M. Zope, D. Patil, Angel Kuriakose, Aslam Rahman, V. Trivedi, S. Keshri
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Dosimetric Analysis of Three Different Sets of Five Fields and Seven Fields IMRT Plans for Prostate Cancer","authors":"M. Zope, D. Patil, Angel Kuriakose, Aslam Rahman, V. Trivedi, S. Keshri","doi":"10.4236/ijmpcero.2019.83016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advent of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) is rapidly \nchanging the field of Radiation Oncology. IMRT has the potential to improve \nclinical implementation of highly conformal non-convex dose distributions. \nNonetheless, a number of IMRT approaches including coplanar and noncoplanar \nbeam techniques with 5 to 9 beams at different angles have been used in \nan effort to get the best dose distribution. The purpose of this study is to \ncompare the dose to normal tissue and dose-limiting structures, conformity \nindex, homogeneity index, number of monitor units required for the treatment \nof prostate cancer in 3 sets of five and seven beam IMRT plans and thus \nto select the best IMRT approach for patients with prostate cancer.","PeriodicalId":14028,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ijmpcero.2019.83016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The advent of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) is rapidly
changing the field of Radiation Oncology. IMRT has the potential to improve
clinical implementation of highly conformal non-convex dose distributions.
Nonetheless, a number of IMRT approaches including coplanar and noncoplanar
beam techniques with 5 to 9 beams at different angles have been used in
an effort to get the best dose distribution. The purpose of this study is to
compare the dose to normal tissue and dose-limiting structures, conformity
index, homogeneity index, number of monitor units required for the treatment
of prostate cancer in 3 sets of five and seven beam IMRT plans and thus
to select the best IMRT approach for patients with prostate cancer.