Chinese international students’ wellbeing: Experiences of assessment in higher education

Q2 Social Sciences
Qiao-ling Dai
{"title":"Chinese international students’ wellbeing: Experiences of assessment in higher education","authors":"Qiao-ling Dai","doi":"10.1177/14788047231194173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While there is growing research identifying the academic and nonacademic challenges to the wellbeing of Chinese international students, there is little discussion about the differences in and challenges of the assessment they experience. This gap appears to come from a tacit assumption that assessment is universal worldwide, or that students will automatically learn strategies to deal with all the contrasts in assessment themselves. Based on personal experience, literature review and the interview responses of a group of Chinese international students’ in the UK answers are sought to three research questions regarding their experiences. Academic hospitality is the theoretical underpinning of the research as this emphasises the bilateral collaboration between international students and higher education providers to support students’ successful transition. The findings show that most participants were surprised and confused about the variety of assessment formats, the expected answers for assessment, and the autonomous learning they experienced in the UK, which were diverse from previous experience in China. While most Chinese students used similar strategies when they first encountered assessment in British universities, they developed new strategies when they realised the diverse expectations. These Chinese internationals needed ongoing support for assessment from the whole university.","PeriodicalId":52531,"journal":{"name":"Citizenship, Social and Economics Education","volume":"110 1","pages":"118 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizenship, Social and Economics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14788047231194173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While there is growing research identifying the academic and nonacademic challenges to the wellbeing of Chinese international students, there is little discussion about the differences in and challenges of the assessment they experience. This gap appears to come from a tacit assumption that assessment is universal worldwide, or that students will automatically learn strategies to deal with all the contrasts in assessment themselves. Based on personal experience, literature review and the interview responses of a group of Chinese international students’ in the UK answers are sought to three research questions regarding their experiences. Academic hospitality is the theoretical underpinning of the research as this emphasises the bilateral collaboration between international students and higher education providers to support students’ successful transition. The findings show that most participants were surprised and confused about the variety of assessment formats, the expected answers for assessment, and the autonomous learning they experienced in the UK, which were diverse from previous experience in China. While most Chinese students used similar strategies when they first encountered assessment in British universities, they developed new strategies when they realised the diverse expectations. These Chinese internationals needed ongoing support for assessment from the whole university.
中国留学生幸福感:高等教育评估的经验
虽然越来越多的研究发现了中国留学生在学业和非学业方面面临的挑战,但很少有人讨论他们在评估中遇到的差异和挑战。这种差距似乎来自一种默认的假设,即评估在世界范围内是普遍的,或者学生将自动学习处理评估中所有差异的策略。基于个人经历、文献综述和一组中国留学生在英国的访谈回答,寻求关于他们经历的三个研究问题的答案。学术好客是该研究的理论基础,因为它强调国际学生和高等教育机构之间的双边合作,以支持学生的成功过渡。调查结果显示,大多数参与者对英国各种各样的评估形式、预期的评估答案以及他们在英国经历的自主学习感到惊讶和困惑,这与之前在中国的经历不同。虽然大多数中国学生在第一次遇到英国大学的评估时使用了类似的策略,但当他们意识到不同的期望时,他们制定了新的策略。这些中国留学生需要整个大学的持续支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Citizenship, Social and Economics Education
Citizenship, Social and Economics Education Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Citizenship, Social and Economics Education (CSEE) is the official journal of the International Association for Citizenship, Social and Economics Education. CSEE is an online-only, peer-reviewed journal that provides a focus for scholarly and professional studies in the fields of education, socialisation, curriculum development and aspects of economics, sociology, politics and social psychology. The journal aims to bring together this range of disciplines into an enabling forum of discussion and exchange. It includes analyses of how children learn about societies, current and past, reports and accounts of current research from a variety of disciplines, as well as reporting and analysing contemporary professional practices and innovations, in curriculum and in the organisation of educational change in these areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书