Rethinking Peace, Peace Research and Peacebuilding

Q4 Social Sciences
L. Goetschel, T. Hagmann
{"title":"Rethinking Peace, Peace Research and Peacebuilding","authors":"L. Goetschel, T. Hagmann","doi":"10.5167/UZH-59598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We develop our argument in five steps. The first section retraces the evolving interaction between peace research and politics. It recalls some of the central features of critical peace research as well as the articulation between norms and causal assumptions. The second and third sections expound what we call the bureaucratisation of positive peace by governments and NGOs at both the institutional and ideational levels. We draw attention to how peacebuilding has been institutionalized in diplomatic and aid organizations and how it propagates a set of received wisdoms about peace. In the fourth section we problematize a number of paradoxes of state sponsored peacebuilding from the viewpoint of critical peace research. Finally, we offer a number of concluding observations on the role of peace researchers and some suggestions how a tradition of critical peace research could be reinvigorated to fruitfully engage with contemporary peace issues.","PeriodicalId":52448,"journal":{"name":"Internationale Politik","volume":"8 1 1","pages":"45-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internationale Politik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-59598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We develop our argument in five steps. The first section retraces the evolving interaction between peace research and politics. It recalls some of the central features of critical peace research as well as the articulation between norms and causal assumptions. The second and third sections expound what we call the bureaucratisation of positive peace by governments and NGOs at both the institutional and ideational levels. We draw attention to how peacebuilding has been institutionalized in diplomatic and aid organizations and how it propagates a set of received wisdoms about peace. In the fourth section we problematize a number of paradoxes of state sponsored peacebuilding from the viewpoint of critical peace research. Finally, we offer a number of concluding observations on the role of peace researchers and some suggestions how a tradition of critical peace research could be reinvigorated to fruitfully engage with contemporary peace issues.
反思和平、和平研究与建设和平
我们分五个步骤展开我们的论点。第一部分回顾了和平研究与政治之间不断发展的相互作用。它回顾了批判性和平研究的一些核心特征,以及规范与因果假设之间的联系。第二和第三部分分别从制度和理念两个层面阐述了我们所说的政府和非政府组织对积极和平的官僚化。我们提请注意建设和平如何在外交和援助组织中制度化,以及它如何传播一套关于和平的公认智慧。在第四部分中,我们从批判性和平研究的角度提出了一些国家资助的建设和平的悖论。最后,我们就和平研究人员的作用提出了一些结论性意见,并就如何重振批判性和平研究的传统以富有成效地参与当代和平问题提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internationale Politik
Internationale Politik Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信