Information Warfare and Digitalization of Politics in a Globalized World

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Prakash Upadhyay
{"title":"Information Warfare and Digitalization of Politics in a Globalized World","authors":"Prakash Upadhyay","doi":"10.3126/jps.v23i1.52280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online media of digital methodology has transformed human behaviors from sociocultural and political backing, interest, and participation to sharing supposition or resistance and has transfigured the approach of interaction and thinking—a serious issue for digital anthropology that centeres on internet-related changes of social marvels, a configuration of chaotic pluralism. With the prime argument that digital social media platforms implant feebleness, insecurity, and instability into social and political life, this paper investigates the risks that online media impose on democracy. Based on auxiliary secondary data, the methodology incorporates qualitative verifiable, and analytical methods. The paper's findings contend that the politico-techno-driven political economy of digital innovation has chopped social and democratic institutions and has destabilized worldwide social relations and politics, democracy has been fumed, stormed, and hacked. Social media has created a modern world order of amazing befuddling filter bubble impact where cyber-violence is misogynistic--social media is just like a redirection of Chinese whispers. Subsequently, with, private on-screen characters, governments' data dispersal, and so-called security and safeguarding of citizens' democratic rights, allegorically, George Orwell’s nightmare of 'Animal Farm' unfurling. In a bourgeois populist science of the 'digital panopticon' of technological colonialism, state surveillance, and bourgeois information, humankind is becoming more divided and unsecured and in the future citizens' will be deprived of numerous sociopolitical rights. Future people may fade under the pressure of high-tech colonialism which concurs with the normalization approach that 'offline field' powerful people are powerful 'online' too. Upcoming democracy is probable to be a discreetly 'high-hat' elitist endeavor. Current endeavors and legislations are romanticized as a glass half empty with very few tools to control cyberspace. It is pivotal to invigorate and fortify citizens’ digital agency and self-determination in society, politics, well-being, and economy, otherwise, societies/countries are probable to be more totalitarian.","PeriodicalId":41810,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Political Science","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jps.v23i1.52280","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online media of digital methodology has transformed human behaviors from sociocultural and political backing, interest, and participation to sharing supposition or resistance and has transfigured the approach of interaction and thinking—a serious issue for digital anthropology that centeres on internet-related changes of social marvels, a configuration of chaotic pluralism. With the prime argument that digital social media platforms implant feebleness, insecurity, and instability into social and political life, this paper investigates the risks that online media impose on democracy. Based on auxiliary secondary data, the methodology incorporates qualitative verifiable, and analytical methods. The paper's findings contend that the politico-techno-driven political economy of digital innovation has chopped social and democratic institutions and has destabilized worldwide social relations and politics, democracy has been fumed, stormed, and hacked. Social media has created a modern world order of amazing befuddling filter bubble impact where cyber-violence is misogynistic--social media is just like a redirection of Chinese whispers. Subsequently, with, private on-screen characters, governments' data dispersal, and so-called security and safeguarding of citizens' democratic rights, allegorically, George Orwell’s nightmare of 'Animal Farm' unfurling. In a bourgeois populist science of the 'digital panopticon' of technological colonialism, state surveillance, and bourgeois information, humankind is becoming more divided and unsecured and in the future citizens' will be deprived of numerous sociopolitical rights. Future people may fade under the pressure of high-tech colonialism which concurs with the normalization approach that 'offline field' powerful people are powerful 'online' too. Upcoming democracy is probable to be a discreetly 'high-hat' elitist endeavor. Current endeavors and legislations are romanticized as a glass half empty with very few tools to control cyberspace. It is pivotal to invigorate and fortify citizens’ digital agency and self-determination in society, politics, well-being, and economy, otherwise, societies/countries are probable to be more totalitarian.
全球化世界中的信息战与政治数字化
数字方法论的网络媒体将人类行为从社会文化和政治支持、兴趣和参与转变为共享假设或抵制,并改变了互动和思考的方式——这是数字人类学的一个重要问题,它以互联网相关的社会奇迹变化为中心,是一种混乱的多元主义配置。基于数字社交媒体平台将脆弱、不安全和不稳定植入社会和政治生活的主要论点,本文调查了网络媒体对民主的风险。该方法以辅助的二手数据为基础,结合定性、可验证和分析方法。该论文的研究结果认为,数字创新的政治技术驱动的政治经济已经破坏了社会和民主制度,破坏了全球社会关系和政治的稳定,民主已经被激怒、冲击和黑客攻击。社交媒体创造了一种现代世界秩序,这种秩序具有惊人的令人困惑的过滤泡沫影响,其中网络暴力是厌恶女性的——社交媒体就像是中国耳语的重新定向。随后,随着银幕上的私人角色、政府的数据分散、以及所谓的安全和公民民主权利的保障,乔治·奥威尔(George Orwell)的《动物农场》(Animal Farm)噩梦寓言般地展开。在一个由技术殖民主义、国家监控和资产阶级信息构成的“数字全景监狱”的资产阶级民粹主义科学中,人类正变得更加分裂和不安全,未来公民将被剥夺许多社会政治权利。未来的人可能会在高科技殖民主义的压力下褪色,这与“线下领域”有权势的人在“线上”也有权势的常态化方法是一致的。即将到来的民主很可能是一种谨慎的“高帽子”精英主义的努力。目前的努力和立法被浪漫化为一个半空的杯子,几乎没有什么工具来控制网络空间。激发和加强公民在社会、政治、福祉和经济方面的数字能动性和自决权至关重要,否则,社会/国家可能会更加极权主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信