An Algorithmic Approach to Uniform Lower Bounds

R. Santhanam
{"title":"An Algorithmic Approach to Uniform Lower Bounds","authors":"R. Santhanam","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a new family of circuit-based sampling tasks, such that non-trivial algorithmic solutions to certain tasks from this family imply frontier uniform lower bounds such as “ NP is not in uniform ACC 0 ” and “ NP does not have uniform polynomial-size depth-two threshold circuits”. Indeed, the most general versions of our sampling tasks have implications for central open problems such as NP vs P and PSPACE vs P . We argue the soundness of our approach by showing that the non-trivial algorithmic solutions we require do follow from standard cryptographic assumptions. In addition, we give evidence that a version of our approach for uniform circuits is necessary in order to separate NP from P or PSPACE from P . We give an algorithmic characterization for the PSPACE vs P question: PSPACE ̸ = P iff either E has sub-exponential time non-uniform algorithms infinitely often or there are non-trivial space-efficient solutions to our sampling tasks for uniform Boolean circuits. We show how to use our framework to capture uniform versions of known non-uniform lower bounds, as well as classical uniform lower bounds such as the space hierarchy theorem and Allender’s uniform lower bound for the Permanent. We also apply our framework to prove new lower bounds: NP does not have polynomial-size uniform AC 0 circuits with a bottom layer of MOD 6 gates, nor does it have polynomial-size uniform AC 0 circuits with a bottom layer of threshold gates. Our proofs exploit recently defined probabilistic time-bounded variants of Kolmogorov complexity [36, 24, 34].","PeriodicalId":11639,"journal":{"name":"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.","volume":"354 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We propose a new family of circuit-based sampling tasks, such that non-trivial algorithmic solutions to certain tasks from this family imply frontier uniform lower bounds such as “ NP is not in uniform ACC 0 ” and “ NP does not have uniform polynomial-size depth-two threshold circuits”. Indeed, the most general versions of our sampling tasks have implications for central open problems such as NP vs P and PSPACE vs P . We argue the soundness of our approach by showing that the non-trivial algorithmic solutions we require do follow from standard cryptographic assumptions. In addition, we give evidence that a version of our approach for uniform circuits is necessary in order to separate NP from P or PSPACE from P . We give an algorithmic characterization for the PSPACE vs P question: PSPACE ̸ = P iff either E has sub-exponential time non-uniform algorithms infinitely often or there are non-trivial space-efficient solutions to our sampling tasks for uniform Boolean circuits. We show how to use our framework to capture uniform versions of known non-uniform lower bounds, as well as classical uniform lower bounds such as the space hierarchy theorem and Allender’s uniform lower bound for the Permanent. We also apply our framework to prove new lower bounds: NP does not have polynomial-size uniform AC 0 circuits with a bottom layer of MOD 6 gates, nor does it have polynomial-size uniform AC 0 circuits with a bottom layer of threshold gates. Our proofs exploit recently defined probabilistic time-bounded variants of Kolmogorov complexity [36, 24, 34].
统一下界的一种算法
我们提出了一种新的基于电路的采样任务族,使得该族中某些任务的非平凡算法解意味着边界均匀下界,例如“NP不处于均匀的ACC 0”和“NP不具有均匀的多项式大小的深度-二阈值电路”。事实上,我们的抽样任务的最一般版本对中心开放问题(如NP vs P和PSPACE vs P)有影响。我们通过证明我们需要的非平凡算法解决方案确实遵循标准密码学假设来论证我们方法的合理性。此外,我们给出的证据表明,为了将NP从P或PSPACE从P分离出来,我们的方法的一个版本是必要的。我们给出了PSPACE vs P问题的一个算法表征:如果E具有次指数时间非均匀算法,或者对于均匀布尔电路的采样任务存在非平凡的空间高效解,则PSPACE = P。我们展示了如何使用我们的框架来捕获已知非均匀下界的均匀版本,以及经典的均匀下界,如空间层次定理和Allender的永久均匀下界。我们还应用我们的框架来证明新的下界:NP不具有底层为MOD 6门的多项式大小的均匀AC 0电路,也不具有底层为阈值门的多项式大小的均匀AC 0电路。我们的证明利用了最近定义的Kolmogorov复杂度的概率有界变体[36,24,34]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信