Daniele Ruggiu, V. Blok, Christopher Coenen, Christos Kalloniatis, Angeliki Kitsiou, Aikaterini-Georgia Mavroeidi, Simone Milani, Andrea Sitzia
{"title":"Responsible innovation at work: gamification, public engagement, and privacy by design","authors":"Daniele Ruggiu, V. Blok, Christopher Coenen, Christos Kalloniatis, Angeliki Kitsiou, Aikaterini-Georgia Mavroeidi, Simone Milani, Andrea Sitzia","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2022.2076985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public engagement is crucial to strengthen responsibility frameworks in highly innovative contexts, including as part of business organisations. One particular innovation that calls for public engagement is gami fi cation. Gami fi cation fosters changes in working practices to improve the organisation, e ffi ciency and productivity of a business by introducing grati fi cation and engagement mechanisms in non-gaming contexts. Gami fi cation modi fi es the workforce ’ s perception of constraints and stimulates the voluntary assumption of best practices to the bene fi t of employees and enterprises alike. Here, we broadly discuss the use of gami fi cation at work. Indeed, gami fi cation raises several concerns about privacy, due to the massive collection, storage and processing of data, and about the freedom of employees: as the level of data protection decreases, so too does workers ’ self-determination. We argue that the implementation of privacy by design can not only strengthen autonomy via data protection but also develop more viable instances of RRI in accordance with human rights.","PeriodicalId":46727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2076985","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Public engagement is crucial to strengthen responsibility frameworks in highly innovative contexts, including as part of business organisations. One particular innovation that calls for public engagement is gami fi cation. Gami fi cation fosters changes in working practices to improve the organisation, e ffi ciency and productivity of a business by introducing grati fi cation and engagement mechanisms in non-gaming contexts. Gami fi cation modi fi es the workforce ’ s perception of constraints and stimulates the voluntary assumption of best practices to the bene fi t of employees and enterprises alike. Here, we broadly discuss the use of gami fi cation at work. Indeed, gami fi cation raises several concerns about privacy, due to the massive collection, storage and processing of data, and about the freedom of employees: as the level of data protection decreases, so too does workers ’ self-determination. We argue that the implementation of privacy by design can not only strengthen autonomy via data protection but also develop more viable instances of RRI in accordance with human rights.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Responsible Innovation (JRI) provides a forum for discussions of the normative assessment and governance of knowledge-based innovation. JRI offers humanists, social scientists, policy analysts and legal scholars, and natural scientists and engineers an opportunity to articulate, strengthen, and critique the relations among approaches to responsible innovation, thus giving further shape to a newly emerging community of research and practice. These approaches include ethics, technology assessment, governance, sustainability, socio-technical integration, and others. JRI intends responsible innovation to be inclusive of such terms as responsible development and sustainable development, and the journal invites comparisons and contrasts among such concepts. While issues of risk and environmental health and safety are relevant, JRI especially encourages attention to the assessment of the broader and more subtle human and social dimensions of innovation—including moral, cultural, political, and religious dimensions, social risk, and sustainability addressed in a systemic fashion.