Elimination of Contrast Agent Gadobutrol with Sustained Low Efficiency Daily Dialysis Compared to Intermittent Hemodialysis

H. Bunz, O. Tschritter, M. Haap, R. Riessen, N. Heyne, F. Artunc
{"title":"Elimination of Contrast Agent Gadobutrol with Sustained Low Efficiency Daily Dialysis Compared to Intermittent Hemodialysis","authors":"H. Bunz, O. Tschritter, M. Haap, R. Riessen, N. Heyne, F. Artunc","doi":"10.1159/000502960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In patients with renal failure, gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) can be removed by intermittent hemodialysis (iHD) to prevent possible toxic effects. There is no data on the efficacy of GBCA removal via sustained low efficiency daily dialysis (SLEDD) which is mainly used in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods: We compared the elimination of the GBCA gadobutrol in 6 ICU patients treated with SLEDD (6–12 h, 90 L dialysate) with 7 normal ward inpatients treated with iHD (4 h, dialysate flow 500 mL/min). Both groups received 3 dialysis sessions on 3 consecutive days starting after the application of gadobutrol. Blood samples were drawn before and after each session and total dialysate, as well as urine was collected. Gadolinium (Gd) concentrations were measured using mass spectrometry and eliminated Gd was calculated from dialysate and urine. Results: The initial mean plasma Gd concentration was 385 ± 183 µM for the iHD and 270 ± 97 µM for the SLEDD group, respectively (p > 0.05). The Gd-reduction rate after the first dialysis session was 83 ± 9 and 67 ± 9% for the iHD and the SLEDD groups, respectively (p = 0.0083). The Gd-reduction rate after the second and third dialysis was 94–98 and 89–96% for the iHD and the SLEDD groups (p > 0.05). The total eliminated Gd was 89 ± 14 and 91 ± 4% of the dose in the iHD and the SLEDD groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Gd dialyzer clearance was 95 ± 22 mL/min and 79 ± 19 mL/min for iHD and SLEDD, respectively (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Gd-elimination with SLEDD is equally effective as iHD and can be safely used to remove GBCA in ICU patients.","PeriodicalId":17810,"journal":{"name":"Kidney and Blood Pressure Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney and Blood Pressure Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000502960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: In patients with renal failure, gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) can be removed by intermittent hemodialysis (iHD) to prevent possible toxic effects. There is no data on the efficacy of GBCA removal via sustained low efficiency daily dialysis (SLEDD) which is mainly used in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods: We compared the elimination of the GBCA gadobutrol in 6 ICU patients treated with SLEDD (6–12 h, 90 L dialysate) with 7 normal ward inpatients treated with iHD (4 h, dialysate flow 500 mL/min). Both groups received 3 dialysis sessions on 3 consecutive days starting after the application of gadobutrol. Blood samples were drawn before and after each session and total dialysate, as well as urine was collected. Gadolinium (Gd) concentrations were measured using mass spectrometry and eliminated Gd was calculated from dialysate and urine. Results: The initial mean plasma Gd concentration was 385 ± 183 µM for the iHD and 270 ± 97 µM for the SLEDD group, respectively (p > 0.05). The Gd-reduction rate after the first dialysis session was 83 ± 9 and 67 ± 9% for the iHD and the SLEDD groups, respectively (p = 0.0083). The Gd-reduction rate after the second and third dialysis was 94–98 and 89–96% for the iHD and the SLEDD groups (p > 0.05). The total eliminated Gd was 89 ± 14 and 91 ± 4% of the dose in the iHD and the SLEDD groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Gd dialyzer clearance was 95 ± 22 mL/min and 79 ± 19 mL/min for iHD and SLEDD, respectively (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Gd-elimination with SLEDD is equally effective as iHD and can be safely used to remove GBCA in ICU patients.
与间歇血液透析相比,持续低效率每日透析消除造影剂加多布超
背景:在肾功能衰竭患者中,钆基对比剂(GBCA)可以通过间歇性血液透析(iHD)去除,以防止可能的毒性作用。目前还没有关于通过持续低效率每日透析(SLEDD)去除GBCA的疗效的数据,这种方法主要用于重症监护病房(ICU)患者。方法:比较6例重症监护室SLEDD患者(6 ~ 12 h,透析液90 L)与7例正常病房iHD患者(4 h,透析液流量500 mL/min)对GBCA的消除情况。两组患者均在加多比超应用后连续3天透析3次。每次治疗前后分别抽取血液、总透析液和尿液。用质谱法测定钆(Gd)浓度,并从透析液和尿液中计算消除钆。结果:iHD组和SLEDD组的初始平均血浆Gd浓度分别为385±183µM和270±97µM (p > 0.05)。iHD组和SLEDD组第一次透析后gd降低率分别为83±9%和67±9% (p = 0.0083)。iHD组和SLEDD组第二次和第三次透析后gd降低率分别为94 - 98%和89-96% (p > 0.05)。iHD组和SLEDD组总消除Gd分别为剂量的89±14%和91±4% (p > 0.05)。iHD和SLEDD的Gd透析清除率分别为95±22 mL/min和79±19 mL/min (p > 0.05)。结论:SLEDD的gd消除与iHD同样有效,可以安全地用于清除ICU患者的GBCA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信