinists’ strikes in 1968 and 1985, the Trico-Folberth strike in 1976 and the occupation of Sexton’s in Fakenham in 1972—this book is a significant addition to the histories of trade unionism, feminism, women’s agency, class politics and activism. The book is built around oral history interviews with women who participated in the strikes, as well as research in trade union, newspaper and local archives. Moss is candid about the fact that he was unable to secure interviews with women from minoritised ethnic backgrounds and acknowledges that an intersectional analysis which fully investigates how ‘race’ affected the strikers’ experiences and treatment is therefore not possible. A significant number of the oral histories were conducted by the author in the early 2010s and these are supplemented by archived oral histories conducted by previous scholars. The effect of these layers of oral history is a rich and often nuanced account of how the participants’ own feelings about the strikes have changed, or not, over the course of recent years. This is particularly demonstrated to good effect in the two tranches of interviews with the Dagenham strikers of 1968, one set of which were conducted in 2006 and another by the author in 2013. The two sets of interviews fall before and after the release and public reaction to the film Made in Dagenham (2010). Moss is able to trace the ways in which the women’s own reactions to their experiences of the strike have mutated, or not, since the release of the film and the prominence it gave to the strike. Moss reflects, too, on how the lesser-known second Dagenham strike was in many ways the completion of the endeavour behind the first one—that is, it brought about the regrading of female machinists, who had been placed on a demonstrably too-low grade because their Jonathan Moss, Women, Workplace Protest and Political Identity in England, 1968-1985, Manchester University Press, 2019, pp. v-197, £18.94 paperback, ISBN 978-1-5261-6043-0","PeriodicalId":54053,"journal":{"name":"Women-A Cultural Review","volume":"52 1","pages":"449 - 451"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women-A Cultural Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09574042.2022.2129565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This is a well-crafted, important and much-needed addition to the scholarship on women, work and protest in the second half of the twentieth century. Focused around several case studies—the Ford machinists’ strikes in 1968 and 1985, the Trico-Folberth strike in 1976 and the occupation of Sexton’s in Fakenham in 1972—this book is a significant addition to the histories of trade unionism, feminism, women’s agency, class politics and activism. The book is built around oral history interviews with women who participated in the strikes, as well as research in trade union, newspaper and local archives. Moss is candid about the fact that he was unable to secure interviews with women from minoritised ethnic backgrounds and acknowledges that an intersectional analysis which fully investigates how ‘race’ affected the strikers’ experiences and treatment is therefore not possible. A significant number of the oral histories were conducted by the author in the early 2010s and these are supplemented by archived oral histories conducted by previous scholars. The effect of these layers of oral history is a rich and often nuanced account of how the participants’ own feelings about the strikes have changed, or not, over the course of recent years. This is particularly demonstrated to good effect in the two tranches of interviews with the Dagenham strikers of 1968, one set of which were conducted in 2006 and another by the author in 2013. The two sets of interviews fall before and after the release and public reaction to the film Made in Dagenham (2010). Moss is able to trace the ways in which the women’s own reactions to their experiences of the strike have mutated, or not, since the release of the film and the prominence it gave to the strike. Moss reflects, too, on how the lesser-known second Dagenham strike was in many ways the completion of the endeavour behind the first one—that is, it brought about the regrading of female machinists, who had been placed on a demonstrably too-low grade because their Jonathan Moss, Women, Workplace Protest and Political Identity in England, 1968-1985, Manchester University Press, 2019, pp. v-197, £18.94 paperback, ISBN 978-1-5261-6043-0
这本书是对20世纪下半叶妇女、工作和抗议学术研究的精雕细琢、重要和急需的补充。这本书集中于几个案例研究——1968年和1985年的福特机械师罢工,1976年的Trico-Folberth罢工和1972年法肯纳姆的塞克斯顿罢工——是对工会主义、女权主义、妇女代理、阶级政治和激进主义历史的重要补充。这本书的基础是对参加罢工的妇女的口述历史采访,以及对工会、报纸和当地档案的研究。Moss坦率地承认,他无法确保采访到少数族裔背景的女性,并承认,因此不可能进行全面调查“种族”如何影响罢工者的经历和治疗的交叉分析。大量的口述历史是作者在2010年代初进行的,并辅以以前学者进行的口述历史档案。这些层层叠叠的口述历史的影响,是对参与者自己对罢工的感受在近年来如何变化或不变的丰富而微妙的描述。这在对1968年达格纳姆罢工者的两部分采访中得到了特别好的证明,其中一组是在2006年进行的,另一组是作者在2013年进行的。这两组采访分别发生在电影《达格纳姆制造》(Made in Dagenham, 2010)上映和公众反应之前和之后。莫斯能够追踪到,自电影上映以来,这些女性自己对罢工经历的反应发生了变化,或者没有发生变化。莫斯还反思了鲜为人知的第二次达格南罢工在许多方面是如何完成第一次罢工背后的努力的,也就是,它带来了女性机械师的重新定位,因为她们的乔纳森·莫斯,英国的女性,工作场所抗议和政治认同,1968-1985,曼彻斯特大学出版社,2019年,第v-197页,18.94英镑平装本,ISBN 978-1-5261-6043-0,她们被放在一个明显过低的等级