Precarious Sovereignty in a Post-liberal Europe: The COVID-19 Emergency in Estonia and Finland.

IF 3.4 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Chinese Political Science Review Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-23 DOI:10.1007/s41111-020-00165-y
Andrey Makarychev, Tatiana Romashko
{"title":"Precarious Sovereignty in a Post-liberal Europe: The COVID-19 Emergency in Estonia and Finland.","authors":"Andrey Makarychev, Tatiana Romashko","doi":"10.1007/s41111-020-00165-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The paper addresses a puzzle resulting from the current global state of alert: the coronavirus pandemic brought us back to the world of the allegedly sovereign nation states with borders and national governments in charge, yet in fact, this retrieved sovereignty looks very vulnerable and precarious. We explain this controversy through a triad of concepts-sovereignty, governmentality, and post-liberalism-that we apply to an analysis of a corona-imposed state of emergency in Estonia and Finland. Based on comparative case study research, we posit that sovereignty is precarious in post-liberalism due to its large dependence on the technologies of responsibilization and agency. From a biopolitical perspective, a major point in the anti-crisis management is to convince people to sacrifice personal liberties for the sake of public safety. These issues of governmentality will be dealt with based on critical discourse analysis and media analysis in Estonia and Finland.</p>","PeriodicalId":44455,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Political Science Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"63-85"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00165-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper addresses a puzzle resulting from the current global state of alert: the coronavirus pandemic brought us back to the world of the allegedly sovereign nation states with borders and national governments in charge, yet in fact, this retrieved sovereignty looks very vulnerable and precarious. We explain this controversy through a triad of concepts-sovereignty, governmentality, and post-liberalism-that we apply to an analysis of a corona-imposed state of emergency in Estonia and Finland. Based on comparative case study research, we posit that sovereignty is precarious in post-liberalism due to its large dependence on the technologies of responsibilization and agency. From a biopolitical perspective, a major point in the anti-crisis management is to convince people to sacrifice personal liberties for the sake of public safety. These issues of governmentality will be dealt with based on critical discourse analysis and media analysis in Estonia and Finland.

后自由欧洲的不稳定主权:爱沙尼亚和芬兰的COVID-19紧急情况。
这篇论文解决了当前全球警戒状态带来的一个难题:冠状病毒大流行把我们带回了所谓的主权民族国家的世界,这些国家有边界,有国家政府负责,但实际上,这种恢复的主权看起来非常脆弱和不稳定。我们通过主权、治理和后自由主义这三个概念来解释这一争议,并将其应用于对爱沙尼亚和芬兰冠状病毒造成的紧急状态的分析。基于比较案例研究,我们认为主权在后自由主义中是不稳定的,因为它很大程度上依赖于责任和代理技术。从生命政治的角度来看,危机应对的重点是说服人们为了公共安全而牺牲个人自由。这些治理问题将根据爱沙尼亚和芬兰的批评性话语分析和媒体分析来处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: This journal aims to publish original and cutting-edge research in all areas of political science, such as political theory, comparative politics, international relations, public administration, public policy, methodology, and Chinese politics and government. In the meantime it also provides a major and visible platform for the intellectual dialogue between Chinese and international scholars, and disseminate scholarship that can shed light on the ever changing field of Chinese political studies, stimulate reflective discourse as the field continues to develop both within and outside China. All research articles published in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review. In additional original research articles, Chinese Political Science Review also publishes book reviews to disseminate comprehensive reviews of emerging topics in all areas of political science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信