A Novel Curated Scholarly Graph Connecting Textual and Data Publications

IF 1.5 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Ornella Irrera, A. Mannocci, P. Manghi, G. Silvello
{"title":"A Novel Curated Scholarly Graph Connecting Textual and Data Publications","authors":"Ornella Irrera, A. Mannocci, P. Manghi, G. Silvello","doi":"10.1145/3597310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last decade, scholarly graphs became fundamental to storing and managing scholarly knowledge in a structured and machine-readable way. Methods and tools for discovery and impact assessment of science rely on such graphs and their quality to serve scientists, policymakers, and publishers. Since research data became very important in scholarly communication, scholarly graphs started including dataset metadata and their relationships to publications. Such graphs are the foundations for Open Science investigations, data-article publishing workflows, discovery, and assessment indicators. However, due to the heterogeneity of practices (FAIRness is indeed in the making), they often lack the complete and reliable metadata necessary to perform accurate data analysis; e.g., dataset metadata is inaccurate, author names are not uniform, and the semantics of the relationships is unknown, ambiguous or incomplete. This work describes an open and curated scholarly graph we built and published as a training and test set for data discovery, data connection, author disambiguation, and link prediction tasks. Overall the graph contains 4,047 publications, 5,488 datasets, 22 software, 21,561 authors; 9,692 edges interconnect publications to datasets and software and are labeled with semantics that outline whether a publication is citing, referencing, documenting, supplementing another product. To ensure high-quality metadata and semantics, we relied on the information extracted from PDFs of the publications and the datasets and software webpages to curate and enrich nodes metadata and edges semantics. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first ever published resource, including publications and datasets with manually validated and curated metadata.","PeriodicalId":44355,"journal":{"name":"ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality","volume":"42 1","pages":"1 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3597310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the last decade, scholarly graphs became fundamental to storing and managing scholarly knowledge in a structured and machine-readable way. Methods and tools for discovery and impact assessment of science rely on such graphs and their quality to serve scientists, policymakers, and publishers. Since research data became very important in scholarly communication, scholarly graphs started including dataset metadata and their relationships to publications. Such graphs are the foundations for Open Science investigations, data-article publishing workflows, discovery, and assessment indicators. However, due to the heterogeneity of practices (FAIRness is indeed in the making), they often lack the complete and reliable metadata necessary to perform accurate data analysis; e.g., dataset metadata is inaccurate, author names are not uniform, and the semantics of the relationships is unknown, ambiguous or incomplete. This work describes an open and curated scholarly graph we built and published as a training and test set for data discovery, data connection, author disambiguation, and link prediction tasks. Overall the graph contains 4,047 publications, 5,488 datasets, 22 software, 21,561 authors; 9,692 edges interconnect publications to datasets and software and are labeled with semantics that outline whether a publication is citing, referencing, documenting, supplementing another product. To ensure high-quality metadata and semantics, we relied on the information extracted from PDFs of the publications and the datasets and software webpages to curate and enrich nodes metadata and edges semantics. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first ever published resource, including publications and datasets with manually validated and curated metadata.
连接文本和数据出版物的一种新颖的策划学术图
在过去的十年中,学术图表成为以结构化和机器可读的方式存储和管理学术知识的基础。科学发现和影响评估的方法和工具依赖于这些图表及其质量来为科学家、政策制定者和出版商服务。由于研究数据在学术交流中变得非常重要,学术图表开始包括数据集元数据及其与出版物的关系。这些图表是开放科学调查、数据-文章出版工作流程、发现和评估指标的基础。然而,由于实践的异质性(公平性确实正在形成中),它们往往缺乏执行准确数据分析所需的完整可靠的元数据;例如,数据集元数据不准确,作者姓名不统一,关系的语义未知、模糊或不完整。这项工作描述了一个开放和策划的学术图,我们建立并发布了作为数据发现,数据连接,作者消歧和链接预测任务的训练和测试集。总体而言,该图表包含4,047种出版物,5,488个数据集,22个软件,21,561位作者;9692条边将出版物与数据集和软件连接起来,并标记为语义,概述出版物是否引用,参考,记录,补充另一个产品。为了保证高质量的元数据和语义,我们依靠从出版物、数据集和软件网页的pdf中提取的信息来管理和丰富节点元数据和边缘语义。据我们所知,这是有史以来第一个发布的资源,包括人工验证和管理元数据的出版物和数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality
ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信