Sarcoidosis extent relates to molecular variability

C. S. Monast, K. Li, M. Judson, R. Baughman, E. Wadman, R. Watt, P. Silkoff, E. Barnathan, C. Brodmerkel
{"title":"Sarcoidosis extent relates to molecular variability","authors":"C. S. Monast, K. Li, M. Judson, R. Baughman, E. Wadman, R. Watt, P. Silkoff, E. Barnathan, C. Brodmerkel","doi":"10.1111/cei.12942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The molecular basis of sarcoidosis phenotype heterogeneity and its relationship to effective treatment of sarcoidosis have not been elucidated. Peripheral samples from sarcoidosis subjects who participated in a Phase II study of golimumab [anti‐tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐α] and ustekinumab [anti‐interleukin (IL)−12p40] were used to measure the whole blood transcriptome and levels of serum proteins. Differential gene and protein expression analyses were used to explore the molecular differences between sarcoidosis phenotypes as defined by extent of organ involvement. The same data were also used in conjunction with an enrichment algorithm to identify gene expression changes associated with treatment with study drugs compared to placebo. Our analyses revealed marked heterogeneity among the three sarcoidosis phenotypes included in the study cohort, including striking differences in enrichment of the interferon pathway. Conversely, enrichments of multiple pathways, including T cell receptor signalling, were similar among phenotypes. We also identify differences between treatment with golimumab and ustekinumab that may explain the differences in trends for clinical efficacy observed in the trial. We find that molecular heterogeneity is associated with sarcoidosis in a manner that may be related to the extent of organ involvement. These findings may help to explain the difficulty in identifying clinically efficacious sarcoidosis treatments and suggest hypotheses for improved therapeutic strategies.","PeriodicalId":10179,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Experimental Immunology","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Experimental Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.12942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The molecular basis of sarcoidosis phenotype heterogeneity and its relationship to effective treatment of sarcoidosis have not been elucidated. Peripheral samples from sarcoidosis subjects who participated in a Phase II study of golimumab [anti‐tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐α] and ustekinumab [anti‐interleukin (IL)−12p40] were used to measure the whole blood transcriptome and levels of serum proteins. Differential gene and protein expression analyses were used to explore the molecular differences between sarcoidosis phenotypes as defined by extent of organ involvement. The same data were also used in conjunction with an enrichment algorithm to identify gene expression changes associated with treatment with study drugs compared to placebo. Our analyses revealed marked heterogeneity among the three sarcoidosis phenotypes included in the study cohort, including striking differences in enrichment of the interferon pathway. Conversely, enrichments of multiple pathways, including T cell receptor signalling, were similar among phenotypes. We also identify differences between treatment with golimumab and ustekinumab that may explain the differences in trends for clinical efficacy observed in the trial. We find that molecular heterogeneity is associated with sarcoidosis in a manner that may be related to the extent of organ involvement. These findings may help to explain the difficulty in identifying clinically efficacious sarcoidosis treatments and suggest hypotheses for improved therapeutic strategies.
结节病的程度与分子变异性有关
结节病表型异质性的分子基础及其与结节病有效治疗的关系尚未阐明。参与golimumab[抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF) α]和ustekinumab[抗白细胞介素(IL) - 12p40] II期研究的结节病患者外周血样本用于测量全血转录组和血清蛋白水平。差异基因和蛋白表达分析用于探讨结节病表型之间的分子差异,以器官受累程度来定义。同样的数据还与富集算法结合使用,以确定与安慰剂相比,研究药物治疗相关的基因表达变化。我们的分析揭示了研究队列中三种结节病表型的显著异质性,包括干扰素途径富集的显著差异。相反,多种途径的富集,包括T细胞受体信号,在表型中是相似的。我们还确定了戈利姆单抗和乌斯特金单抗治疗之间的差异,这可能解释了试验中观察到的临床疗效趋势的差异。我们发现分子异质性与结节病相关的方式可能与器官受累程度有关。这些发现可能有助于解释难以确定临床有效的结节病治疗方法,并提出改进治疗策略的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信