“Umana cosa è aver compassione”: Boccaccio, Compassion, and the Ethics of Literature

IF 0.1 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
I Tatti Studies Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI:10.1086/702551
Gur Zak
{"title":"“Umana cosa è aver compassione”: Boccaccio, Compassion, and the Ethics of Literature","authors":"Gur Zak","doi":"10.1086/702551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE EMOTION OF COMPASSION has been at the center of scholarly attention of several disciplines in recent years: history, philosophy, cognitive psychology, and literary studies all have taken interest in this emotion and its ethical, political, and poetic implications. For thinkers such as Martha Nussbaum and Stephen Pinker, compassion, defined as “a painful emotion directed at another person’s misfortune or suffering,” is the “basic social emotion,” the glue that holds humans together and serves as the basis of a democratic and just society. For both, moreover, it is literature—and especially literature with a strong tragic component— that serves as the primary means of cultivating this essentially humane trait. The empathetic identification with the hardships of literary characters, they argue, develops our ability to recognize our shared human vulnerabilities and thus become compassionate and caring people in real life. This view regarding the value of compassion—and the power of literary fictions to cultivate it—is not without its critics, however. Some contemporary scholars challenge the social and political merits of compassion, claiming that it leads hu-","PeriodicalId":42173,"journal":{"name":"I Tatti Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I Tatti Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/702551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

THE EMOTION OF COMPASSION has been at the center of scholarly attention of several disciplines in recent years: history, philosophy, cognitive psychology, and literary studies all have taken interest in this emotion and its ethical, political, and poetic implications. For thinkers such as Martha Nussbaum and Stephen Pinker, compassion, defined as “a painful emotion directed at another person’s misfortune or suffering,” is the “basic social emotion,” the glue that holds humans together and serves as the basis of a democratic and just society. For both, moreover, it is literature—and especially literature with a strong tragic component— that serves as the primary means of cultivating this essentially humane trait. The empathetic identification with the hardships of literary characters, they argue, develops our ability to recognize our shared human vulnerabilities and thus become compassionate and caring people in real life. This view regarding the value of compassion—and the power of literary fictions to cultivate it—is not without its critics, however. Some contemporary scholars challenge the social and political merits of compassion, claiming that it leads hu-
“人类有什么是仁慈的?
近年来,同情心一直是几个学科学术关注的中心:历史、哲学、认知心理学和文学研究都对这种情感及其伦理、政治和诗歌含义感兴趣。对于玛莎·努斯鲍姆(Martha Nussbaum)和斯蒂芬·平克(Stephen Pinker)等思想家来说,同情心被定义为“针对另一个人的不幸或痛苦的痛苦情绪”,是“基本的社会情绪”,是将人类团结在一起的粘合剂,是民主和公正社会的基础。此外,对于这两种人来说,文学——尤其是具有强烈悲剧成分的文学——是培养这种本质上的人文特质的主要手段。他们认为,对文学人物苦难的同情认同,培养了我们认识到我们共同的人性弱点的能力,从而在现实生活中成为富有同情心和爱心的人。然而,这种关于同情心价值的观点——以及文学小说培养同情心的力量——并非没有批评者。一些当代学者对同情的社会和政治价值提出了质疑,声称它会导致胡适
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
I Tatti Studies
I Tatti Studies MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信